Search
Display results as :
Advanced Search
Latest topics
New LookToday at 8:56 amBC_II
Prayer ManToday at 5:02 amStan Dane
Forrest Sorrels Yesterday at 8:04 pmbarto
William Matson LawYesterday at 12:08 ambarto
Nugan Hand BankSun 05 Aug 2018, 6:10 pmbarto
Log in
Social bookmarking
Social bookmarking digg  Social bookmarking delicious  Social bookmarking reddit  Social bookmarking stumbleupon  Social bookmarking slashdot  Social bookmarking yahoo  Social bookmarking google  Social bookmarking blogmarks  Social bookmarking live      

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website
RSS feeds

Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 
Affiliates
free forum
 



Share
Go down
Posts : 93
Join date : 2017-06-02
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sat 04 Aug 2018, 6:13 am
These poeple who continue to use straw men and say "pixels/blob" are missing the point. They MUST ACCOUNT for who that individual is! I don't care WHAT one believes. So, I ask them, WHO do they think it is and give the arguments. A strong case has been made that, moreso than not, it is LHO.
avatar
Posts : 379
Join date : 2016-08-15
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sat 04 Aug 2018, 9:46 am
Go for it!

_________________
Release clear scans. Reveal the truth about Prayer Man. Preserve the history of the assassination of JFK.
Posts : 746
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sat 04 Aug 2018, 7:20 pm
Posts : 746
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sat 04 Aug 2018, 7:22 pm
Looks like Trit Trot might have been the originator of the Sarah Stanton theory.

Posts : 746
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sat 04 Aug 2018, 7:24 pm
avatar
Posts : 1039
Join date : 2015-07-21
View user profilehttp://www.prayer-man.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Sat 04 Aug 2018, 11:21 pm
Or it was Pat Speer at EF in 2013.
Posts : 746
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 05 Aug 2018, 9:08 pm
Quite likely.
Posts : 746
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 05 Aug 2018, 9:28 pm
Fetzer on Prayer Man. It starts around 1.03.

avatar
Posts : 1039
Join date : 2015-07-21
View user profilehttp://www.prayer-man.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 05 Aug 2018, 10:17 pm
I gave up after 60 seconds.....
avatar
Posts : 1399
Join date : 2012-01-04
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Tue 07 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
The trots command of english, be it "Texish" or British, is equal to his dating proficiency.
His girl broke up with him but she said they can still be cousins.

So be it!

Fetzer is a couple sandwiches short of a Subway franchise... thanks Vinny.

If you name two people near your position, then about to name a third, but are cut off and never name the third person but are asked to rename the second, then the third person was never denoted.
This is not rocket science etymology.

Im using BC's 'quote', thx!!

"The poeple who continue to use straw man arguments, or say its just "pixels, smudge or a blob" are not just missing the point. THEY must account for who that individual is! It matters little WHAT one believes. So WHO do they think it is, and give their arguments. A strong case has been made that, IT IS Lee Harvey Oswald by a study of the evidence.
Thus far their arguments have not been true or correct. Be they shotgunning for strangers or dart boarding females, each in turn has been rejected.
SO BE IT!
Cheers, Ed
Posts : 93
Join date : 2017-06-02
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Tue 07 Aug 2018, 7:53 am
Ed. Ledoux wrote:The trots command of english, be it "Texish" or British, is equal to his dating proficiency.
His girl broke up with him but she said they can still be cousins.

So be it!

Fetzer is a couple sandwiches short of a Subway franchise...  thanks Vinny.

If you name two people near your position, then about to name a third, but are cut off and never name the third person but are asked to rename the second, then the third person was never denoted.
This is not rocket science etymology.

Im using BC's 'quote', thx!!

"The poeple who continue to use straw man arguments, or say its just "pixels, smudge or a blob" are not just missing the point. THEY must account for who that individual is! It matters little WHAT one believes. So WHO do they think it is, and give their arguments. A strong case has been made that, IT IS Lee Harvey Oswald by a study of the evidence.
Thus far their arguments have not been true or correct. Be they shotgunning for strangers or dart boarding females, each in turn has been rejected.
SO BE IT!
Cheers, Ed

Ed it is extremely humbling for you of all people to be using a quote from me lol. I'm just tired of seeing folks attack the nature of a low quality image without recognizing the extreme relevance of the photo in context. I agree with you 100%, I've yet to see ANY convincing argument that it is either A) irrelevant, or B) not LHO. This is HUGE because of the fact that, as I've and so many of you have mentioned before me, whoever it is must be accounted for from even a basic historical perspective. In other words, we don't have know much about 11/22/1963 to know basic facts such as "well who was where in or around the building that worked there that morning?". Interestingly enough it is as if one must start with PM before moving on, else the entire case falls hard if LHO isn't where he is supposed to be officially.
avatar
Posts : 653
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Tue 07 Aug 2018, 8:59 am
It counts for zip, but I know in my heart of hearts it's Lee Oswald a top of the stairs in the shadow in the corner standing right next to the guy who befriended him some 5-6 weeks earlier. The guy whom gave him a lift to work most days. The guy who taught him on the job. The guy who was with him more than most - for the time he worked in at the TSBD. The guy who knows exactly who was standing next to him immediately after the shots rang out. That guy!

It's Lee Oswald. It is proven beyond a reasonable doubt. And Buell Wesley Frazier knows this.
Posts : 746
Join date : 2013-08-27
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Tue 07 Aug 2018, 8:09 pm
I agree Mick. I hope he will open up soon.
avatar
Posts : 1399
Join date : 2012-01-04
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Fri 10 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm
The wanker Doyle thinks Lee had a coke and ran into Stanton on the rear 2nd floor stairway landing.
Why would Sarah be out there.
There are no food or candy machines out there.
Besides she would, like all other office employees, take the front steps or lift to exit the building.
She would not risk putting her 300 lbs down the creaky old back stairs.
Far too risky!!
Sarah met Lee, he is not going out, he is having the soda for his lunch.
Lunch he ate in the Domino room and after perhaps Shelley saw Lee on the first floor before having a bite of his own lunch(?)
Which all interactions logically happen near the front egress not the rear.
Utter wanker

Next he will prove Sarah's roaming girth was reason for reinforcement of all the floors with an extra sheet of plywood....
avatar
Posts : 948
Join date : 2014-08-03
Age : 55
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 12 Aug 2018, 4:07 am
Things are not going well for Brian. Stinkys latest posts should leave Brian in no doubt that he is just a little bitch.......a pathetic whore if you will. Should he whinge too much he'll be banned.
Perhaps he can console himself on Gilbrides warm tit.

_________________

You ain't gonna know what you learn if you knew it....... confused


Checkmate.

avatar
Posts : 1039
Join date : 2015-07-21
View user profilehttp://www.prayer-man.com/

Re: Prayer Man

on Sun 12 Aug 2018, 6:09 pm
Duncan MacRae, I think you should be aware that Richard Gilbride uses Brian Doyle's login details at your forum or if he is more careful dictates his messages for Doyle to post. The first is easy to check thru the account's IPs used, logged in as BD.
If not he is dictating and emailing it to him.

How do I know this?

The sentencing and wording is a complete give away. Doyle never mentioned hoaxers ever before in any of his posts until a few days ago that post reads like a Gilbride post. But now on page 173 the investigation into the films up the chain was assumely done by RG ( mind you he did as much about it as everything else he claims to have done). Doyle cannot even post a picture let alone investigate the imagery deeper. 

You and I, do not see eye to eye on quite a few things and one could construe this as me trying to influence you in removing his membership.

I am glad to be proven wrong, but this is the 2nd or 3rd instance that Gilbride is writing rebuttals for Doyle. And they differ in no way when it comes to quality of content between the two of them. They amount to bugger all actually. Doyle did a fab thing tho, he killed the second floor lunch room encounter even more without realising it. Brian you will get the credit for this.
avatar
Posts : 1399
Join date : 2012-01-04
View user profile

Re: Prayer Man

Today at 4:26 am
Classy.
Shit in his eye and offer a hanky.
Nicely done.
Cheers. Ed
avatar
Posts : 3155
Join date : 2013-09-03
Age : 65
View user profilehttps://prayermanleeharveyoswald.blogspot.com/

Re: Prayer Man

Today at 5:02 am
steely dan wrote:Perhaps he can console himself on Gilbrides warm tit.

Ms Gilbride is a fine wet-nurse to the unwanted, the rejected, and those banned.
Sponsored content

Re: Prayer Man

Back to top
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum