Choose Search Type
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Nick McDonald
Today at 9:57 am by Mick Purdy

» JFK Links
Today at 9:38 am by Mick Purdy

» The 488 Military Intelligence Detachment (for Steve T)
Today at 8:12 am by greg parker

» Bill and Gayle Newman Lancer Conf. 2016
Today at 4:17 am by barto

» My 2015 ROKC presentation
Yesterday at 5:38 pm by Ed. Ledoux

» A Shameful Legacy
Yesterday at 4:59 pm by Ed. Ledoux

» Prayer Man Vs Sasquatch
Yesterday at 4:42 pm by Ed. Ledoux

» Harold Pollard intro to ROKC conference 2015
Yesterday at 3:52 pm by Ed. Ledoux

» He works for us!
Yesterday at 12:08 pm by steely dan

Log in

I forgot my password

Social bookmarking

Social bookmarking Digg  Social bookmarking Delicious  Social bookmarking Reddit  Social bookmarking Stumbleupon  Social bookmarking Slashdot  Social bookmarking Yahoo  Social bookmarking Google  Social bookmarking Blinklist  Social bookmarking Blogmarks  Social bookmarking Technorati  

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

RSS feeds


Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 


Affiliates
free forum
 



The lone malcontent Gunman with no associates

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The lone malcontent Gunman with no associates

Post by Mick Purdy on Mon 05 Aug 2013, 6:29 pm

Ok, so explain to me like I'm a four year old. Why, if the Warren commission was right about whom LHO was, and whom they believed committed the crime, would the authorities in the name of national security classify documents connected with this case, "postponed in full" 'top secret" "never to be seen" or filed away, under Tax disclosure legislation. Just a thought

Mick Purdy

Posts : 175
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The lone malcontent Gunman with no associates

Post by greg parker on Mon 05 Aug 2013, 7:14 pm

Mick,

I'm not sure how many files have been postponed regarding for instance, Mexico City, but to play Devil's Advocate, even an innocent CIA might still ask for them to be exempted from FOIA to protect sources, methods etc. There were many many operations happening in Mexico. 

Is this a legitimate excuse? I don't know. All that matters is that it works. 

On the face of it, it is ridiculous for the reasons you state.

_________________
Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
-----------------------------
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me

greg parker
Admin

Posts : 3743
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 58
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum