Choose Search Type
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Larry Buchanan, Naughty Dallas, Jada and Jack Ruby
Yesterday at 7:54 pm by greg parker

» Ann Goodpasture HSCA
Yesterday at 12:16 pm by steely dan

» ROKC Art Gallery
Yesterday at 5:53 am by steely dan

» Charles Givens Arrests
Sat 16 Dec 2017, 10:33 pm by Colin Crow

»  Oswald's CIA 201 File
Fri 15 Dec 2017, 3:52 am by Steve Thomas

» Willing To Make Some Phone Calls Here in The States
Fri 15 Dec 2017, 1:43 am by Terry W. Martin

» More Greg Bashing From Hargrove
Tue 12 Dec 2017, 8:46 pm by Paul Francisco Paso

» the Ed Forum and the shutting down of threads
Tue 12 Dec 2017, 12:05 pm by Terry W. Martin

» More Garbage
Tue 12 Dec 2017, 11:30 am by Terry W. Martin

Log in

I forgot my password

Social bookmarking

Social bookmarking digg  Social bookmarking delicious  Social bookmarking reddit  Social bookmarking stumbleupon  Social bookmarking slashdot  Social bookmarking yahoo  Social bookmarking google  Social bookmarking blogmarks  Social bookmarking live      

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

RSS feeds


Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 


Affiliates
free forum
 



the ignorati

View previous topic View next topic Go down

the ignorati

Post by greg parker on Sun 11 Jun 2017, 11:05 pm

Sandy Larsen certainly provides a lot of opportunities to highlight stupidity on jfk forums.

Here is his latest own gaol.



SL wrote:(claim one) Armstrong presents a lot of evidence for his theory that apparently cannot be disputed (at least not credibly so). Parnell doesn't. So there is no calling the kettle black.


(claim two) I follow the evidence. I don't give a whit about the inclinations of the ignorati. (That is, people who refuse to consider that the U.S. government might assassinate leaders of other countries; that the CIA might be partially funded by illicit drug trade; that the CIA might secretly experiment on it citizens with dangerous drugs; that the CIA might have a doppelganger program involving youths.)


(claim three) That doesn't mean that Armstrong is right about everything. For example, I see no reason for him to believe that the Oswald impersonator running around Dallas was the same person as the young LEE Oswald.
Claims One and two: Parnell, myself and numerous others have indeed successfully rebutted many of Armstrong's claims - more than enough in fact, to leave the theory in tatters.  That you don't like the rebuttals is just a symptom of your broken outlook and logic as shown in your next claim....

that people who refuse to consider that the US government might assassinate leaders of other countries, that the CIA might be partially funded by illicit drug trade, that the CIA might secretly experiment on its citizens with dangerous drugs, that the CIA might have a doppelganger program involving youths

Clearly, your "not credible" claim against Tracy is predicted by your "don't give a whit" attitude to those with whom you disagree. 

I also find it fascinating that in each of your cherished beliefs, you have actually used qualifying terms in the descriptions - despite three of the four claims being provably true. 

What's the odd one out again? Oh, yes... the doppelganger claim. While government documents show consideration of assassination, drug-running to fund operations and illegal medical experiments, there is not a single government document that even hints at the remote possibility of a doppelganger program.

The level of logic displayed by Larsen is only matched by his lack of insight in labeling others as members of the ignorati... 

I think that club meets every morning in Larsen's bathroom mirror.

Claim three: An Oswald impersonator running around Dallas is not proven, so it does not matter what you believe about it. If you actually did follow the evidence, you would know that.

_________________
Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
-----------------------------
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me

“God favors drunks, small children, and the cataclysmically stoned...” Steve King
"The worst thing about some men is that when they are not drunk they are sober." Billy Yeats
"You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on." Dino Martin



https://www.thenewdisease.space
avatar
greg parker
Admin

Posts : 4597
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 59
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum