Embittered Simkin exiles don't like me

David Reitzes wrote:Certain former members of the Simkin forum (some who were kicked out and 
some who apparently left voluntarily) have been having online conniptions 
that I'm allowed to post there without fear of repercussions: 

https://reopenkennedycase.forumotion.net/t406-the-ed-forum-and-deep-politics-forum 

https://reopenkennedycase.forumotion.net/t492-summers-reitzes-and-myers-what-a-triangle 

The forum is run by Greg Parker, who used to post here under the name 
"Magic Bullet." His great contribution to the JFK discourse would have to 
be his acclaimed scholarship in linking Jack Ruby to CIA mind-control 
plots. Despite his persistent, frothing hostility towards me, I once 
offered him a friendly invitation to visit a (now-defunct) Bob Dylan fan 
site of mine. He responded by suggesting that I wanted Dylan dead, along 
with all the rest of the great liberal icons. (I would speculate that no 
one might be more surprised than Dylan himself to hear that he's still a 
liberal icon, but I'm glad he's still around either way. [emphasis mine] I've seen him 
perform live a couple of times, and on neither occasion did I attempt to 
assassinate him.) 

Dave 

Glenn V wrote:Greg Parker and his buddy Lee Farley, two die-hard CTs with a temper and a 
really bad attitude. When I used to post on the EF, both of them did their 
very best to bully me out of there. Farley even send me some really nasty 
insults as personal messages. 

"You're a pest and an idiot" and such. So yes, I couldn't say that their 
bullying was entirely in vain, as this definately had something to do with 
me leaving that forum. 

bpete in reply to the first post by Reitzes wrote:You're beginning to sound like Cinque , more so with each passing day. 

Dave "The Lyin' Sack O'Shit" Reitzes claims I accused him of wanting Bob Dylan dead, along with every other liberal icon.

Please note Dave hasn't provided a link to verify his claim... so here it is...from back in July of 2000

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Embittered$20Simkin$20exiles$20don$27t$20like$20me/alt.assassination.jfk/JD75HNcuE9I/vcv2ET8CjP4J

Greg Parker wrote:"How'm I supposed to get any ridin' done? Hmm."
             Bob Dylan
 
There are currently 37 threads of an anti-Garrison nature.

OTOH, only 7 that could be described as pro...

And they call US buffs?

Dave Reitzes wrote:What's an "anti-Garrison" thread? I see a number of posts criticizing Garrison.
I see very few attacking him personally, and no such attacks in any subject
header.


(quote) - - - - - -
"Buff" is a derogatory term for John F. Kennedy assassination researcher or
conspiracy theorist. Such a term is wielded to keep a particular sector of the
community "in its place."
(end quote) - - - - -

From my article, "Garrison Ripples."
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ripples.htm
It's a vulgar term. I only know four people who use it: Ray La Fontaine, Mary
La Fontaine, Robert Harris, and John McAdams. Who precisely did you mean by
"they"?
Dave

P.S. If you're a Dylan fan, check out my Web site.

Dave:
What's an "anti-Garrison" thread? I see a number of posts criticizing
Garrison.
I see very few attacking him personally, and no such attacks in any
subject
header.

Greg:
Short-hand for any thread title that looked like a personal attack, an
attempt at debunking his theories, or about the broader aspects of the NO
investigation.
Dave:
Sounds a little broad. Why shouldn't people criticize Garrison's
investigation? Wouldn't an honest investigation benefit from honest
criticism?

It's ["buff']a vulgar term. I only know four people who use it: Ray La Fontaine, Mary
La Fontaine, Robert Harris, and John McAdams. Who precisely did you mean by
"they"?

Greg:
You know. The "they" that's not "we".

Dave:
Sounds a bit iffy. You're sure that people are calling you this?

Dave:
P.S. If you're a Dylan fan, check out my Web site.

Greg:
Why? Do you do a hatchet job on him as well? The Feebies hounded Phil Ochs
to death. But it must be galling that some of those '60's types survived,
huh?

Dave:
Why would I post rare recordings of Dylan's music if I didn't like him?

Is Glenn Viklund still crying into his pickled herrings?

FFS.

He really needs to change therapists because the one he has is obviously not helping him.

He's like the Oswald-did-it version of Peter Lemkin.

Dave Reitzes to Glenn V wrote:Yeah, they seem to have some kind of grudge against both of us: 

DVP chimes in wrote:Neither one of them (Farley, Parker) likes me very much either. (I'm so 

hurt too.) :-) 

Big Dog (in reply to Reitzes saying he attended Dylan concerts wrote:What happened, Dave? Coulcn't you get a clear shot at him?  

Glenn V trying to sell us drugs wrote:They [Farley & parker] will surely need strengthening energizers like that since they're 
gone be running around in circles for the next thirty years. 

Robert Harris wrote:David, the allegation against you was, 

"Dave Reitzes is posting as his usual troll self.  Two threads. 
Comparing critics of the WC with those who believe in paranormal activity." 

Is that true? 

If so, then you need to realize that when you post ad hominem attacks, 
you will get replies in kind. 

In that forum, you don't have mcadams to protect you from your 
adversaries while you post all kinds of insults and repeatedly call them 
liars. 

But hey! Maybe you can talk some of those guys into posting here! You 
can kick some serious butt if they go for it:-) 

\"Bud" replying to RH wrote:Some have ventured here, and yes, they did get their butts kicked. 

\"BT George" has a crack... wrote:So if they could insult him more freely and call him a liar, that would 
disprove his arguments?  Do you accept that when others do that to you, 
that your ideas are falsified thereby?  Clearly not, and I wouldn't expect 
you to. 


Likewise, if Dave was posting---as he was here until recently---comparing 
those who reject (macro) evolution to believers in conspiracy, should I 
consider that Ad Hominem or simply reject the characterization based on my 
belief that the evidence for Darwinism is less conclusive than that 
against Oswald? 


I know that you have 180 degrees different opinion on that, but all that 
shows is 3 different views of the same set of propositions.  That's why we 
have debates and debate forums.  To me Ad Hominem is more about demonizing 
a PERSON than comparing their ideas unfavorably. 

Reitzes replying to his missed opportunity at snuffing Dylan... wrote:Umbrella gun misfired. 

Apparently, it's bad luck to open an umbrella gun indoors. 

\"Curt Jester" replies to Dave's original post wrote:Hey, I had Greg booted from out CT forum!  As a CT'er he was undermining 
the whole concept of the group.  So maybe he's a wolf in sheep's clothing. 
Did anyone ever think Mr. Reitzes was likeable???...  Enquiring Minds 
Wanna Know! 

Here is the CT forum "Curt" got me kicked out of. 
 https://www.facebook.com/groups/212288358867993/

It has now become a closed group so only members can see the posts.

More cultish behavior. They couldn't bear that I was picking all the bullshit to pieces, even after I was booted, so they have simply dived for cover.

(Note that any ragging out of the group is aimed at the administrators, and a few small-minded members only)

I take being called a bitter , paranoid ,egotistical, troublemaking  feminazi control freak who can not keep a man and just needs to get laid as a sign that I am doing something right.  I somehow keep managing to get thrown out of all these groups only to be asked to come back by their creators. Not really sure how that happens. 
It might have something to do with the fact that I post in public that I will post all emails and private messages in the open and I will post screenshots of thread discussions as well so that bullshit can not hide behind "closed" groups that claim they are for educational use.
I do not allow comments on the walls of my database, I do allow comments and members to join the research portal and they are permitted to exchange views there but NOT disinformation or any strange idea they pull out of their behinds that morning and I will not allow it to become a playground for the likes of McAdams and Von Pein.
Because I have designated rules for the use of my database as it builds I have been called propaganda BEFORE it is even built or open for public use.
I discovered this years ago on Myspace as well when I started a page called Mae's garden to store the work of Mae Brussell.
Before that page was even open to ANY public view I had messages asking me what it was.  There is certain information that is more dangerous than other information

Name calling and flaming to distract these threads has occurred online for the past 20 years 
So be it.
They have not discovered the distraction that will deter me , Because there isn't one.

I'm on both forums. Based on my time spent at each, and my review at my website, this forum provides a free environment where only rare and reasonable moderation occurs. (I have never seen it, but I assume someone has been possibly) McAdams web group unfortunately allows the likes of DVP, Big Dog (that name speaks volumes), and Curt Jester to make personal attacks based on little information and less evidence. I have reviewed DVP's claims, ironically my next review is on a piece by Reitzes.