Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
+14
Phil_Hopley
barto
rogerhucek
Ed.Ledoux
steely_dan
TerryWMartin
Redfern
BC_II
Jake_Sykes
alex_wilson
StanDane
greg_parker
Goban_Saor
Vinny
18 posters
- Vinny
- Posts : 3021
Join date : 2013-08-27
Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Wed 10 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
First topic message reminder :
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/why-officer-tippit-stopped-his-killer
New article at Jim's site. Claims that Officer Tippit was likely murdered in an attempt to further the same conspiracy.
Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/why-officer-tippit-stopped-his-killer
New article at Jim's site. Claims that Officer Tippit was likely murdered in an attempt to further the same conspiracy.
_________________
Out With Bill Shelley In Front.
- Jake_Sykes
- Posts : 1015
Join date : 2016-08-15
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Wed 17 Jul 2019, 1:44 pm
As Goban mentioned earlier, I've offered up my basis for thinking that it is entirely possible that the two rare events, JFKA and the murder of a police officer, can easily have occurred together in time and in placement i.e. both in Dallas on the day and as separated by 40 minutes or whatever, while being unrelated to each other. It doesn't exclude the possibility they were related, but is not evidence to that effect, in and of itself.
I do take seriously nevertheless the conviction that many including Goban retain that such a coincidence is virtually impossible without a conspiratorial connection. This makes me consider; if these two rare events were indeed unrelated, were the JFKA conspirators motivated to force that connection anyway by virtue of the knowledge that the public would never accept any such randomly occurring scenario?
Did killing Oswald in the theater really require the Tippet killing? Couldn't the police have all rushed the TT on an APB of the missing TSBD suspect seen entering the TT without Tippet ever happening? I think they could have, but as it turned out had no choice but to make the Tippet murder part of the official story; not out of the desire to bolster their Oswald is the assassin story, but out of necessity in presenting an Oswald is the assassin story that the public would ever accept. The timing and facts of it all are so very forced. Why risk that if they didn't have to, unless of course they felt that they really did have to?
I do take seriously nevertheless the conviction that many including Goban retain that such a coincidence is virtually impossible without a conspiratorial connection. This makes me consider; if these two rare events were indeed unrelated, were the JFKA conspirators motivated to force that connection anyway by virtue of the knowledge that the public would never accept any such randomly occurring scenario?
Did killing Oswald in the theater really require the Tippet killing? Couldn't the police have all rushed the TT on an APB of the missing TSBD suspect seen entering the TT without Tippet ever happening? I think they could have, but as it turned out had no choice but to make the Tippet murder part of the official story; not out of the desire to bolster their Oswald is the assassin story, but out of necessity in presenting an Oswald is the assassin story that the public would ever accept. The timing and facts of it all are so very forced. Why risk that if they didn't have to, unless of course they felt that they really did have to?
_________________
Release clear scans. Reveal the truth about Prayer Man. Preserve the history of the assassination of JFK.
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Wed 17 Jul 2019, 2:35 pm
In reality, the two events are related no matter which scenario you buy into. There is nothing in probability theory that suggests they have to be related by a conspiracy of any sort.Jake Sykes wrote:As Goban mentioned earlier, I've offered up my basis for thinking that it is entirely possible that the two rare events, JFKA and the murder of a police officer, can easily have occurred together in time and in placement i.e. both in Dallas on the day and as separated by 40 minutes or whatever, while being unrelated to each other. It doesn't exclude the possibility they were related, but is not evidence to that effect, in and of itself.
I do take seriously nevertheless the conviction that many including Goban retain that such a coincidence is virtually impossible without a conspiratorial connection. This makes me consider; if these two rare events were indeed unrelated, were the JFKA conspirators motivated to force that connection anyway by virtue of the knowledge that the public would never accept any such randomly occurring scenario?
Did killing Oswald in the theater really require the Tippet killing? Couldn't the police have all rushed the TT on an APB of the missing TSBD suspect seen entering the TT without Tippet ever happening? I think they could have, but as it turned out had no choice but to make the Tippet murder part of the official story; not out of the desire to bolster their Oswald is the assassin story, but out of necessity in presenting an Oswald is the assassin story that the public would ever accept. The timing and facts of it all are so very forced. Why risk that if they didn't have to, unless of course they felt that they really did have to?
WC scenario... if both murders were by the same "Lone Nut", the murders are related.
If Tippit was murdered to help frame Oswald on JFK, the events are related
If Tippit was murdered because he was sent in to cover the area due to the assassination draining said area, and the murderer was a parolee and part of a criminal gang that was paying the regular patrolman to turn a blind eye... then the two murders are related because the second would not have happened if not for the first (because the regular patrolman would have answered the call to the fight and the parolee would not have been in danger of being arrested)
We all agree that the WC version is crap.
We all know that the second version is the most popular.
But for myself and maybe some others here... I just have too many issues with it from studying the actual evidence.
In a Tippit ambush plot, why not ambush him in his own patrol area.. why go to the hassle and convoluted scenario of draining the area and then sending Tippit in?
In a Tippit ambush plot, why would the shells not match the weapon allegedly used (per Hill's original ID of said shells)?
In a Tippit ambush plot (recalling that the purpose is to frame Oswald) why the snafu with wallets and IDs?
In a Tippit ambush plot, would you really stage a fight where someone appears to be stabbed and bundled into a car? Would you then disperse and relying on luck that he finds one of you?
It's the most haphazard and ill-conceived ambush plot in history...
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
- Mick_Purdy
- Posts : 2359
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Wed 17 Jul 2019, 2:43 pm
Jake, your post makes a lot of sense at least to me anyway. Whilst I cannot entirely discount that the two events are related or connected in some way, I find it almost inconceivable that the conspirators needed a cop killing to bolster any frame against Oswald.
The whole aftermath, of the Beckley rooming house, the cab trip to the area, the bus transfer, the bus trip etc. as near as I can tell were all fabricated after the fact to place him in the vicinity. And we do know now by whom. To my mind it keeps coming back to Fritz, Decker and Bill Alexander and a handful of other cops.
I do however understand why so many may think that the two events were connected. I just happen to see crooked cops everywhere in this.
The whole aftermath, of the Beckley rooming house, the cab trip to the area, the bus transfer, the bus trip etc. as near as I can tell were all fabricated after the fact to place him in the vicinity. And we do know now by whom. To my mind it keeps coming back to Fritz, Decker and Bill Alexander and a handful of other cops.
I do however understand why so many may think that the two events were connected. I just happen to see crooked cops everywhere in this.
_________________
I'm just a patsy!

- Mick_Purdy
- Posts : 2359
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Wed 17 Jul 2019, 3:58 pm
I agree Greg. It's why I can't buy into the Tippit killing being part of the assassination plot. Keep asking myself why? The cop killing wasn't needed. At least to my mind. The planted , manufactured fabricated evidence which placed Oswald in the vicinity of Tippit's murder all came after the fact. To my mind that's why the ambush plot comes across as almost farcical. The cops twisted, added, skewed all the so called evidence to make Oswald the Tippit killer. In my opinion that's why nothing about Oswald being the perp doesn't sit right, it just doesn't jibe when we look at it closely. It's all made up, make believe.greg parker wrote:In reality, the two events are related no matter which scenario you buy into. There is nothing in probability theory that suggests they have to be related by a conspiracy of any sort.Jake Sykes wrote:As Goban mentioned earlier, I've offered up my basis for thinking that it is entirely possible that the two rare events, JFKA and the murder of a police officer, can easily have occurred together in time and in placement i.e. both in Dallas on the day and as separated by 40 minutes or whatever, while being unrelated to each other. It doesn't exclude the possibility they were related, but is not evidence to that effect, in and of itself.
I do take seriously nevertheless the conviction that many including Goban retain that such a coincidence is virtually impossible without a conspiratorial connection. This makes me consider; if these two rare events were indeed unrelated, were the JFKA conspirators motivated to force that connection anyway by virtue of the knowledge that the public would never accept any such randomly occurring scenario?
Did killing Oswald in the theater really require the Tippet killing? Couldn't the police have all rushed the TT on an APB of the missing TSBD suspect seen entering the TT without Tippet ever happening? I think they could have, but as it turned out had no choice but to make the Tippet murder part of the official story; not out of the desire to bolster their Oswald is the assassin story, but out of necessity in presenting an Oswald is the assassin story that the public would ever accept. The timing and facts of it all are so very forced. Why risk that if they didn't have to, unless of course they felt that they really did have to?
WC scenario... if both murders were by the same "Lone Nut", the murders are related.
If Tippit was murdered to help frame Oswald on JFK, the events are related
If Tippit was murdered because he was sent in to cover the area due to the assassination draining said area, and the murderer was a parolee and part of a criminal gang that was paying the regular patrolman to turn a blind eye... then the two murders are related because the second would not have happened if not for the first (because the regular patrolman would have answered the call to the fight and the parolee would not have been in danger of being arrested)
We all agree that the WC version is crap.
We all know that the second version is the most popular.
But for myself and maybe some others here... I just have too many issues with it from studying the actual evidence.
In a Tippit ambush plot, why not ambush him in his own patrol area.. why go to the hassle and convoluted scenario of draining the area and then sending Tippit in?
In a Tippit ambush plot, why would the shells not match the weapon allegedly used (per Hill's original ID of said shells)?
In a Tippit ambush plot (recalling that the purpose is to frame Oswald) why the snafu with wallets and IDs?
In a Tippit ambush plot, would you really stage a fight where someone appears to be stabbed and bundled into a car? Would you then disperse and relying on luck that he finds one of you?
It's the most haphazard and ill-conceived ambush plot in history...
Oswald was hauled in at about 2.00pm to HQ's. Fritz was called from the TSBD to come up to see the suspect. Decker wanted to see Fritz before he got to the suspect, so they met in Deckers office. I smell a giant Rat here. What did Fritz meet Decker about and why? And why would Fritz delay in getting to the suspect. A suspect by all accounts who was in custody for Killing Kennedy.
To me this reeks of something on the fly, on the run.
_________________
I'm just a patsy!

- Vinny
- Posts : 3021
Join date : 2013-08-27
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Wed 17 Jul 2019, 6:00 pm
Another theory that is advocated by some is that Tippit was killed by a jealous husband of a woman he was having an affair with.
_________________
Out With Bill Shelley In Front.
- Jake_Sykes
- Posts : 1015
Join date : 2016-08-15
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Thu 18 Jul 2019, 2:54 am
It does reek Mick. Such a muddled mess of what should be a simple series of facts and observations as collected by trained police professionals.
Greg's notes regarding the perp being boxed by Tippet's unexpected presence on the scene makes total sense. That the events were related in that way really works. The WC would then have been boxed as well, this time by the DPD's prompt evidentiary assertions, ragged as they were.
Greg's notes regarding the perp being boxed by Tippet's unexpected presence on the scene makes total sense. That the events were related in that way really works. The WC would then have been boxed as well, this time by the DPD's prompt evidentiary assertions, ragged as they were.
_________________
Release clear scans. Reveal the truth about Prayer Man. Preserve the history of the assassination of JFK.
- BC_II
- Posts : 160
Join date : 2017-06-02
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Thu 18 Jul 2019, 9:54 am
This is a fascinating, mature and respectful debate here. Thanks to you all for being critical in your thinking and analysis. Really helps when it should be a standard anyway when investing in this complex case. Greg, would you say that Tippit was involved in the conspiracy from a planning perspective? So, if I am to understand you correctly, you don't believe he was murdered as part of the planning but that may have happened due to a 'hiccup' or unforseen circumstance? I will definitely through this entire topic a few more times to get a better grasp on you guys' thinking and positions of course.
- Mick_Purdy
- Posts : 2359
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Thu 18 Jul 2019, 10:15 am
I'm open to any theory on this which ever way it falls as long as it stands up.
Unless I'm missing something, if we take the view that the Tippit killing was part of a conspiratorial plan or ambush and in some way was connected or related to the Kennedy assassination then we have to consider the following. It's almost certain there was a disturbance call to the 400 block area. It is almost certain that Tippit was assigned to that call. To an area he didn't normally patrol. This would mean that the assigned /designated police officer who was dispatched to that disturbance call was somehow lured to that area. My question would be, lured by whom and why?
Unless I'm missing something, if we take the view that the Tippit killing was part of a conspiratorial plan or ambush and in some way was connected or related to the Kennedy assassination then we have to consider the following. It's almost certain there was a disturbance call to the 400 block area. It is almost certain that Tippit was assigned to that call. To an area he didn't normally patrol. This would mean that the assigned /designated police officer who was dispatched to that disturbance call was somehow lured to that area. My question would be, lured by whom and why?
_________________
I'm just a patsy!

- Jake_Sykes
- Posts : 1015
Join date : 2016-08-15
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Thu 18 Jul 2019, 1:19 pm
Mick, I think what Greg has suggested (I trust he'll correct me if I'm wrong) is that the disturbance was a real one, not intended to lure Tippet, but that due to the assassination, it was Tippet who responded. That happened because the regular cop had been reassigned to Dealey (I believe it was) by dispatch, so Tippet in turn was ordered away from his regular beat to fill the void that was left open in Oak Cliff by the regular cop's reassignment. The regular cop would have been very well known and "friendly" to the perp and no cop would have been killed. He did kill Tippet though because Tippet was serious about taking him in and that wasn't going to happen. That became the mess DPD had to promptly clean up by pinning it on Oswald in addition to the assassination, hence the muddled mess of 'evidence'.
So the "relatedness" of Tippet's murder to the assassination is in the nature of it's having been precipitated by the assassination resulting in reassignments of officers to different areas of the City, but without pre-planning of Tippet's murder having occurred by the assassination planners. All speculation of course.
Just an aside with the Glocko station and Tippet being there. Perhaps simply a matter of watching a pinch point for people coming over to Oak Cliff from Dealey. Just be at the ready to block the road and to see what there was to see coming in from over there following the assassination. Then the disturbance call and away he goes.
So the "relatedness" of Tippet's murder to the assassination is in the nature of it's having been precipitated by the assassination resulting in reassignments of officers to different areas of the City, but without pre-planning of Tippet's murder having occurred by the assassination planners. All speculation of course.
Just an aside with the Glocko station and Tippet being there. Perhaps simply a matter of watching a pinch point for people coming over to Oak Cliff from Dealey. Just be at the ready to block the road and to see what there was to see coming in from over there following the assassination. Then the disturbance call and away he goes.
_________________
Release clear scans. Reveal the truth about Prayer Man. Preserve the history of the assassination of JFK.
- Mick_Purdy
- Posts : 2359
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Thu 18 Jul 2019, 1:32 pm
Exactly Jake,
Greg's notes regarding the perp being boxed by Tippet's unexpected presence on the scene makes total sense. That the events were related in that way really works. The WC would then have been boxed as well, this time by the DPD's prompt evidentiary assertions, ragged as they were.
And boxed they all were, once that rifle had been discovered in at the TSBD around 1.10pm and Oswald had been hauled in at about 2.00pm thereafter, Alexander, Fritz and Co went to work. By 6.00pm Saturday 23rd November in at Police HQ's Oswald was shown an enlargement of the Backyard photo 133a with he holding a Carcano rifle. Any Carcano would do - it mattered little. His fate was sealed.
The crooked line ups, false sightings, fictionary Oswald boarding houses near the Tippit murder scene, Bus transfers which were planted, compliant lying witnesses, planted guns and rifles, communist literature, faked photos - on and on it goes.
Greg's notes regarding the perp being boxed by Tippet's unexpected presence on the scene makes total sense. That the events were related in that way really works. The WC would then have been boxed as well, this time by the DPD's prompt evidentiary assertions, ragged as they were.
And boxed they all were, once that rifle had been discovered in at the TSBD around 1.10pm and Oswald had been hauled in at about 2.00pm thereafter, Alexander, Fritz and Co went to work. By 6.00pm Saturday 23rd November in at Police HQ's Oswald was shown an enlargement of the Backyard photo 133a with he holding a Carcano rifle. Any Carcano would do - it mattered little. His fate was sealed.
The crooked line ups, false sightings, fictionary Oswald boarding houses near the Tippit murder scene, Bus transfers which were planted, compliant lying witnesses, planted guns and rifles, communist literature, faked photos - on and on it goes.
_________________
I'm just a patsy!

- Mick_Purdy
- Posts : 2359
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Thu 18 Jul 2019, 1:42 pm
Sorry if my post was confusing Jake.Jake Sykes wrote:Mick, I think what Greg has suggested (I trust he'll correct me if I'm wrong) is that the disturbance was a real one, not intended to lure Tippet, but that due to the assassination, it was Tippet who responded. That happened because the regular cop had been reassigned to Dealey (I believe it was) by dispatch, so Tippet in turn was ordered away from his regular beat to fill the void that was left open in Oak Cliff by the regular cop's reassignment. The regular cop would have been very well known and "friendly" to the perp and no cop would have been killed. He did kill Tippet though because Tippet was serious about taking him in and that wasn't going to happen. That became the mess DPD had to promptly clean up by pinning it on Oswald in addition to the assassination, hence the muddled mess of 'evidence'.
So the "relatedness" of Tippet's murder to the assassination is in the nature of it's having been precipitated by the assassination resulting in reassignments of officers to different areas of the City, but without pre-planning of Tippet's murder having occurred by the assassination planners. All speculation of course.
Just an aside with the Glocko station and Tippet being there. Perhaps simply a matter of watching a pinch point for people coming over to Oak Cliff from Dealey. Just be at the ready to block the road and to see what there was to see coming in from over there following the assassination. Then the disturbance call and away he goes.
I'm in total agreeance with the theory of the disturbance call and Tippit showing up for that and being killed by the people who had been reported for causing the disturbance in the first place. Just to be clear.
In no way at least with what I've read so far am I convinced or swayed in any way to believe Tippit was ambushed or killed as part of the assassination plot by the conspirators. So yes the relatedness of the assassination to the Tippit murder is for the fact that The Dallas Police in my opinion framed Oswald for both Kennedy's murder and also Tippit's killing.
In effect, the real killers of both Kennedy and Tippit remained at large.
_________________
I'm just a patsy!

Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Thu 18 Jul 2019, 2:34 pm
Thanks Jake. I'd been struggling to get it out in a way that doesn't sound more convoluted than what it was. You nailed it. And yes, all speculation, but based on bits and pieces of information, both open and buried.Jake Sykes wrote:Mick, I think what Greg has suggested (I trust he'll correct me if I'm wrong) is that the disturbance was a real one, not intended to lure Tippet, but that due to the assassination, it was Tippet who responded. That happened because the regular cop had been reassigned to Dealey (I believe it was) by dispatch, so Tippet in turn was ordered away from his regular beat to fill the void that was left open in Oak Cliff by the regular cop's reassignment. The regular cop would have been very well known and "friendly" to the perp and no cop would have been killed. He did kill Tippet though because Tippet was serious about taking him in and that wasn't going to happen. That became the mess DPD had to promptly clean up by pinning it on Oswald in addition to the assassination, hence the muddled mess of 'evidence'.
So the "relatedness" of Tippet's murder to the assassination is in the nature of it's having been precipitated by the assassination resulting in reassignments of officers to different areas of the City, but without pre-planning of Tippet's murder having occurred by the assassination planners. All speculation of course.
Just an aside with the Glocko station and Tippet being there. Perhaps simply a matter of watching a pinch point for people coming over to Oak Cliff from Dealey. Just be at the ready to block the road and to see what there was to see coming in from over there following the assassination. Then the disturbance call and away he goes.
The one thing here I d disagree with is Tippit being at the GLOCO.
From my Tippit essay
Gloco Gas Station, 1502 North Zangs 12:45 PM – 1:00 According to Drenas, former FBI agent William Turner tracked down 5 witnesses to Tippit being at the Gloco Gas Station between 12:45 PM and 1: 00 PM on the day of the assassination. This was for a 1966 Ramparts article. These witnesses were photographer Al Volkland and his wife, Lou, and Gloco employees Tom Mullins, Emmett Hollingshead and JB ͞Shorty͟ Lewis. According to the witnesses, Tippit appeared to be watching the traffic coming over the Houston St viaduct for about 10 minutes or so before ͞tearing off͟ down Lancaster. The problems with this story are many.
1.It is not explained how Turner found these witnesses.
2.All 5 witnesses claimed to know Tippit – yet this gas station was not near his home, nor was it in his assigned patrol area.
3.The police radio logs show he called in his location as ͞about Keist and Bonnie View͟ at 12:45 PM. This was within his assigned area and is about 5 miles from the Gloco. At 12:54, he gave his location as Lancaster and Eighth.
4.Calling in false locations to cover being outside your assigned area would seem foolhardy. What if an emergency occurred within a block of the called location, and the dispatcher, believing that to be his location, sends him to deal with it? How is he going to explain the length of time it takes him to get there?
5.Drenas asserts that there is no indication that any of these 5 witnesses were ever interviewed by any investigative body. This is not true. Both Mullins and Lewis were interviewed, along with another employee, James Sutton – Mullins on Feb 10, 1964 and the other two a week later.
6.The interviews were conducted because of information received to the effect that both Ruby and Oswald had been customers of the station in the past.
7.The information had come from the Austin brother of Bill Winter of Minnesota who was looking for the site of the assassination. Winter had taken a wrong road and pulled into the Gloco for directions. He was told about Ruby and Oswald being customers during that discussion.
8.It was obvious from the interviews of the employees, that the Gloco, with its mix of local and intra and interstate customers, was to the Dallas assassination rumor industry what Mary was to typhoid.
9.None of the three admitted remembering Winter. However, they did indicate that they had many people stopping for directions to Dealey Plaza. All three also denied that Oswald was a customer, while agreeing that Ruby had been.
10.Most important of all – none took the opportunity to tell the FBI that Tippit had been to the station acting like a lookout shortly before he was killed. The story picked up by Turner and pursued since by others is no more than a classic example of good ol’ boy Texan story telling. They wanted to be helpful to all those nice authors to the point that they even gratuitously threw in that Tippit ͞tore off͟ in the direction of Ruby’s apartment - and those nice authors reciprocated by asking none of the hard questions – starting with how did they all knew Tippit when he did not live or work in that area, and why not one of them contacted authorities with this important information – information they knew full well would be important if true – hence the specific mention of Tippit heading in Ruby’s direction.
https://www.thenewdisease.space/tippit
In my conclusions in that essay, I stated that if any cop was at the GLOCO, it was RC Nelson.
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
- Jake_Sykes
- Posts : 1015
Join date : 2016-08-15
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Thu 18 Jul 2019, 9:38 pm
I didn't recall all your work on Gloco Greg. As usual, there are so many holes in what is taken for granite. No problem revising my thinking on that piece. Thanks for helping with that.
_________________
Release clear scans. Reveal the truth about Prayer Man. Preserve the history of the assassination of JFK.
- Redfern
- Posts : 110
Join date : 2013-08-27
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Fri 19 Jul 2019, 5:21 pm
I disagree with Greg's general view of the Tippit case.
Given that Tippit was only the third Dallas police officer to be killed by gunfire since the war and that Oswald was arrested a short distance away not long thereafter, it is very unlikely that these events were not linked to the presidential assassination.
https://www.odmp.org/agency/924-dallas-police-department-texas
The wallet “found” at the Tippit murder scene, the contents of which were discussed by Westbrook and Barrett, was a plant. (I believe even Fritz thought it was too obvious and shuffled the contents to another found on Oswald - this was argued by Robert Charles-Dunne.) In conjunction with the MC rifle which was discovered around the same time, the key “evidence” against Oswald was in place even before his arrest.
The likeliest scenario for me is that Tippit was singled out as a sacrificial lamb to bolster the case against Oswald, presumably with the aim of ensuring his imminent demise in the Texas Theatre at the hands of police. However, most involved in what they believed to be the plan were not working to this agenda and I think that applies to almost all DPD officers (Murray Jackson, for example, was a friend of Tippit). There is a chance Tippit was originally tasked with killing Oswald, took cold feet and then paid the price, but the narrow time-scales involved would seem to work against that scenario. Then again, the presence of Carl Mather’s car seems to open up other, more elaborate, possibilities as to what Tippit at least thought he was involved in.
While stories like Tippit-was-Badgeman are clearly fanciful, Joseph McBride was correct to focus on William Mentzel (91). This is one guy who was relatively ignored by researchers even although his actions seem highly suspicious (he was supposedly on a lunch-break throughout the period following the assassination in a restaurant two blocks from the Texas Theatre). The testimony from Kenneth Croy and Harry Olsen is so unconvincing it places them as key suspects in my book.
Tippit was several miles from his patrol area and the reason given by Jackson for his presence in north-east Oak Cliff is not credible. Several officers were in or very close to this area. One – C T Walker (56) – actually reported he was on East Jefferson seconds before Jackson’s 12:45 instruction* to R C Nelson (87) and Tippit (78). Additionally, Jackson’s dialogue with Tippit seems very stilted (“You will be at large for any emergency that comes in”) and pays undue attention to what was ostensibly a mundane policing task.
The house outside which Tippit was shot matches the address given by Jack Ruby for Joyce McDonald (Joy Dale) and correlates with “... the apartment house where he (Tippit) lives in...” part of Virginia Davis’s testimony. In other words, this encounter was unlikely to be random – I believe Tippit knew his killer.
Intriguing factors in the Tippit conundrum which have never really been explained are:
1) The Mather car at the El Chico restaurant with the Oswald lookalike.
2) Leona Miller giving the same phone number noted in the Carousel Club as that reported by the Davis sisters-in-law.
The article from Jack Myers references the story about a “fight at Marsalis and 12th” which has now morphed into a “stabbing at Marsalis and 10th” of which there were “many witnesses” (although none has ever come forward). Such an event would seem like the ideal pretext to explain Tippit’s presence in the north-eastern section of Oak Cliff – a major dilemma facing DPD. We’d really need a lot more evidence to take this at face value.
The James Andrews story strikes me as being fictitious. It only emerged when a researcher approached him to ask about Roscoe White. Why would anyone sit on a something like this for years? The location where this incident was supposed to have occurred also conflicts with any reasonable timeline for Tippit’s last few minutes.
I keep an open mind about the Top Ten Record Shop claim – it may be true, but why did we only hear about it nearly 20 years later? Then again, Tippit did miss a radio call around this time – unanswered calls were rare and according to the Bill Drenas article one of only 5 or so in his DPD career. Noticeably, Mentzel also missed a call shortly after finally returning from his lunch-break.
I’d have thought the GLOCO service station sighting was reliable, although it doesn’t really prove much one way or the other. There is a chance it may have been Unit 101 (supposedly driven by B L Bass but it may have been another officer) which sent a message at 12:48 that it was on the south side of the Houston Street viaduct. I don’t believe Oswald would have taken this route from Dealey Plaza anyway.
If he was giving an accurate account, Tippit’s “Lancaster and 8th” response to Murray Jackson at 12:54 would place him between Kay Coleman’s apartment and the 7/11 store she referred to in her testimony – and, presumably, very close to the “estate” Harry Olsen was supposedly guarding.
* Nelson simply ignored this instruction and in an interview for CBS Miami 50 years later was still obfuscating:
https://miami.cbslocal.com/2013/11/20/exclusive-jfk-assassination-witness-speaks-for-1st-time/
Was the instruction (and others) over-dubbed later? Both Nelson and Tippit respond as if asked about their current location. Whether there was some manipulation of the recording of DPD radio transmissions after the “open mic” episode is a research area that could prove fruitful.
Given that Tippit was only the third Dallas police officer to be killed by gunfire since the war and that Oswald was arrested a short distance away not long thereafter, it is very unlikely that these events were not linked to the presidential assassination.
https://www.odmp.org/agency/924-dallas-police-department-texas
The wallet “found” at the Tippit murder scene, the contents of which were discussed by Westbrook and Barrett, was a plant. (I believe even Fritz thought it was too obvious and shuffled the contents to another found on Oswald - this was argued by Robert Charles-Dunne.) In conjunction with the MC rifle which was discovered around the same time, the key “evidence” against Oswald was in place even before his arrest.
The likeliest scenario for me is that Tippit was singled out as a sacrificial lamb to bolster the case against Oswald, presumably with the aim of ensuring his imminent demise in the Texas Theatre at the hands of police. However, most involved in what they believed to be the plan were not working to this agenda and I think that applies to almost all DPD officers (Murray Jackson, for example, was a friend of Tippit). There is a chance Tippit was originally tasked with killing Oswald, took cold feet and then paid the price, but the narrow time-scales involved would seem to work against that scenario. Then again, the presence of Carl Mather’s car seems to open up other, more elaborate, possibilities as to what Tippit at least thought he was involved in.
While stories like Tippit-was-Badgeman are clearly fanciful, Joseph McBride was correct to focus on William Mentzel (91). This is one guy who was relatively ignored by researchers even although his actions seem highly suspicious (he was supposedly on a lunch-break throughout the period following the assassination in a restaurant two blocks from the Texas Theatre). The testimony from Kenneth Croy and Harry Olsen is so unconvincing it places them as key suspects in my book.
Tippit was several miles from his patrol area and the reason given by Jackson for his presence in north-east Oak Cliff is not credible. Several officers were in or very close to this area. One – C T Walker (56) – actually reported he was on East Jefferson seconds before Jackson’s 12:45 instruction* to R C Nelson (87) and Tippit (78). Additionally, Jackson’s dialogue with Tippit seems very stilted (“You will be at large for any emergency that comes in”) and pays undue attention to what was ostensibly a mundane policing task.
The house outside which Tippit was shot matches the address given by Jack Ruby for Joyce McDonald (Joy Dale) and correlates with “... the apartment house where he (Tippit) lives in...” part of Virginia Davis’s testimony. In other words, this encounter was unlikely to be random – I believe Tippit knew his killer.
Intriguing factors in the Tippit conundrum which have never really been explained are:
1) The Mather car at the El Chico restaurant with the Oswald lookalike.
2) Leona Miller giving the same phone number noted in the Carousel Club as that reported by the Davis sisters-in-law.
The article from Jack Myers references the story about a “fight at Marsalis and 12th” which has now morphed into a “stabbing at Marsalis and 10th” of which there were “many witnesses” (although none has ever come forward). Such an event would seem like the ideal pretext to explain Tippit’s presence in the north-eastern section of Oak Cliff – a major dilemma facing DPD. We’d really need a lot more evidence to take this at face value.
The James Andrews story strikes me as being fictitious. It only emerged when a researcher approached him to ask about Roscoe White. Why would anyone sit on a something like this for years? The location where this incident was supposed to have occurred also conflicts with any reasonable timeline for Tippit’s last few minutes.
I keep an open mind about the Top Ten Record Shop claim – it may be true, but why did we only hear about it nearly 20 years later? Then again, Tippit did miss a radio call around this time – unanswered calls were rare and according to the Bill Drenas article one of only 5 or so in his DPD career. Noticeably, Mentzel also missed a call shortly after finally returning from his lunch-break.
I’d have thought the GLOCO service station sighting was reliable, although it doesn’t really prove much one way or the other. There is a chance it may have been Unit 101 (supposedly driven by B L Bass but it may have been another officer) which sent a message at 12:48 that it was on the south side of the Houston Street viaduct. I don’t believe Oswald would have taken this route from Dealey Plaza anyway.
If he was giving an accurate account, Tippit’s “Lancaster and 8th” response to Murray Jackson at 12:54 would place him between Kay Coleman’s apartment and the 7/11 store she referred to in her testimony – and, presumably, very close to the “estate” Harry Olsen was supposedly guarding.
* Nelson simply ignored this instruction and in an interview for CBS Miami 50 years later was still obfuscating:
https://miami.cbslocal.com/2013/11/20/exclusive-jfk-assassination-witness-speaks-for-1st-time/
Was the instruction (and others) over-dubbed later? Both Nelson and Tippit respond as if asked about their current location. Whether there was some manipulation of the recording of DPD radio transmissions after the “open mic” episode is a research area that could prove fruitful.
- Mick_Purdy
- Posts : 2359
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Fri 19 Jul 2019, 11:18 pm
Redfern,
Given that Tippit was only the third Dallas police officer to be killed by gunfire since the war and that Oswald was arrested a short distance away not long thereafter, it is very unlikely that these events were not linked to the presidential assassination.
I respectfully disagree:
I think they were related after the fact, linked only for the fact that the Dallas police used both the Kennedy murder and the Tippit killing to implicate Oswald in both murders. Speculation yes, but just because an event may have occurred "a short distance away " from the assassination in my view does not make it connected, at least not in a planned premeditated way. And to my mind not as part of the overall plot of the Kennedy assassination.
Of course I could be wrong. I've seen nothing to indicate the two murders are part of the same plot, connected by the conspirators of the Kennedy killing.
There was a gap in the police log recordings regarding dispatch....30 seconds or more of noise at about the same time Tippit is instructed to be at large or immediately afterward....I think this is written up in Texas Theatre Theatrics somewhere with a link.
It was around this time Tippit was dispatched to the disturbance call from memory.
I just seem to find it almost inconceivable that there was something so all encompassing, to include a cop killing and a handful of conspirators to facilitate killing a cop and then covering that up and framing Oswald for it.
Given that Tippit was only the third Dallas police officer to be killed by gunfire since the war and that Oswald was arrested a short distance away not long thereafter, it is very unlikely that these events were not linked to the presidential assassination.
I respectfully disagree:
I think they were related after the fact, linked only for the fact that the Dallas police used both the Kennedy murder and the Tippit killing to implicate Oswald in both murders. Speculation yes, but just because an event may have occurred "a short distance away " from the assassination in my view does not make it connected, at least not in a planned premeditated way. And to my mind not as part of the overall plot of the Kennedy assassination.
Of course I could be wrong. I've seen nothing to indicate the two murders are part of the same plot, connected by the conspirators of the Kennedy killing.
There was a gap in the police log recordings regarding dispatch....30 seconds or more of noise at about the same time Tippit is instructed to be at large or immediately afterward....I think this is written up in Texas Theatre Theatrics somewhere with a link.
It was around this time Tippit was dispatched to the disturbance call from memory.
I just seem to find it almost inconceivable that there was something so all encompassing, to include a cop killing and a handful of conspirators to facilitate killing a cop and then covering that up and framing Oswald for it.
_________________
I'm just a patsy!

Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Sat 20 Jul 2019, 12:10 am
Hi Redfern, the first problem with this as I see it is that the default position is always one leaning to conspiracy. But any connection does not have to be via a conspiracy at all and I have already explained why that is.I disagree with Greg's general view of the Tippit case.
Given that Tippit was only the third Dallas police officer to be killed by gunfire since the war and that Oswald was arrested a short distance away not long thereafter, it is very unlikely that these events were not linked to the presidential assassination.
https://www.odmp.org/agency/924-dallas-police-department-texas
That leads to the second issue: once locked onto a conspiracy solution, you are compelled to find it. That leads to accepting bad witnesses, ignoring evidence that goes elsewhere, accepting interpretation of evidence by conspiracy authors uncritically and so on.
I'm not denying a connection. Just denying that it was a conspiratorial one
The wallet “found” at the Tippit murder scene, the contents of which were discussed by Westbrook and Barrett, was a plant. (I believe even Fritz thought it was too obvious and shuffled the contents to another found on Oswald - this was argued by Robert Charles-Dunne.) In conjunction with the MC rifle which was discovered around the same time, the key “evidence” against Oswald was in place even before his arrest.
Everyone wants to use this wallet to support their own theory.
To those who support the Lone Nut line, the wallet found at the scene belonged to Tippit.
To those who support Oswald as assassin in a foreign-led conspiracy, it was Oswald’s wallet and therefore proof that he shot Tippit.
To others still, it was a throw-down as part of a frame against Oswald and his true wallet was taken from him in the squad car after his arrest – just as the arresting officers claimed. The two who would claim that this was Oswald’s wallet and that it contained both Oswald and Hidell ID, were police reserve sergeant, Kenneth Croy and FBI agent Bob Barrett - but this was all well after the event.
Neither man wrote any report or gave sworn testimony about this wallet, nor did Captain Westbrook who was the officer who allegedly talked about it to Barrett by asking if he knew of any criminal elements named Lee Oswald or Alek Hidell.
According to Croy, a civilian handed him the wallet and he passed it onto Westbrook. According to Barrett, Westbrook found the wallet near a pool of blood. According to civilian witnesses, there was no wallet left on the ground at the time they arrived (recall that they arrived at the spot before any police).
WFAA cameraman, Ron Reiland took film of the wallet being examined by police. He later went back to the studio and provided audio for his footage as it was aired. He described the wallet as belonging to Tippit. He also described one of the witnesses as being ͞interrogated͟ by police.
The most likely scenario comes from the most unlikely source; David von Pein. DVP is a self-appointed Warren Commission defender. As such, he is prone to contort evidence he does not like so that it can be ͞debunked͟ while at the same time, sing the virtues of the evidence held aloft by the authorities. If the idea is simply to debunk, or play down conspiracy evidence, it does not follow that all such evidence needs to be ͞contorted͟ or lied about in order to achieve that goal. Simply put, a lot of the so-called evidence on both sides of the picket fence can be debunked without resort to chicanery. This is a good example.
Witness Ted Callaway had taken Tippit’s pistol and talked taxi driver William Scoggins into joining him in pursuit of the killer. On his return, he handed back the pistol to Croy and he in turn, was handed over by Croy to detectives. It was Callaway who was the subject of the interrogation described by Reiland and there can be little doubt that the police would want to check his ID as part of that. Callaway was one of the witnesses who denied any wallet was on the ground when he arrived – but that should not be construed as a denial that the police checked his wallet.
The later stories were just more of the same pushing of Oswald as Hidell. Former FBI analyst, Farris Rookstool who is one who pushes that the wallet did belonged to Oswald, has theorized that the arresting police lied about finding a wallet on Oswald in order cover up for so many police handling it. Calling this theory a stretch would not be unkind. What can be said about Rookstool’s theory is that had Oswald’s wallet with ID been found at the murder site, whether or not it was a throw-down, both names would have been radioed in and broadcast for pickup, and police dispatched to the only address in the wallet – 602 Elspeth – after all, it was just a half mile from the murder scene.
If this had any legs, I would agree that Tippit would be an ideal candidate as sacrificial lamb. There was anger and tears at news of his death... until those cops realized it was not the other Tippit who was killed...The likeliest scenario for me is that Tippit was singled out as a sacrificial lamb to bolster the case against Oswald, presumably with the aim of ensuring his imminent demise in the Texas Theatre at the hands of police. However, most involved in what they believed to be the plan were not working to this agenda and I think that applies to almost all DPD officers (Murray Jackson, for example, was a friend of Tippit). There is a chance Tippit was originally tasked with killing Oswald, took cold feet and then paid the price, but the narrow time-scales involved would seem to work against that scenario. Then again, the presence of Carl Mather’s car seems to open up other, more elaborate, possibilities as to what Tippit at least thought he was involved in.
As for Tippit being tasked with killing Oswald but getting cold feet... he already had one notch on his belt... possibly using a throw-down as the excuse for the shooting, so cold feet should not have been an issue.
On September 2, 1956 Tippit and his partner, Dale Hankins received a call to deal with a drunken patron causing a disturbance at Club 80. The bar patron was Leonard Garland, and according to the official story, when they tried to take him into custody, he pulled a pistol and attempted to shoot Tippit in the head, but the weapon failed to fire (a similar story was related regarding Oswald’s arrest). Tippit and Hankins, then drew their service revolvers and shot and killed Garland.
Apart from all that, as I've already said, a pre-planned plot could have killed him in his own area, instead of clearing another area and luring him there. It also would have matching shells at the scene to the alleged Oswald weapon. And there sure as hell wouldn't be multiple wallets floating around. Oswald could be killed at the TT without all this. It is, no pun intended, overkill that could have unraveled the whole plot.
More later
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
- Vinny
- Posts : 3021
Join date : 2013-08-27
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Sat 20 Jul 2019, 1:48 am
Maybe someone could just call Callaway and ask him if it was his wallet and end the mystery once and for all?
_________________
Out With Bill Shelley In Front.
- Mick_Purdy
- Posts : 2359
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Sat 20 Jul 2019, 9:09 am
WFAA cameraman, Ron Reiland took film of the wallet being examined by police. He later went back to the studio and provided audio for his footage as it was aired. He described the wallet as belonging to Tippit.
And that makes a whole lot of sense.
And that makes a whole lot of sense.
_________________
I'm just a patsy!

Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Sat 20 Jul 2019, 9:25 am
It does make sense, but seems to have been an assumption by Reiland only. Tippit's wallet was late shown to look different.Mick Purdy wrote:WFAA cameraman, Ron Reiland took film of the wallet being examined by police. He later went back to the studio and provided audio for his footage as it was aired. He described the wallet as belonging to Tippit.
And that makes a whole lot of sense.
What I forgot to mention before was that Calloway's gung-ho actions made everyone think he was some kind of private detective except that coming back with Scoggins in a cruiser, he gave Scoggins the pistol.... so when they got back, it was Scoggin's initially mistaken for a detective and Calloway was thought to be a suspect...
From Scoggin's testimony:
Mr. SCOGGINS. About 1:30, I guess, approximately 1:30; between 1:30 and 1:35, I would say. We cruised around several blocks looking for him, and we--one of these police cars came by and this fellow who was with me stopped it, and we got back in the car and went back up to the scene, and he give them the pistol, and that time is when I found out he wasn't an officer.
Mr. BELIN. Then what happened, or what did you do?
No one new what was what or what was happening. Everyone heard, saw and thought different things. But under the circumstances described above, with Calloway being turned over by Croy to the other cops and Scoggin's allowed to wander off...I think it's pretty obvious that the cops would want to examine Calloway's wallet.
And Vinny... yes we could ask Calloway.... but do we know if he is still alive?
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
- Mick_Purdy
- Posts : 2359
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Sat 20 Jul 2019, 9:42 am
Thanks for clearing that up Greg,
It still rings true no matter which way it's looked at. It was chaos. If it was Calloway's wallet it makes just as much sense at least to me. I suspect there was at least one cop and an assistant District Attorney on scene who wanted chaos, the more the better.
It still rings true no matter which way it's looked at. It was chaos. If it was Calloway's wallet it makes just as much sense at least to me. I suspect there was at least one cop and an assistant District Attorney on scene who wanted chaos, the more the better.
_________________
I'm just a patsy!

Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Sat 20 Jul 2019, 9:56 am
BC_II wrote:This is a fascinating, mature and respectful debate here. Thanks to you all for being critical in your thinking and analysis. Really helps when it should be a standard anyway when investing in this complex case. Greg, would you say that Tippit was involved in the conspiracy from a planning perspective? So, if I am to understand you correctly, you don't believe he was murdered as part of the planning but that may have happened due to a 'hiccup' or unforseen circumstance? I will definitely through this entire topic a few more times to get a better grasp on you guys' thinking and positions of course.
Neither Goban nor Redfern are trolls. They are both intelligent guys who just happen to have a different opinion on this issue.
As I see it it was unforeseen circumstance, Brent.
The back-story.
Have gathered quite a bit of circumstantial evidence suggesting that Wealthy Oldsmobile dealer WO Bankston was the middle man between a criminal gang in the area and fences for the stolen goods. At some point, Decker helped former Barrow gang member Floyd Hamilton get a pardon from prison and got him a security job with Bankston. Bankston was very close to both Decker and Fritz and in fact had bankrolled Decker's run at the Sheriff's office. Hamilton's specialties were break and enters and stealing cars. I believe his real job with Bankston was to keep the young gang in line and teach them tricks of the trade. At least some of the gang were on parole or serving non-custodial time. In either case, any arrest for anything would see them land in jail. The local patrolman, as well as Decker and Fritz would have all been getting kickbacks from Bankston
Now view Tipit's murder with that background in mind. Oak Cliff is drained of cops because of the assassination. Tippit is sent to cover the area. He responds to a disturbance call and starts scouting the area looking for the offenders. He sees a young man and stops him. He does not recognize Tippit and Tippit looks like he is going to arrest him. The young guy knows he will go to jail if he is arrested and shoots Tippit saying "poor dumb cop".
Now look at what happened after that... Decker requests to see Fritz after Fritz leaves the TSBD. No one ever finds out the reason for the meeting. But could it have been to tell Frit his JFK suspect had to be pinned with the Tippit murder as well? There is no way that the cops went to the theater because of Tippit initially. Postal said she didn't even know about Tippit when she made her call to police. All she knew about was the assassination. And we have a cop yelling at Oswald "Kill the president will you!!!" After the fact, the cops tried to make out the arrest was strictly for Tippit and only later did they add JFK -- which is bullshit. It was the other way around. They could not afford a proper investigation of the Tippit killing because of the corruption behind it. Someone had to be take the fall - and quickly.
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
- Jake_Sykes
- Posts : 1015
Join date : 2016-08-15
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Sat 20 Jul 2019, 11:03 am
greg parker wrote:BC_II wrote:This is a fascinating, mature and respectful debate here. Thanks to you all for being critical in your thinking and analysis. Really helps when it should be a standard anyway when investing in this complex case. Greg, would you say that Tippit was involved in the conspiracy from a planning perspective? So, if I am to understand you correctly, you don't believe he was murdered as part of the planning but that may have happened due to a 'hiccup' or unforseen circumstance? I will definitely through this entire topic a few more times to get a better grasp on you guys' thinking and positions of course.
Neither Goban nor Redfern are trolls. They are both intelligent guys who just happen to have a different opinion on this issue.
As I see it it was unforeseen circumstance, Brent.
The back-story.
Have gathered quite a bit of circumstantial evidence suggesting that Wealthy Oldsmobile dealer WO Bankston was the middle man between a criminal gang in the area and fences for the stolen goods. At some point, Decker helped former Barrow gang member Floyd Hamilton get a pardon from prison and got him a security job with Bankston. Bankston was very close to both Decker and Fritz and in fact had bankrolled Decker's run at the Sheriff's office. Hamilton's specialties were break and enters and stealing cars. I believe his real job with Bankston was to keep the young gang in line and teach them tricks of the trade. At least some of the gang were on parole or serving non-custodial time. In either case, any arrest for anything would see them land in jail. The local patrolman, as well as Decker and Fritz would have all been getting kickbacks from Bankston
Now view Tipit's murder with that background in mind. Oak Cliff is drained of cops because of the assassination. Tippit is sent to cover the area. He responds to a disturbance call and starts scouting the area looking for the offenders. He sees a young man and stops him. He does not recognize Tippit and Tippit looks like he is going to arrest him. The young guy knows he will go to jail if he is arrested and shoots Tippit saying "poor dumb cop".
Now look at what happened after that... Decker requests to see Fritz after Fritz leaves the TSBD. No one ever finds out the reason for the meeting. But could it have been to tell Frit his JFK suspect had to be pinned with the Tippit murder as well? There is no way that the cops went to the theater because of Tippit initially. Postal said she didn't even know about Tippit when she made her call to police. All she knew about was the assassination. And we have a cop yelling at Oswald "Kill the president will you!!!" After the fact, the cops tried to make out the arrest was strictly for Tippit and only later did they add JFK -- which is bullshit. It was the other way around. They could not afford a proper investigation of the Tippit killing because of the corruption behind it. Someone had to be take the fall - and quickly.
This make so much more sense than anything, and I mean anything else out there.
_________________
Release clear scans. Reveal the truth about Prayer Man. Preserve the history of the assassination of JFK.
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Sat 20 Jul 2019, 12:47 pm
Mentzel said he went to lunch at 12:30 at Luby's Cafe, 430 W Jefferson and that he tried to phone in several times but never got through until 1:00. It was only then that he learned of the assassination. He then left his lunch and went back to work and was called to an accident call (car accident?). hen he let that, he heard about Tippit and joined into that search. Whilst none of that may be true, I can't see any reason to doubt it.While stories like Tippit-was-Badgeman are clearly fanciful, Joseph McBride was correct to focus on William Mentzel (91). This is one guy who was relatively ignored by researchers even although his actions seem highly suspicious (he was supposedly on a lunch-break throughout the period following the assassination in a restaurant two blocks from the Texas Theatre). The testimony from Kenneth Croy and Harry Olsen is so unconvincing it places them as key suspects in my book.
Croy is just another fall guy for theorists to latch onto. Take away a need to find conspiratorial aspects to his actions and - at least up until the Tippit killing, most of us have had days like he described. His actions at the Tippit scene were tempered by the fact that he was not officially on duty and nor as a reservist, could he act unilaterally.
Olsen is a different kettle of fish. Plenty of reasons to have him under suspicion - though none having anything to do with the Tippit murder.
Tippit was several miles from his patrol area and the reason given by Jackson for his presence in north-east Oak Cliff is not credible. Several officers were in or very close to this area. One – C T Walker (56) – actually reported he was on East Jefferson seconds before Jackson’s 12:45 instruction* to R C Nelson (87) and Tippit (78). Additionally, Jackson’s dialogue with Tippit seems very stilted (“You will be at large for any emergency that comes in”) and pays undue attention to what was ostensibly a mundane policing task.
Walker may have been in transit through that area to wherever he was supposed to be. And what reads as stilted may not sound stilted - big difference between voice recording and transcript. It also may be he was using correct police terminology. We also need to remember an assassination of a president had just taken place, so who knows what "emergency" may happen next, so... mundane on a normal day... potentially anything but on that day.
The house outside which Tippit was shot matches the address given by Jack Ruby for Joyce McDonald (Joy Dale) and correlates with “... the apartment house where he (Tippit) lives in...” part of Virginia Davis’s testimony. In other words, this encounter was unlikely to be random – I believe Tippit knew his killer.
It was Andrew Armstrong who gave her address -- though probably from Ruby's address book. According to Armstrong, she lived at 424 1/2 W Tenth, apartment 3.
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10405&relPageId=506
Tippit was killed outside 410 if I recall correctly so she would be about 7 houses from it.
As for the Davis comment... I don't think it's hard to imagine that if a cop gets shot down the road from you, you would assume it was the regular cop for that area. Do we know where Mentzel lived? Otherwise, she possibly just misspoke, or it was a mistranscription. W'll never know because Belin let the comment sail right be him.
White was so suspicious of the behavior of the driver that he took down the number plate... but then failed to call it in.Intriguing factors in the Tippit conundrum which have never really been explained are:
1) The Mather car at the El Chico restaurant with the Oswald lookalike.
2) Leona Miller giving the same phone number noted in the Carousel Club as that reported by the Davis sisters-in-law.
Long time since I've looked at the Leonie Miller thing, but I don't think it necessarily has to be connected to anything in particular.
The article from Jack Myers references the story about a “fight at Marsalis and 12th” which has now morphed into a “stabbing at Marsalis and 10th” of which there were “many witnesses” (although none has ever come forward). Such an event would seem like the ideal pretext to explain Tippit’s presence in the north-eastern section of Oak Cliff – a major dilemma facing DPD. We’d really need a lot more evidence to take this at face value.
The James Andrews story strikes me as being fictitious. It only emerged when a researcher approached him to ask about Roscoe White. Why would anyone sit on a something like this for years? The location where this incident was supposed to have occurred also conflicts with any reasonable timeline for Tippit’s last few minutes.
Lots of unbelievable stories arise from witnesses being approached by authors with agendas and preconceptions. Some are taken as Gospel anyhow.
I do not think that is where any disturbance happened.
This is from a 1967 interview with Murray Jackson

I think this a compressed version mixing some of the truth with some of the cover story.
The Davis sisters said in testimony that their phone call was to advise of a murder of a police officer. That in no way could be categorized as a "disturbance" call. He says he called Tippit to it but he never answered. But what if Tippit did answer? He goes to the site of the disturbance and gets shot. Did Jackson really try and call Tippit AFTER hearing a cop was down because he figured it had to be him? Maybe, but none of the witnesses said anything about hearing any calls coming in.
5 missed calls for Tippit is one every couple of years. Maybe he was due for one.I keep an open mind about the Top Ten Record Shop claim – it may be true, but why did we only hear about it nearly 20 years later? Then again, Tippit did miss a radio call around this time – unanswered calls were rare and according to the Bill Drenas article one of only 5 or so in his DPD career. Noticeably, Mentzel also missed a call shortly after finally returning from his lunch-break.
The two witnesses for the Tp 10 were store owner Dub Stark and sales assistant Louis Cortinas. They claimed that Tippit came rushing into the store and asked to use the phone – something they claimed he had done a few times in the past. He was in such a hurry that he pushed past customers. The call however, seemed to go unanswered as he let it ring 8 to 10 times before hanging up and rushing out. Cortinas stated he watched Tippit go to his car parked on Bishop Ave and run a stop sign turning onto Sunset.
In part 3 of Drena’s article on Tippi’s movements, he lists all the objections he had received concerned Tippit’s alleged stop at the Top 10. We will go through them here:
Cortinas could not have seen if Tippit’s squad car was parked on Bishop. Drenas found that this was true but that Cortinas surmised that it was parked on Bishop from watching the direction in which Tippit walked and the direction from in which his car came. My comment: Possible.
Cortinas could not have seen Tippit run a stop sign and turn onto Sunset from behind the counter. Drenas found this was possible by looking through the windows of cars that would otherwise block the view. My comment: Possible but may be stretching credulity.
Tippit had to have left the Top Ten more than 10 minutes before it was announced on the radio that a police officer was killed. Drenas gives this a free pass on the basis that time perception is extremely subjective and on the basis that ͞we will probably never know the exact time that Tippit left the Top Ten or the exact moment he was killed.͟
My comment: Drenas is correct about time perception. But he makes a logical error after that by assuming the thing under question (Tippit being in the Top Ten) is true in order to help cloud a timing issue tied to the very questioning of its truthfulness. It is also false that we cannot get close to accurate on the time that Tippit was shot. We have Helen Markham, an eyewitness who shows the murder happened prior to 1:06 because she was on her way to catch a bus due at around that time.
I think the call was made by the hapless Kenneth Croy. The Tippit murder had played havoc with his scheduled meeting with his estranged wife. I think he raced in and made the call trying to catch her at home before she left for the meeting but was too late. She already left.
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
- Vinny
- Posts : 3021
Join date : 2013-08-27
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Sat 20 Jul 2019, 7:09 pm
Sadly Callaway is dead. He died in 2005. I mistakenly thought that he was still alive.
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/85883831/ted-callaway
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/85883831/ted-callaway
_________________
Out With Bill Shelley In Front.
- Goban_Saor
- Posts : 454
Join date : 2013-07-16
Re: Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Sun 21 Jul 2019, 12:38 am
Greg,
My delayed response is due to a couple of excursions to other parts of the island, one of which involved, inter alia, pints of Guinness.
There’s a lot of food for thought in the contributions to the discussion which have been made by you and other members in the meantime which I have been trying to digest and will continue trying to digest.
In the meantime, I will try to reply to your last post addressed to me, and in doing so focus on probability theory.
The first sentence of your post is: ‘Goban, can you show any examples of a court accepting probability theory as evidence for the prosecution or defense?’
An article by Edward Gerjuoy, Professor of Physics , ‘The Relevance of Probability Theory to the Problem of Relevance’, is apposite.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/29761600?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
The opening couple of sentences shows the relevance of probability theory to judicial decision-making:
‘The phraseology of the law, the very language with which law students are inculcated, is liberally sprinkled with expressions explicitly or implicitly suggestive of probabilistic concepts. The probabilistic connotations of the common standards of proof – “beyond a reasonable doubt” (criminal cases) and “by a preponderance of the evidence” (civil cases) – are particularly evident.’
In a footnote to this sentence Professor Gerjuoy further states, ‘Indeed (as it hardly is necessary to point out) these standards of proof typically are defined in explicitly probabilistic terms…the preponderance of evidence becomes the trier’s belief in the preponderance of probability’.
Another article titled ‘The Laws of Probability and the Law of the Land’ by David Kaye, Professor of Law, Arizona State University, which refers to Gerjuoy’s article among many others, is also apposite, as evidenced by the following quote:
‘Few people would argue, for example, that there is some more accurate way to predict whether the first two cards dealt from a well shuffled deck will be red than to calculate the probability as (1/2) X (1/2) = 1/4. The same theory should be no less accurate for making "postdictions," or findings of fact. If we wish to decide whether two cards which have already been dealt face down are red, the most accurate basis for coming to a conclusion (without peeking) is to rely on the same probability calculation: (1/2) X (1/2) = 1/4.’
In a footnote (#21) to this passage Professor Kaye writes, “Courtroom decisions as to what has occurred are analogous to guessing what happened when the cards were dealt face down, and accuracy in making predictions thus translates into accuracy in factfinding.”
https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4187&context=uclrev
It’s clear from these extracts that my calculation of the odds relating to the likelihood of the JFK and Tippit murders being linked is precisely the same kind of calculation to which Professor Kaye alludes here as being central to courtroom decisions.
Probability arguments are not only admissible: they are fundamental to judicial decision making. Therefore, your main objection to my probability argument appears to be unsustainable.
Having established the admissibility of my mathematical calculation in the JFK case, there would seem to be a need to develop the calculation further to take account of factors which might affect its accuracy.
As I’ve suggested, the chances of the JFK and Tippit murders being unconnected are about 1/10,000 or less.* I described three possible scenarios in which they would be connected: Scenario 1 in which Tippit was shot by the JFK murder suspect resisting arrest; Scenario 2 in which there was a plot comprising both murders, with the Tippit murder made to look like that in Scenario 1; Scenario 3 in which Tippit was shot for reasons which had nothing to do with the JFK assassination, such as that of your Markham gang theory.
Since you reject the first two scenarios, I’ll focus on your Markham gang theory. As explained by Professor Kaye in his paper, Bayes’ theorem seems to be the method normally used by experts in calculating the extent to which an incident such as the Markham incident you postulate might affect the overall calculation.
Since I don’t know how to use Bayes’ theorem, and perhaps you don’t either, it might be best to refer the matter to an expert if we want to have as informed an understanding as possible of the ‘preponderance of probability’ in the Tippit murder case, to use Professor Gerjuoy’s phrase.
There’s an interesting website called Understanding Uncertainty run by the Statistical Laboratory in the University of Cambridge on which there’s a ‘Contact us’ option. In the interest of obtaining the best possible expert advice on the subject of our discussion and of maintaining the objective scientific standards to which ROKC aspires, it might be useful for ROKC to avail of this option.
(I might do it myself when I have time to summarise the issue, but I think it would be better if it were a ROKC initiative, not least because the circumstances which require me to post anonymously in ROKC still remain.)
https://understandinguncertainty.org/about
There’s an article on this website about a court case titled ‘Court of Appeal bans Bayesian probability (and Sherlock Holmes)’ followed by a discussion about probability theory and judicial decision making:
https://understandinguncertainty.org/court-appeal-bans-bayesian-probability-and-sherlock-holmes
In the 2013 case in question the English Court of Appeal denied that probability theory can be used in trying to determine the facts of a case.
As the author of the article, an academic who teaches applied probability theory in the University of Cambridge, and some of the commenters on the article, said, this is nonsensical. As everyone knows or should know, and as acknowledged in the articles by Professors Gerjuoy and Kaye cited above, probability theory is fundamental to judicial decision making. The Court of Appeals decision is therefore patently irrational and perverse.
To return to your Markham gang theory, it centres on the proposition that Officer Tippit’s murder was unconnected in its motivation to the JFK assassination, notwithstanding a possible tenuous connection which arose accidentally from Tippit’s deployment to Oak Cliff as a result of the assassination.
Since your theory implies that the JFK and Tippit murders are essentially unconnected, it also implies that the Tippit murder is in the same category, from a probability theory standpoint, as any other cop killing in Dallas back in those years. Hence, the probability of its occurrence is the same as that of those other cop killings, which I have estimated as 1/10,000 or less.*
It would appear to follow from this that the most rational working hypothesis upon which the JFK and Tippit murders should be examined would seem to be that they are connected.
*Redfern’s point that Tippit was only the third DPD officer to be killed by gunfire since the war would, according to my probability theory argument, increase the probability even further that there was a causal connection between the JFK and Tippit murders, since my calculation of 10,000/1 is based on a rate of one per year.
My delayed response is due to a couple of excursions to other parts of the island, one of which involved, inter alia, pints of Guinness.
There’s a lot of food for thought in the contributions to the discussion which have been made by you and other members in the meantime which I have been trying to digest and will continue trying to digest.
In the meantime, I will try to reply to your last post addressed to me, and in doing so focus on probability theory.
The first sentence of your post is: ‘Goban, can you show any examples of a court accepting probability theory as evidence for the prosecution or defense?’
An article by Edward Gerjuoy, Professor of Physics , ‘The Relevance of Probability Theory to the Problem of Relevance’, is apposite.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/29761600?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
The opening couple of sentences shows the relevance of probability theory to judicial decision-making:
‘The phraseology of the law, the very language with which law students are inculcated, is liberally sprinkled with expressions explicitly or implicitly suggestive of probabilistic concepts. The probabilistic connotations of the common standards of proof – “beyond a reasonable doubt” (criminal cases) and “by a preponderance of the evidence” (civil cases) – are particularly evident.’
In a footnote to this sentence Professor Gerjuoy further states, ‘Indeed (as it hardly is necessary to point out) these standards of proof typically are defined in explicitly probabilistic terms…the preponderance of evidence becomes the trier’s belief in the preponderance of probability’.
Another article titled ‘The Laws of Probability and the Law of the Land’ by David Kaye, Professor of Law, Arizona State University, which refers to Gerjuoy’s article among many others, is also apposite, as evidenced by the following quote:
‘Few people would argue, for example, that there is some more accurate way to predict whether the first two cards dealt from a well shuffled deck will be red than to calculate the probability as (1/2) X (1/2) = 1/4. The same theory should be no less accurate for making "postdictions," or findings of fact. If we wish to decide whether two cards which have already been dealt face down are red, the most accurate basis for coming to a conclusion (without peeking) is to rely on the same probability calculation: (1/2) X (1/2) = 1/4.’
In a footnote (#21) to this passage Professor Kaye writes, “Courtroom decisions as to what has occurred are analogous to guessing what happened when the cards were dealt face down, and accuracy in making predictions thus translates into accuracy in factfinding.”
https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4187&context=uclrev
It’s clear from these extracts that my calculation of the odds relating to the likelihood of the JFK and Tippit murders being linked is precisely the same kind of calculation to which Professor Kaye alludes here as being central to courtroom decisions.
Probability arguments are not only admissible: they are fundamental to judicial decision making. Therefore, your main objection to my probability argument appears to be unsustainable.
Having established the admissibility of my mathematical calculation in the JFK case, there would seem to be a need to develop the calculation further to take account of factors which might affect its accuracy.
As I’ve suggested, the chances of the JFK and Tippit murders being unconnected are about 1/10,000 or less.* I described three possible scenarios in which they would be connected: Scenario 1 in which Tippit was shot by the JFK murder suspect resisting arrest; Scenario 2 in which there was a plot comprising both murders, with the Tippit murder made to look like that in Scenario 1; Scenario 3 in which Tippit was shot for reasons which had nothing to do with the JFK assassination, such as that of your Markham gang theory.
Since you reject the first two scenarios, I’ll focus on your Markham gang theory. As explained by Professor Kaye in his paper, Bayes’ theorem seems to be the method normally used by experts in calculating the extent to which an incident such as the Markham incident you postulate might affect the overall calculation.
Since I don’t know how to use Bayes’ theorem, and perhaps you don’t either, it might be best to refer the matter to an expert if we want to have as informed an understanding as possible of the ‘preponderance of probability’ in the Tippit murder case, to use Professor Gerjuoy’s phrase.
There’s an interesting website called Understanding Uncertainty run by the Statistical Laboratory in the University of Cambridge on which there’s a ‘Contact us’ option. In the interest of obtaining the best possible expert advice on the subject of our discussion and of maintaining the objective scientific standards to which ROKC aspires, it might be useful for ROKC to avail of this option.
(I might do it myself when I have time to summarise the issue, but I think it would be better if it were a ROKC initiative, not least because the circumstances which require me to post anonymously in ROKC still remain.)
https://understandinguncertainty.org/about
There’s an article on this website about a court case titled ‘Court of Appeal bans Bayesian probability (and Sherlock Holmes)’ followed by a discussion about probability theory and judicial decision making:
https://understandinguncertainty.org/court-appeal-bans-bayesian-probability-and-sherlock-holmes
In the 2013 case in question the English Court of Appeal denied that probability theory can be used in trying to determine the facts of a case.
As the author of the article, an academic who teaches applied probability theory in the University of Cambridge, and some of the commenters on the article, said, this is nonsensical. As everyone knows or should know, and as acknowledged in the articles by Professors Gerjuoy and Kaye cited above, probability theory is fundamental to judicial decision making. The Court of Appeals decision is therefore patently irrational and perverse.
To return to your Markham gang theory, it centres on the proposition that Officer Tippit’s murder was unconnected in its motivation to the JFK assassination, notwithstanding a possible tenuous connection which arose accidentally from Tippit’s deployment to Oak Cliff as a result of the assassination.
Since your theory implies that the JFK and Tippit murders are essentially unconnected, it also implies that the Tippit murder is in the same category, from a probability theory standpoint, as any other cop killing in Dallas back in those years. Hence, the probability of its occurrence is the same as that of those other cop killings, which I have estimated as 1/10,000 or less.*
It would appear to follow from this that the most rational working hypothesis upon which the JFK and Tippit murders should be examined would seem to be that they are connected.
*Redfern’s point that Tippit was only the third DPD officer to be killed by gunfire since the war would, according to my probability theory argument, increase the probability even further that there was a causal connection between the JFK and Tippit murders, since my calculation of 10,000/1 is based on a rate of one per year.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|