Search
Display results as :
Advanced Search
Similar topics
    Latest topics
    Log in
    Social bookmarking
    Social bookmarking digg  Social bookmarking delicious  Social bookmarking reddit  Social bookmarking stumbleupon  Social bookmarking slashdot  Social bookmarking yahoo  Social bookmarking google  Social bookmarking blogmarks  Social bookmarking live      

    Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

    Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website
    RSS feeds

    Yahoo! 
    MSN 
    AOL 
    Netvibes 
    Bloglines 
    Like/Tweet/+1
    Affiliates
    free forum
     



    Share
    Go down
    greg parker
    Admin
    Posts : 5251
    Join date : 2009-08-21
    Age : 60
    Location : Orange, NSW, Australia
    View user profilehttp:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

    scenario

    on Thu 16 Nov 2017, 9:04 am
    Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

    You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

    As a starting point, do you

    a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

    b) Blame Israel?

    c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

    d) Interview James Files?

    e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

    f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

    g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

    h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

    ________________________

    Ye shall know them by their answer...

    _________________
    Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
    I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
    While looking down the corridor
    Out to where the van is waiting
    I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

                Billy Bragg
    -----------------------------
     Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
                 Lachie Hulme            
    -----------------------------
    The Cold War ran on bullshit.
                  Me

    “God favors drunks, small children, and the cataclysmically stoned...” Steve King
    "The worst thing about some men is that when they are not drunk they are sober." Billy Yeats
    "You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on." Dino Martin



    https://www.thenewdisease.space
    The Prodigal Son
    Posts : 153
    Join date : 2014-11-09
    View user profile

    Re: scenario

    on Fri 17 Nov 2017, 6:53 am
    greg parker wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

    You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

    As a starting point, do you

    a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

    b) Blame Israel?

    c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

    d) Interview James Files?

    e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

    f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

    g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

    h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

    ________________________

    Ye shall know them by their answer...

    You missed out i) Bring in David Lifton, David Josephs and Peter Lemkin to explain what really happened to the media outlets

    But, yeah, I'd be going with h)
    greg parker
    Admin
    Posts : 5251
    Join date : 2009-08-21
    Age : 60
    Location : Orange, NSW, Australia
    View user profilehttp:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

    Re: scenario

    on Fri 17 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
    The Prodigal Son wrote:
    greg parker wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

    You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

    As a starting point, do you

    a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

    b) Blame Israel?

    c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

    d) Interview James Files?

    e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

    f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

    g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

    h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

    ________________________

    Ye shall know them by their answer...

    You missed out i) Bring in David Lifton, David Josephs and Peter Lemkin to explain what really happened to the media outlets

    But, yeah, I'd be going with h)
    Always miss something! Thanks Lee.

    _________________
    Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
    I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
    While looking down the corridor
    Out to where the van is waiting
    I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

                Billy Bragg
    -----------------------------
     Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
                 Lachie Hulme            
    -----------------------------
    The Cold War ran on bullshit.
                  Me

    “God favors drunks, small children, and the cataclysmically stoned...” Steve King
    "The worst thing about some men is that when they are not drunk they are sober." Billy Yeats
    "You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on." Dino Martin



    https://www.thenewdisease.space
    avatar
    Posts : 111
    Join date : 2017-06-02
    View user profile

    Re: scenario

    on Fri 17 Nov 2017, 3:48 pm
    I would say A), C) & H), period, but thats me and I'm open to being educated. I think A) could possibly reveal some very damaging information relating to the case (Simpich theory) that could also (and possibly again) uncover leads as to who was involved with the LHO episode in Mexico City.
    Mick Purdy
    Posts : 893
    Join date : 2013-07-26
    Location : Melbourne Australia
    View user profile

    Re: scenario

    on Wed 22 Nov 2017, 7:59 pm
    greg parker wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

    You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

    As a starting point, do you

    a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

    b) Blame Israel?

    c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

    d) Interview James Files?

    e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

    f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

    g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

    h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

    ________________________

    Ye shall know them by their answer...
    Bugger me Greg, now you gone and done it! So many choices. What say all logical rational people. What say All of the above except (H). Yep! 54 years on and counting. Buffoons. Spot on Greg as always.
    Ed. Ledoux
    Posts : 1540
    Join date : 2012-01-04
    View user profile

    Re: scenario

    on Thu 23 Nov 2017, 7:07 pm
    I'd go with H and L, but L doesn't exist  Laughing
    greg parker
    Admin
    Posts : 5251
    Join date : 2009-08-21
    Age : 60
    Location : Orange, NSW, Australia
    View user profilehttp:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

    Re: scenario

    on Thu 23 Nov 2017, 11:23 pm
    Ed. Ledoux wrote:I'd go with H and L, but L doesn't exist  Laughing
    No Lee, only Hardly!

    _________________
    Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
    I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
    While looking down the corridor
    Out to where the van is waiting
    I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

                Billy Bragg
    -----------------------------
     Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
                 Lachie Hulme            
    -----------------------------
    The Cold War ran on bullshit.
                  Me

    “God favors drunks, small children, and the cataclysmically stoned...” Steve King
    "The worst thing about some men is that when they are not drunk they are sober." Billy Yeats
    "You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on." Dino Martin



    https://www.thenewdisease.space
    Sponsored content

    Re: scenario

    Back to top
    Permissions in this forum:
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum