Choose Search Type
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» ROKC Lampoon
Today at 9:08 am by greg parker

» The Bold and the Italics
Today at 9:06 am by greg parker

» Shirley Temple is Prayer Man According to Duncan McRae
Today at 4:12 am by steely dan

» The Eighth Naval District
Yesterday at 11:33 pm by Hasan Yusuf

» Send Lawyers Guns & Money Pt2
Yesterday at 8:08 pm by barto

» Send Lawyers Guns & Money Pt1
Yesterday at 11:58 am by barto

» JFK Assassination
Yesterday at 7:15 am by jack ferguson

» Lifton on his "new evidence"
Yesterday at 4:47 am by steely dan

» friends student exchange programs
Wed 07 Dec 2016, 12:01 pm by greg parker

Log in

I forgot my password

Social bookmarking

Social bookmarking Digg  Social bookmarking Delicious  Social bookmarking Reddit  Social bookmarking Stumbleupon  Social bookmarking Slashdot  Social bookmarking Furl  Social bookmarking Yahoo  Social bookmarking Google  Social bookmarking Blinklist  Social bookmarking Blogmarks  Social bookmarking Technorati  

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

RSS feeds


Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 


Affiliates
free forum
 



firearm question

View previous topic View next topic Go down

firearm question

Post by greg parker on Sun 08 Apr 2012, 4:01 pm

Am putting this question here since it has to do with an assassination other than those listed:

Would firing a pistol through a coat wrapped around it and the hand holding it be enough to make the sound muffled... dropping the noise to sound perhaps more like a firecracker?

_________________
Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
-----------------------------
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me

greg parker
Admin

Posts : 3450
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 58
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

Re: firearm question

Post by 9K116 on Sun 08 Apr 2012, 6:48 pm

I believe it wouldn't be considerable supression. Main source of firing sound is very fast expansion of gases (products of burning of propulsion charge) and, for supersonic rounds, sound barier. If firearm has a subsonic muzzle velocity, the last is no problem for suppression.

Coat, wrapped around weapon, wouldn't provide considerable diffusion of muzzle gases, so it would be bad solution of suppresion with none or little effect.

9K116

Posts : 75
Join date : 2010-04-08
Location : Riga, Latvija

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: firearm question

Post by greg parker on Sun 08 Apr 2012, 6:58 pm

Thanks. This may have happened in a 1948 assassination in South America. Maybe the coat was more to hide the weapon than for sound suppression?

_________________
Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
-----------------------------
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me

greg parker
Admin

Posts : 3450
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 58
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

Re: firearm question

Post by greg parker on Sun 08 Apr 2012, 7:00 pm

greg parker wrote:Thanks. This may have happened in a 1948 assassination in South America. Maybe the coat was more to hide the weapon than for sound suppression?

On the other hand... four shots were fired... the first three were [described by witnesses as] muffled but hit the target. There was a brief pause before the fourth shot. It was not muffled and missed the target. Possibly two people involved.

_________________
Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
-----------------------------
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me

greg parker
Admin

Posts : 3450
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 58
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

Re: firearm question

Post by 9K116 on Sun 08 Apr 2012, 7:14 pm

I believe the coat is primary to hide the weapon (and without anyone seeing weapon in your hand, you have some chances to escape scene without being pointed at as obvious murder).

9K116

Posts : 75
Join date : 2010-04-08
Location : Riga, Latvija

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: firearm question

Post by Sponsored content Today at 12:55 pm


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum