the ignorati

Sandy Larsen certainly provides a lot of opportunities to highlight stupidity on jfk forums.

Here is his latest own gaol.

SL wrote:(claim one) Armstrong presents a lot of evidence for his theory that apparently cannot be disputed (at least not credibly so). Parnell doesn't. So there is no calling the kettle black.


(claim two) I follow the evidence. I don't give a whit about the inclinations of the ignorati. (That is, people who refuse to consider that the U.S. government might assassinate leaders of other countries; that the CIA might be partially funded by illicit drug trade; that the CIA might secretly experiment on it citizens with dangerous drugs; that the CIA might have a doppelganger program involving youths.)


(claim three) That doesn't mean that Armstrong is right about everything. For example, I see no reason for him to believe that the Oswald impersonator running around Dallas was the same person as the young LEE Oswald.

Claims One and two: Parnell, myself and numerous others have indeed successfully rebutted many of Armstrong's claims - more than enough in fact, to leave the theory in tatters.  That you don't like the rebuttals is just a symptom of your broken outlook and logic as shown in your next claim....

that people who refuse to consider that the US government might assassinate leaders of other countries, that the CIA might be partially funded by illicit drug trade, that the CIA might secretly experiment on its citizens with dangerous drugs, that the CIA might have a doppelganger program involving youths

Clearly, your "not credible" claim against Tracy is predicted by your "don't give a whit" attitude to those with whom you disagree. 

I also find it fascinating that in each of your cherished beliefs, you have actually used qualifying terms in the descriptions - despite three of the four claims being provably true. 

What's the odd one out again? Oh, yes... the doppelganger claim. While government documents show consideration of assassination, drug-running to fund operations and illegal medical experiments, there is not a single government document that even hints at the remote possibility of a doppelganger program.

The level of logic displayed by Larsen is only matched by his lack of insight in labeling others as members of the ignorati... 

I think that club meets every morning in Larsen's bathroom mirror.

Claim three: An Oswald impersonator running around Dallas is not proven, so it does not matter what you believe about it. If you actually did follow the evidence, you would know that.