For New Readers of This Forum

[JFK_Case]

First topic message reminder :

Putting this up for newbies to this forum. Some really nice stuff that will cast doubt on the "Oswald Did It" verdict.

Even today, you can read write-ups in the news about how Oswald was deranged, was a Communist (their favorite word to cast doubt on people; has been going on for years now and not just for Oswald) and other BS. So here's the deranged assassin in the hallway after he was arrested. The media loved to use this photo because it makes him look proud of what he had just done. It's simply a matter of him showing his handcuffs.

But take a look at the caption in the photo. Sure, sure:

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vrjkIg11WMc/YAnVwJz2ZOI/AAAAAAAAFrQ/GNPvFug_xSYTqvInNxGXa6S3aCn7xVOYwCLcBGAsYHQ/s800/LHO-WEARING-RING.png

***

A comparison photo of a guy who tried to re-create the Oswald backyard photo. But here's where it gets funny. Without this photo of him, there's no real hard evidence that he pulled the trigger with the rifle to kill Kennedy, nor the pistol that killed Tippit. so what do they do? They go all out with these fake photos - the rifle AND the pistol AND the Commie newspapers. HAHA. This has always led me to believe that he was supposed to be murdered in the theater with the pistol in his possession [because someone told him to bring it] to shut him up and the throwdown bullets and rifle at his place of work would have been nicely tied back to this photo too. And guess what? He admitted while he was held in custody the photos were fake.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IfF-FnnM958/Xz_-Z0EjxPI/AAAAAAAAFmA/8LkuGhIffFEM0ounEYrUkjZdYd-eLQdpgCLcBGAsYHQ/s640/LHO-CAPPEL-PHOTOS.gif

***

One of my favorites. From the minute they started the WC, they knew they had a problem with the shot trajectory. The back wound [which our former President Ford changed in the report to "neck" to further jive with the report - tell me...does ANYONE reading this think that sticker on the guy's right shoulder is a neck wound?] terminated in the back; in other words it didn't exit. The front throat wound also did not terminate. So during the reenactment they put a sticker on the back of the neck. There is absolutely no photographic evidence of the autopsy showing a wound on the back of the neck where the sticker is. So why did they do that? Because they wanted to see where a shot from the rear neck would hit and therefore come out the throat. Only it didn't. HAHA.

And that, dear readers, is the quandary they were in because if the shoulder shot did not exit anywhere and the front throat shot didn't either, we have a big problem that only magic could solve. And that's how the BS Single Bullet Theory came to be birthed and continues to be how it all went down.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HB1iPBCsDgI/Xd1Uxg_e6EI/AAAAAAAAFdg/eB3aG9ckbQcdoVnMZxY2O8RNsZPsg8oUwCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/fbi-and-autopsy.jpg

[barto]

Title: For New Readers of this forum
My reply; Run

A sarcastic reply for anyone new not to bother.
You missed that part apparently, I mean it was not even aimed at you.

And if you do not understand the documentation then perhaps I suggest you regain your focus on the subject matter. Those records are plastered in there for a reason.

I am keeping it tidy this time. Life's too short anyway.

[greg_parkerAdmin]

That can't be the envelope. It says it is a photo of items from 11/22.

[Ed.Ledoux]

But they have Search Warrant 11/23 for items taken from Beckley the 22nd?

Neither make sense as they took nothing from Beckley on 11/23.

Is there a separate photo of 11/23 search Warrant items from Irving then...?
Or are the placards meaningless

[JFK_FNG]

That can't be the envelope. It says it is a photo of items from 11/22.

This is the document I was referring to in my last comment, i.e. the only way the black envelope in the photo is the BYPs, assuming the label is correct that the items were taken on the 22nd, is if this guy was actually right. I haven't seen any other evidence calling into question the 'discovery' by McCabe though, so O'Leary's memory was probably just fuzzy three months later:

[Ed.Ledoux]

Right Tom.

The Dallas Cops are not honest about what they took and when.

(EVERYONE PLEASE STOP RELYING ON THEM TO BE HONEST. UNLESS UNDER OATH* !) *Warren Commission doesn't count*

The pair of binoculars are a classic example of switching items from one pile to the other.
I have zero faith they took photos of the items as dated by the placards. No way.
They didn't exactly hold up Friday's Dallas newspaper to date the Friday items or Saturdays newspaper to date the Saturdays items.
Although the Friday paper could still be used on Saturday it limits the Saturdays editions use.
You get the idea.

[Sponsored content]