Search
Display results as :
Advanced Search
Latest topics
Fair Play For Brian DoyleYesterday at 4:06 ambarto
More Tabloid TrashMon 10 Dec 2018, 8:06 amMick Purdy
Back Yard PhotographyMon 10 Dec 2018, 1:53 amJake Sykes
Amos Lee EuinsSat 08 Dec 2018, 9:48 ambarto
Judith McCullyWed 05 Dec 2018, 4:17 ambarto
No Shots Fired From The TSBDTue 04 Dec 2018, 3:18 ambarto
Log in
Social bookmarking
Social bookmarking digg  Social bookmarking delicious  Social bookmarking reddit  Social bookmarking stumbleupon  Social bookmarking slashdot  Social bookmarking yahoo  Social bookmarking google  Social bookmarking blogmarks  Social bookmarking live      

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website
RSS feeds

Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 
Like/Tweet/+1
Affiliates
free forum
 



Share
Go down
avatar
Posts : 453
Join date : 2016-08-15
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sat 07 Jul 2018, 9:02 pm
Yes, what Vinny said. Thank you.

Mick, you are the authority on the topic. If you say it will snap back to clear imagery given the originals to look at, then that's the way it is, or should be if anyone possessing them would have the common decency to make them available. (If he was in the window, we'd damn well have them years ago). What a pathetic state of affairs.

_________________
Release clear scans. Reveal the truth about Prayer Man. Preserve the history of the assassination of JFK.
avatar
Posts : 873
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sat 07 Jul 2018, 11:40 pm
The fat lady may very well sing sometime soon. I believe the title of the song is called "It's over"
avatar
Posts : 3267
Join date : 2013-09-03
Age : 65
View user profilehttps://prayermanleeharveyoswald.blogspot.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 08 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
When the first higher-resolution Blu-ray Darnell images were posted in 2013, Sean Murphy's reaction mirrored most everyone's on the board: "This is Lee Oswald. Game over." I remember showing the new Blu-ray images to my wife and she said "Wow." I did the same with my late brother and he said "Damn, Stan, that's him!"
 
Just look at this image of the person standing in the back corner of the entrance—look at it cold—and tell me what you see.

 
 
I see a smallish white man with short, dark hair, that's what. Nobody I've ever showed this picture to has told me otherwise.
 
There's a well-known saying "Seeing is believing." I've come to learn that's not always true. Quite often, it's the other way around. For many, "Believing is seeing."
 
When your eyes tell you that you see X but you say it's Y, what you're really doing is practicing a form of delusion in order to preserve your belief system. It's a form of cognitive dissonance. You alter reality to stay comfortable. People reject anything that makes them uncomfortable. They can't handle the truth.
 
Now—just looking at Darnell—we can't say with 100% certainty that PM is Oswald. We need a clearer image to do that. But we can assign probabilities. I say it's >90%. I can stake my reputation on odds like that.
 
As I started writing Prayer Man, I tried to find fault with the notion that PM was LHO, from an image perspective (excluding all of the evidence that places Oswald on the first floor down in front). I wanted to be right, not let my desires for PM to be Oswald cloud my judgment and reasoning. I noted where Pat Speer thought PM looked like a woman. At the time, he seemed to be credible, so maybe I should expand my thinking. I tried entertain the possibility.
 
Nope, couldn't do it. Prayer Man is a man. Period. My eyes told me that. They still do.
 
Take a look at this image:
 

 
Are these all men? Yes, you say? Good! Because I can tell you that's a fact. I am in this picture. Can you find me? Not so easy? You have a good idea what I look like today from the videos, but finding me in this 1976 low-resolution image when I was in the Engineering Department on a US Navy nuclear cruiser is another thing. Some of my family couldn't even spot me right away.
 
But one thing is certain: there are no fat women with bouffant hairdos holding purses in this image. (Doyle, Trotter, and Stinky might disagree, however.)
avatar
Posts : 453
Join date : 2016-08-15
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 08 Jul 2018, 1:25 pm
"Nope, couldn't do it. Prayer Man is a man. Period. My eyes told me that. They still do."


Same here Stan. And because he's a man, the case is thrown wide open.

_________________
Release clear scans. Reveal the truth about Prayer Man. Preserve the history of the assassination of JFK.
avatar
Posts : 873
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 08 Jul 2018, 2:44 pm
It's fantastic. With all the work that Stan , Bart and others have contributed over the past few years to determine that all other persons on the stairs are accounted for it is all but "cinched" if I can borrow a term.

It's most definitely a man in work clothes-a man who seems to be talking with Frazier. All the TSBD employees had stated that there were no strangers at the building on the day of the assassination.

Could PM be a stranger? Well yes he could be. But what odds that be the case? Did all the TSBD employees lie when asked about a stranger at the building?

In my opinion our biggest clue comes from Frazier. All he could say when shown the Darnell frame and asked whom he thought the figure was standing to his right -  all he had to say was that it looked like Lovelady but it could not have been him because he had headed to the railway yards by that time.

Lets take a moment to think about that. He recognises the figure to be male almost immediately when shown the image, but makes no mention of a stranger, and quite clearly by stating that it resembles Lovelady he has inferred at least in my mind, that it must have been a work colleague standing there. 

I'm with Stan and Jake - right from the get-go I saw a man with a hairline not dissimilar to Oswald. Even the stance of the figure is similar to Oswald's in the various photos and film we have of him.

The fact that it's been a nightmare trying to get hold of the original or first gen copy of the Darnell footage and the resistance from others to the acceptance that the figure could very well be that of Oswald's makes me believe we are correct.

As Jake said had this image been of Oswald in the window it would've been circulating 54 years ago at the highest res possible.
No to my mind, we are close - I believe people know that, people who might matter too.

It's a tiny piece of celluloid of a seemingly unremarkable shot panning up the street to the stairs of the TSBD why on earth would anybody deny access to that?

I think we all know why, at least here at ROKC
Posts : 936
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 08 Jul 2018, 10:30 pm
If it was not Oswald,NBC would have likely released the footage when asked.
Posts : 936
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 08 Jul 2018, 10:46 pm
I enlarged the above image posted by Stan.

avatar
Posts : 3267
Join date : 2013-09-03
Age : 65
View user profilehttps://prayermanleeharveyoswald.blogspot.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Mon 09 Jul 2018, 4:41 am
Mick Purdy wrote:In my opinion our biggest clue comes from Frazier. All he could say when shown the Darnell frame and asked whom he thought the figure was standing to his right -  all he had to say was that it looked like Lovelady but it could not have been him because he had headed to the railway yards by that time.

Lets take a moment to think about that. He recognises the figure to be male almost immediately when shown the image, but makes no mention of a stranger, and quite clearly by stating that it resembles Lovelady he has inferred at least in my mind, that it must have been a work colleague standing there.

Sean Murphy, 9/20/2013 wrote:The reason Buell Wesley Frazier's response is a breakthrough is that Bill Shelley appears to be the only possibility BWF himself can offer when presented with the Prayer Man image. (Although it's not quite clear from Gary's [Mack] message whether BWF himself nominated Shelley or whether that's Gary's own suggestion.)
 
Given that he is not giving us some new revelation as to the presence of some hitherto unmentioned other person on the steps at that time (i.e. a stranger to the building), and given that Prayer Man cannot possibly be Shelley, we have just received startling confirmation that Prayer Man can only reasonably be Lee Oswald.
 
BWF probably knows it's Lee but—for the most understandable reasons in the world—cannot say so. However, to give him credit, he's just done the next best thing.
 
Prayer Man is Lee Harvey Oswald.

When can we provide further corroborating support for this? (I grow impatient.)
avatar
Posts : 1281
Join date : 2015-07-21
View user profilehttp://www.prayer-man.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Mon 09 Jul 2018, 5:47 am
That 3d shadow looks a lot closer as it should be, thanks Jake.
Regarding darkroom....been there done that ten years of it from the mid 80's to the late 90's. 

The issue with the whole thing and the films comes down to one thing, and that is the stuff we are looking at is many generations down, and let me show you something for comparison. this is from video tape, but it is from NBC about a Kennedy docu.
Although dark you can see that all the highlights are covered. The original or even a first gen copy would be crystal clear with a digital scan. It will have more info than Darnell, of which every damn frame is blurred, afaik,

avatar
Posts : 1075
Join date : 2014-08-03
Age : 56
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Wed 11 Jul 2018, 2:18 am
Chin or clavicle says Mr Math. How about explaining how a 140lb male becomes a 300lb woman wearing a wig in a professional situation, Chris? Arse or elbow is more apt.



_________________

You ain't gonna know what you learn if you knew it....... confused


Checkmate.

avatar
Posts : 1281
Join date : 2015-07-21
View user profilehttp://www.prayer-man.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Wed 11 Jul 2018, 2:41 am
avatar
Posts : 1281
Join date : 2015-07-21
View user profilehttp://www.prayer-man.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Wed 11 Jul 2018, 8:48 am


Andrej pointed something out and this time I reckon he is right, although this chews into Molina's face, but I think Roy Edward Lewis is in there.
avatar
Posts : 1530
Join date : 2012-01-04
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Fri 13 Jul 2018, 8:32 pm
If that is REL he fn walked past PM.

Cheers, Ed


Last edited by Ed. Ledoux on Sat 14 Jul 2018, 5:26 am; edited 1 time in total
Posts : 936
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Fri 13 Jul 2018, 9:59 pm
Posts : 936
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Fri 13 Jul 2018, 11:00 pm
Posts : 936
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Fri 13 Jul 2018, 11:12 pm
avatar
Posts : 1075
Join date : 2014-08-03
Age : 56
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 15 Jul 2018, 8:01 am
"My being able to post images is secondary to my arguments of evidence.."
Astonishing bullshit from the Unicorn who can "see" buttons, fingers, a handbag, bingo wings, the Taj Mahal...

_________________

You ain't gonna know what you learn if you knew it....... confused


Checkmate.

avatar
Posts : 1530
Join date : 2012-01-04
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Mon 16 Jul 2018, 6:37 am
Yes his vision is exemplary at times.
Like a retards strength.
I should ask him about the coke bottle on the stairs and his interviewees saying Lee had one.
Doubt he can 'put two and two together.'
That's a different kind of strength.
Posts : 107
Join date : 2017-06-02
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Tue 17 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
Prayer-Man is an argument of evidence though.....off the top of their head, does anyone recall him posting during the amazing discussion going on with Murphy in Kelly's topic back then? I wonder if he sat back and wondered if that was all a waste of time.


Last edited by BC_II on Sat 21 Jul 2018, 6:40 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : forgot a word)
avatar
Posts : 1075
Join date : 2014-08-03
Age : 56
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Tue 17 Jul 2018, 3:54 pm
BC_II wrote:Prayer-Man is an argument of evidence though.....off the top of their head, does anyone recall him posting during the amazing discussion going on with Murphy in Kelly's topic back then? I wonder if sat back and wondered if that was all a waste of time.
BC, much to Brian's discomfort, he is on record at the DPF correcting Trotter who thought PM was female. Not so said Brian. He could see a male figure with short hair and a side part. This of course was prior to any ROKC involvement with the issue.
He would later claim he was "hoodwinked"..........without explaining by who, or why.

_________________

You ain't gonna know what you learn if you knew it....... confused


Checkmate.

avatar
Posts : 3267
Join date : 2013-09-03
Age : 65
View user profilehttps://prayermanleeharveyoswald.blogspot.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Tue 17 Jul 2018, 4:36 pm
steely dan wrote:
BC_II wrote:Prayer-Man is an argument of evidence though.....off the top of their head, does anyone recall him posting during the amazing discussion going on with Murphy in Kelly's topic back then? I wonder if sat back and wondered if that was all a waste of time.
BC, much to Brian's discomfort, he is on record at the DPF correcting Trotter who thought PM was female. Not so said Brian. He could see a male figure with short hair and a side part. This of course was prior to any ROKC involvement with the issue.
He would later claim he was "hoodwinked"..........without explaining by who, or why.

Steely remembers it perfectly. From the Foo Foo:

avatar
Posts : 1281
Join date : 2015-07-21
View user profilehttp://www.prayer-man.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Tue 17 Jul 2018, 11:58 pm
avatar
Posts : 1530
Join date : 2012-01-04
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Wed 18 Jul 2018, 3:18 pm
"Slightly" thicker features... so not Sarah?
Posts : 107
Join date : 2017-06-02
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sat 21 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
steely dan wrote:
BC_II wrote:Prayer-Man is an argument of evidence though.....off the top of their head, does anyone recall him posting during the amazing discussion going on with Murphy in Kelly's topic back then? I wonder if sat back and wondered if that was all a waste of time.
BC, much to Brian's discomfort, he is on record at the DPF correcting Trotter who thought PM was female. Not so said Brian. He could see a male figure with short hair and a side part. This of course was prior to any ROKC involvement with the issue.
He would later claim he was "hoodwinked"..........without explaining by who, or why.

Ahh.....whew. All one can do is sigh at times lol. Thanks Dan for the info bits.
avatar
Posts : 1281
Join date : 2015-07-21
View user profilehttp://www.prayer-man.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Sat 21 Jul 2018, 9:35 pm
From http://22november1963.org.uk/prayer-man-jfk-assassination


Sponsored content

Re: Prayer Man

Back to top
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum