- James DiEugenio
- Posts : 213
Join date : 2013-08-01
CTKA review of Survivor's Guilt
Fri 11 Apr 2014, 10:58 am
http://www.ctka.net/2014_reviews/survivors_guilt.html
The first half is a valuable contribution to the literature, because no one has done the work he has on this subject. No one is even close.
The second half tapers off considerably.
I mean does anyone edit these books anymore?
But the first 220 pages I think are quite good.
Vince makes a cogent argument that something besides happenstance or negligence was at work here. And that Rowley was part of the cover up.
The first half is a valuable contribution to the literature, because no one has done the work he has on this subject. No one is even close.
The second half tapers off considerably.
I mean does anyone edit these books anymore?
But the first 220 pages I think are quite good.
Vince makes a cogent argument that something besides happenstance or negligence was at work here. And that Rowley was part of the cover up.
Re: CTKA review of Survivor's Guilt
Fri 11 Apr 2014, 11:34 am
James DiEugenio wrote:http://www.ctka.net/2014_reviews/survivors_guilt.html
The first half is a valuable contribution to the literature, because no one has done the work he has on this subject. No one is even close.
The second half tapers off considerably.
I mean does anyone edit these books anymore?
But the first 220 pages I think are quite good.
Vince makes a cogent argument that something besides happenstance or negligence was at work here. And that Rowley was part of the cover up.
James,
I enjoyed your review tremendously and it was about the same way I felt about the volume.
But did you happen to understand where he was going with the "test" or "practice drill" on 11/22/63?
- James DiEugenio
- Posts : 213
Join date : 2013-08-01
Re: CTKA review of Survivor's Guilt
Fri 11 Apr 2014, 11:47 am
Not really, which is why I didn't mention it.
I didn't think VInce clarified that issue very well in either its provenance or its significance.
I didn't think VInce clarified that issue very well in either its provenance or its significance.
- AllenLowe
- Posts : 84
Join date : 2011-12-15
Re: CTKA review of Survivor's Guilt
Sat 12 Apr 2014, 1:50 am
I agree, too, Jim, with your review. Fascinating research, no editing; very repetitive as well.
Re: CTKA review of Survivor's Guilt
Sat 12 Apr 2014, 8:36 am
Great review, Jim. Well done!
- James DiEugenio
- Posts : 213
Join date : 2013-08-01
Re: CTKA review of Survivor's Guilt
Sat 12 Apr 2014, 9:45 am
Thanks to all of you.
I think its a valuable book.
I think its a valuable book.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|