Choose Search Type
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Buell Wesley Frazier, Linnie Mae and Bill Randle
Today at 11:15 am by Mick Purdy

» BWF Where's Your Rider Reprise
Yesterday at 12:35 pm by Mick Purdy

» More Greg Bashing From Hargrove
Yesterday at 1:41 am by Jake Sykes

» Was Craig Rogered?
Sun 22 Apr 2018, 7:26 pm by barto

» allan grant photos
Sun 22 Apr 2018, 5:24 pm by barto

» Skunk Smells - Math Sucks
Sun 22 Apr 2018, 9:28 am by Jake Sykes

» Dealey Plaza UK Canterbury Seminar 2018
Sat 21 Apr 2018, 12:44 am by barto

» Pieces of the Puzzle: An Anthology
Sat 21 Apr 2018, 12:21 am by Vinny

» Reid Technique And False Confessions
Sat 21 Apr 2018, 12:00 am by Vinny

Log in

I forgot my password

Social bookmarking

Social bookmarking digg  Social bookmarking delicious  Social bookmarking reddit  Social bookmarking stumbleupon  Social bookmarking slashdot  Social bookmarking yahoo  Social bookmarking google  Social bookmarking blogmarks  Social bookmarking live      

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

RSS feeds


Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 


Affiliates
free forum
 



scenario

Go down

scenario

Post by greg parker on Thu 16 Nov 2017, 9:04 am

Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

As a starting point, do you

a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

b) Blame Israel?

c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

d) Interview James Files?

e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

________________________

Ye shall know them by their answer...

_________________
Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
-----------------------------
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me

“God favors drunks, small children, and the cataclysmically stoned...” Steve King
"The worst thing about some men is that when they are not drunk they are sober." Billy Yeats
"You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on." Dino Martin



https://www.thenewdisease.space
avatar
greg parker
Admin

Posts : 4797
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 60
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

Re: scenario

Post by The Prodigal Son on Fri 17 Nov 2017, 6:53 am

greg parker wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

As a starting point, do you

a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

b) Blame Israel?

c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

d) Interview James Files?

e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

________________________

Ye shall know them by their answer...

You missed out i) Bring in David Lifton, David Josephs and Peter Lemkin to explain what really happened to the media outlets

But, yeah, I'd be going with h)
avatar
The Prodigal Son

Posts : 150
Join date : 2014-11-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: scenario

Post by greg parker on Fri 17 Nov 2017, 7:43 am

The Prodigal Son wrote:
greg parker wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

As a starting point, do you

a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

b) Blame Israel?

c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

d) Interview James Files?

e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

________________________

Ye shall know them by their answer...

You missed out i) Bring in David Lifton, David Josephs and Peter Lemkin to explain what really happened to the media outlets

But, yeah, I'd be going with h)
Always miss something! Thanks Lee.

_________________
Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
-----------------------------
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me

“God favors drunks, small children, and the cataclysmically stoned...” Steve King
"The worst thing about some men is that when they are not drunk they are sober." Billy Yeats
"You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on." Dino Martin



https://www.thenewdisease.space
avatar
greg parker
Admin

Posts : 4797
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 60
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

Re: scenario

Post by BC_II on Fri 17 Nov 2017, 3:48 pm

I would say A), C) & H), period, but thats me and I'm open to being educated. I think A) could possibly reveal some very damaging information relating to the case (Simpich theory) that could also (and possibly again) uncover leads as to who was involved with the LHO episode in Mexico City.

BC_II

Posts : 69
Join date : 2017-06-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: scenario

Post by Mick Purdy on Wed 22 Nov 2017, 7:59 pm

greg parker wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

As a starting point, do you

a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

b) Blame Israel?

c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

d) Interview James Files?

e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

________________________

Ye shall know them by their answer...
Bugger me Greg, now you gone and done it! So many choices. What say all logical rational people. What say All of the above except (H). Yep! 54 years on and counting. Buffoons. Spot on Greg as always.
avatar
Mick Purdy

Posts : 406
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: scenario

Post by Ed. Ledoux on Thu 23 Nov 2017, 7:07 pm

I'd go with H and L, but L doesn't exist  Laughing
avatar
Ed. Ledoux

Posts : 1176
Join date : 2012-01-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: scenario

Post by greg parker on Thu 23 Nov 2017, 11:23 pm

Ed. Ledoux wrote:I'd go with H and L, but L doesn't exist  Laughing
No Lee, only Hardly!

_________________
Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
-----------------------------
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me

“God favors drunks, small children, and the cataclysmically stoned...” Steve King
"The worst thing about some men is that when they are not drunk they are sober." Billy Yeats
"You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on." Dino Martin



https://www.thenewdisease.space
avatar
greg parker
Admin

Posts : 4797
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 60
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

Re: scenario

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum