- GuestGuest
Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Thu 19 Jun 2014, 2:51 am
Just when we thought we had enough on our plate trying to make sense of a thousand different fabrications and lies here is a document containing a shit load of photos that were displayed to Marina to ID. There are some interesting items included that we can discuss and try to make sense of but I figured I'd give everyone a chance to have a look through. If anyone finds one that they have a question or concern about then copy it into a post and we can see what we can work out.
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=95864&relPageId=1
N.B. There were some photos within this collection that Ruth Paine said were hers and Michael's property. Whenever these pair forced their way into anything concerning the physical evidence we need to take notice.
Enjoy...
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=95864&relPageId=1
N.B. There were some photos within this collection that Ruth Paine said were hers and Michael's property. Whenever these pair forced their way into anything concerning the physical evidence we need to take notice.
Enjoy...
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Thu 19 Jun 2014, 3:21 am
Thanks, Lee.
Something else to squeeze into my already overcrowded schedule.
As grainy as they are in reproduction, it is going to take a while.
Something else to squeeze into my already overcrowded schedule.
As grainy as they are in reproduction, it is going to take a while.
_________________
If God had intended Man to do anything except copulate, He would have given us brains.
- - - Ignatz Verbotham
- GuestGuest
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Thu 19 Jun 2014, 7:30 am
Thanks Lee. I am looking forward to this now that Spain has had an early exit from the WC.Hello Goodbye wrote:Just when we thought we had enough on our plate trying to make sense of a thousand different fabrications and lies here is a document containing a shit load of photos that were displayed to Marina to ID. There are some interesting items included that we can discuss and try to make sense of but I figured I'd give everyone a chance to have a look through. If anyone finds one that they have a question or concern about then copy it into a post and we can see what we can work out.
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=95864&relPageId=1
N.B. There were some photos within this collection that Ruth Paine said were hers and Michael's property. Whenever these pair forced their way into anything concerning the physical evidence we need to take notice.
Enjoy...
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Thu 19 Jun 2014, 11:12 pm
Is it just me or does it seem the photographs do not seem to follow the index... And why isn't there any ID on the individual photos?
Did I overlook a "key" somewhere?
Did I overlook a "key" somewhere?
_________________
If God had intended Man to do anything except copulate, He would have given us brains.
- - - Ignatz Verbotham
- GuestGuest
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Fri 20 Jun 2014, 9:25 am
Terry, I am finding the index a bit of a dogs breakfast too to follow. I might just print up the index and try following it as I view them.
I am more interested in the U.S photos and which ones were taken with the Imperial Reflex. I am yet to be convinced Oswald owned it but of course I could be wrong.
I am more interested in the U.S photos and which ones were taken with the Imperial Reflex. I am yet to be convinced Oswald owned it but of course I could be wrong.
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Fri 20 Jun 2014, 9:54 am
Bastards. It's a conspiracy! All they had to do was beat bloody Chile to keep Oz alive.Paul Klein wrote:Thanks Lee. I am looking forward to this now that Spain has had an early exit from the WC.Hello Goodbye wrote:Just when we thought we had enough on our plate trying to make sense of a thousand different fabrications and lies here is a document containing a shit load of photos that were displayed to Marina to ID. There are some interesting items included that we can discuss and try to make sense of but I figured I'd give everyone a chance to have a look through. If anyone finds one that they have a question or concern about then copy it into a post and we can see what we can work out.
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=95864&relPageId=1
N.B. There were some photos within this collection that Ruth Paine said were hers and Michael's property. Whenever these pair forced their way into anything concerning the physical evidence we need to take notice.
Enjoy...
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
- GuestGuest
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Fri 20 Jun 2014, 10:22 am
I don't know what dispatches you have been given, Greg, but Spain emphatically denies these charges. Just wait for the WC report from FIFA to come out. It will prove Chile alone killed the Oz's hopes.greg parker wrote:Bastards. It's a conspiracy! All they had to do was beat bloody Chile to keep Oz alive.Paul Klein wrote:Thanks Lee. I am looking forward to this now that Spain has had an early exit from the WC.Hello Goodbye wrote:Just when we thought we had enough on our plate trying to make sense of a thousand different fabrications and lies here is a document containing a shit load of photos that were displayed to Marina to ID. There are some interesting items included that we can discuss and try to make sense of but I figured I'd give everyone a chance to have a look through. If anyone finds one that they have a question or concern about then copy it into a post and we can see what we can work out.
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=95864&relPageId=1
N.B. There were some photos within this collection that Ruth Paine said were hers and Michael's property. Whenever these pair forced their way into anything concerning the physical evidence we need to take notice.
Enjoy...
You're just a kook, Parker.
My tip for the tournament is just to sit back and enjoy watching the women they focus on. Especially the Argentine and Russian ladies. Win win.
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Fri 20 Jun 2014, 10:38 am
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Fri 20 Jun 2014, 2:45 pm
Well!PK wrote: You're just a kook, Parker.
I may be a kook, but I'm not a crackpot! Go Colombia!
I had doubts that he owned it too... but have had to rethink thanks to Lee and others.I am more interested in the U.S photos and which ones were taken with the Imperial Reflex. I am yet to be convinced Oswald owned it but of course I could be wrong.
Not that I've done a complete back-flip yet. There is suggestive evidence either way.
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Fri 20 Jun 2014, 5:09 pm
I finished going through the pictures and I have an observation. The Harvey and Lee gang say that the doppelgangers look close to each other but are different. (A certain Texas loyer recently said "I actually do not think they look that much alike. Not even like brothers to me.")Hello Goodbye wrote:Just when we thought we had enough on our plate trying to make sense of a thousand different fabrications and lies here is a document containing a shit load of photos that were displayed to Marina to ID. There are some interesting items included that we can discuss and try to make sense of but I figured I'd give everyone a chance to have a look through. If anyone finds one that they have a question or concern about then copy it into a post and we can see what we can work out.
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=95864&relPageId=1
N.B. There were some photos within this collection that Ruth Paine said were hers and Michael's property. Whenever these pair forced their way into anything concerning the physical evidence we need to take notice.
Enjoy...
According to scripture, if HARVEY was the one who went to Russia and married Marina—and these pictures were dug out of Ruth's little garage and shown to Marina—and Marina identified them all as her hubby Lee HARVEY Oswald (not LEE Harvey Oswald)—then take a look at these two pictures side by side:
The picture on the right resembles what I typically see put forth as LEE. So what would a picture of LEE be doing in HARVEY'S collection in Ruth Paine's little garage? And wouldn't HARVEY'S Marina be able to tell the difference between her husband and LEE? (In other words, is Marina as good as the Texas loyer?)
It's late and I don't even know if I'm making sense.
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Fri 20 Jun 2014, 10:54 pm
Stan Dane wrote:A certain Texas loyer recently said "I actually do not think they look that much alike. Not even like brothers to me."
It's late and I don't even know if I'm making sense.
Stan,
I think yer loyer friend has got it all wrong. Not only do they closely resemble each other, I think they might be twins!
Except that the guy on the right seems to have visited with the Brylcreem a little longer.
MARINA: Lee, why you use so much Brylcreem? A little dab'll do ya!
LEE: Yabba dabba do!
HARVEY: What, me worry?
(It's early and I don't know if I'm making any sense either.)
_________________
If God had intended Man to do anything except copulate, He would have given us brains.
- - - Ignatz Verbotham
Re: Photographs Displayed to Marina for Identification
Fri 20 Jun 2014, 11:38 pm
Note to self: when using sarcasm make sure it's understandable. Not sure it was. I was just trying to point out the absurdity of some of the claims made by the H&L folks, as I see it. Better be careful though; they may think H&L was the inspiration communist subversive, Alfred E. Neuman. I can see the new threads now…
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|