Choose Search Type
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» ROKC Lampoon
Today at 9:08 am by greg parker

» The Bold and the Italics
Today at 9:06 am by greg parker

» Shirley Temple is Prayer Man According to Duncan McRae
Today at 4:12 am by steely dan

» The Eighth Naval District
Yesterday at 11:33 pm by Hasan Yusuf

» Send Lawyers Guns & Money Pt2
Yesterday at 8:08 pm by barto

» Send Lawyers Guns & Money Pt1
Yesterday at 11:58 am by barto

» JFK Assassination
Yesterday at 7:15 am by jack ferguson

» Lifton on his "new evidence"
Yesterday at 4:47 am by steely dan

» friends student exchange programs
Wed 07 Dec 2016, 12:01 pm by greg parker

Log in

I forgot my password

Social bookmarking

Social bookmarking Digg  Social bookmarking Delicious  Social bookmarking Reddit  Social bookmarking Stumbleupon  Social bookmarking Slashdot  Social bookmarking Furl  Social bookmarking Yahoo  Social bookmarking Google  Social bookmarking Blinklist  Social bookmarking Blogmarks  Social bookmarking Technorati  

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

RSS feeds


Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 


Affiliates
free forum
 



The second assassination of JFK

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The second assassination of JFK

Post by greg parker on Sat 15 Sep 2012, 10:09 pm

I continue to be amazed and gutted by the number of intelligent, thoughtful people who suspend disbelief when it comes to Kennedy and all the sex scandals. All the ones I've looked at in any depth turn out to have little (if any) substance beyond innuendo and circumstantial evidence. I got to wondering why then do, so many fall for it?

Some no doubt, are quite happy to jump on such gossip and pass it as fact because it suits their agenda. But in most cases I would think there is something else going on and I thought up a little experiment to test that idea.

What happens with all those sex stories if you remove JFK from them and replace him with Richard Nixon (or just about anyone else, for that matter)? They suddenly seem unbelievable, and you are forced to actually look at evidence and weigh it properly, instead of looking at the alleged perpetrator and assuming guilt. In other words, JFK is a victim of his own good looks and charm. He LOOKS like a rake and we assume he must be.

The facts are that some of the stories that have come out, trace back to the Republican Party. That should ring alarm bells right there.

_________________
Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
-----------------------------
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me

greg parker
Admin

Posts : 3450
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 58
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

Jack Eigan & Friends

Post by Arlene Raquel Kapel on Sat 20 Oct 2012, 4:55 pm

Back in the 1960's-1970's UJack Eigan, a loval radio talk host here in Chicago (WMAG-670- now WSCR a sports-Talk station) Judith Campbell Exner, and others of this ilk, often as his guest. Eigan was geat friends of Irv Kupcinet, Sun-Times gossip columnist and Sidney Korshack, Chicao=Los Angeles lawyer with very close ties to the Chicago mob.To find out more bout Korshack see Supermob by Russo. Btw Mr Russo is a long nut guy.

Arlene Raquel Kapel

Posts : 40
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 68
Location : I'm retired & live near Chicago

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The second assassination of JFK

Post by greg parker on Sat 20 Oct 2012, 5:25 pm

So Exner and others like her were given lots of air time to spread this stuff?

Sadly, I can't say I'm surprised.

_________________
Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
-----------------------------
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me

greg parker
Admin

Posts : 3450
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 58
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

Re: The second assassination of JFK

Post by Arlene Raquel Kapel on Sat 20 Oct 2012, 5:47 pm

greg parker wrote:So Exner and others like her were given lots of air time to spread this stuff?

Sadly, I can't say I'm surprised.

Yes they were, And Eigan was considered a liberal ! During this time Eigan had as a quest a wll know Private Eye, whose name I can't recall, but he was well know back then. In an interview this PI stated that the Kennedy family was involved in the Marilyn Monroes death, without naming names he "fingered" Peter Lawford and Sammy Davis as Marilyns killers.

Arlene Raquel Kapel

Posts : 40
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 68
Location : I'm retired & live near Chicago

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The second assassination of JFK

Post by Arlene Raquel Kapel on Fri 21 Mar 2014, 6:31 am

The book "Crypt 33" lists "The Ant" Spilatro as one of her killers. The movie "Casino", starring Robert DeNiro, Sharon Stone, and Joe Pesci, as a character based on Chicago hood Spilatro, was made in the 1990's. DeNiro's character is based on the late Frank "Lefty" Rosenthal another Chicago based gambler.

Arlene Raquel Kapel

Posts : 40
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 68
Location : I'm retired & live near Chicago

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The second assassination of JFK

Post by Terry W. Martin on Fri 21 Mar 2014, 11:54 pm

I think this disinfo is a continuation of the Secret Service's mantra that Kennedy - in essence - killed himself. First with the lie about getting the "ivy league charlatans" out of the line of fire and second with the story that so many of the Detail were conflicted because of Kennedy's "womanizing".

Killing him wasn't enough for these guys. They sought to blame his death on him and, to lessen our loss, they have to assassinate his character as well.

The media - of course! - prefers the story of debauchery. No wonder they still adore Clinton so much.

Terry W. Martin

Posts : 690
Join date : 2013-11-30
Age : 65
Location : Middleburg, VA, USA

View user profile http://martianpublishing.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The second assassination of JFK

Post by Sponsored content Today at 12:56 pm


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum