Search
Display results as :
Advanced Search
Latest topics
Craig's Mauser 7.65 stampSun 16 Dec 2018, 7:54 amMick Purdy
Fair Play For Brian DoyleThu 13 Dec 2018, 4:06 ambarto
More Tabloid TrashMon 10 Dec 2018, 8:06 amMick Purdy
Back Yard PhotographyMon 10 Dec 2018, 1:53 amJake Sykes
Amos Lee EuinsSat 08 Dec 2018, 9:48 ambarto
Judith McCullyWed 05 Dec 2018, 4:17 ambarto
Log in
Social bookmarking
Social bookmarking digg  Social bookmarking delicious  Social bookmarking reddit  Social bookmarking stumbleupon  Social bookmarking slashdot  Social bookmarking yahoo  Social bookmarking google  Social bookmarking blogmarks  Social bookmarking live      

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website
RSS feeds

Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 
Like/Tweet/+1
Affiliates
free forum
 



Share
Go down
Posts : 25
Join date : 2017-11-11
View user profile

You can't measure JFK's head motion in 313 but you can still make a case

on Thu 14 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
There is math but I tried to write it so you can get the gist without really following the math.  The idea is that there might be a way to actually make the case that the shot in 313 could not have caused JFK's motion in that frame.  I don't think it did.  I think it was that early 60's power brake problem where they reacted violently though briefly to touching the pedal the wrong way.  They cursed blurring in that frame might actually be put to good use.  If you know any scientific historians looking for something to write a paper about, please pass this on.  This link did not work in preview.


http://joliraja.com/HeadMeasure/Measure313Not.pdf
Back to top
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum