Choose Search Type
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Lillian Murret & the Dentist
Yesterday at 9:34 pm by greg parker

» why look at simple explanations?
Thu 19 Oct 2017, 8:49 am by greg parker

» Update to Anatomy Of The Second Floor Lunch Room Encounter
Wed 18 Oct 2017, 10:10 pm by Vinny

» US knew about 1960s mass killings of communists in Indonesia, declassified documents reveal
Wed 18 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm by barto

» CTKA's Review of Absolute Proof
Wed 18 Oct 2017, 5:33 pm by Stan Dane

» Oswald Seeks a Permit
Wed 18 Oct 2017, 12:40 pm by Ed. Ledoux

» Harvey and Lee Cult - The Interview
Wed 18 Oct 2017, 10:28 am by Stan Dane

» Oswald Autopsy Articles
Tue 17 Oct 2017, 11:27 pm by Vinny

» Another axe falls on the H & L Cult
Tue 17 Oct 2017, 2:30 pm by BC_II

Log in

I forgot my password

Social bookmarking

Social bookmarking Digg  Social bookmarking Delicious  Social bookmarking Reddit  Social bookmarking Stumbleupon  Social bookmarking Slashdot  Social bookmarking Yahoo  Social bookmarking Google  Social bookmarking Blinklist  Social bookmarking Blogmarks  Social bookmarking Technorati  

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

RSS feeds


Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 


Affiliates
free forum
 



How The 3 Shots Sounded In Dealey Plaza

View previous topic View next topic Go down

How The 3 Shots Sounded In Dealey Plaza

Post by psellers on Sat 18 Dec 2010, 6:45 pm

From Live Recordings’ of the Shots in Dealey Plaza:
Reliability of Ear-Witness Evidence in the JFK Assassination
by Andrew M. Mason
http://www.dufourlaw.com/JFK/shot_pattern_excerpt.PDF

Conclusions about the shot pattern

As seen from the above review of the evidence, there are at least 44 witnesses who
recalled a relatively long pause after the first shot and a much shorter separation between the last two. Only 6 thought the pattern was the reverse. Another 10 may have thought the shots were fairly equally spaced.
If one assumes that the likelihood of a witness recalling a simple pattern of three loud
noises correctly was at least as great the likelihood of recalling it incorrectly, there is only one rational conclusion to be drawn from this evidence: the last two shots were closer together than the first two. If the shot pattern was 1…2…….3 one would have to explain how it could be possible that only 6 out of 60 witnesses perceived the pattern correctly.
One would have to explain not only why the rest of the witnesses were mistaken, but why 44 of them randomly made the same mistake.



Only 6 of the 60 sort of agreed with the official shot pattern? 44 agreed on an exact same pattern that differed considerably from the official one. Why were not all the ear-witnesses asked to give an account? Your thoughts would be most welcomed.

psellers

Posts : 15
Join date : 2010-12-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: How The 3 Shots Sounded In Dealey Plaza

Post by greg parker on Mon 20 Dec 2010, 9:23 pm

psellers wrote:From Live Recordings’ of the Shots in Dealey Plaza:
Reliability of Ear-Witness Evidence in the JFK Assassination
by Andrew M. Mason
http://www.dufourlaw.com/JFK/shot_pattern_excerpt.PDF

Conclusions about the shot pattern

As seen from the above review of the evidence, there are at least 44 witnesses who
recalled a relatively long pause after the first shot and a much shorter separation between the last two. Only 6 thought the pattern was the reverse. Another 10 may have thought the shots were fairly equally spaced.
If one assumes that the likelihood of a witness recalling a simple pattern of three loud
noises correctly was at least as great the likelihood of recalling it incorrectly, there is only one rational conclusion to be drawn from this evidence: the last two shots were closer together than the first two. If the shot pattern was 1…2…….3 one would have to explain how it could be possible that only 6 out of 60 witnesses perceived the pattern correctly.
One would have to explain not only why the rest of the witnesses were mistaken, but why 44 of them randomly made the same mistake.



Only 6 of the 60 sort of agreed with the official shot pattern? 44 agreed on an exact same pattern that differed considerably from the official one. Why were not all the ear-witnesses asked to give an account? Your thoughts would be most welcomed.

Here's some light reading for you...physics forum debate
avatar
greg parker
Admin

Posts : 4352
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 59
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum