Mark Lane Question

First topic message reminder :

Is he a disinformation mole?

Discuss...

JFK Student wrote:Hi Lee

 Could you post the information on Lane that you mentioned.It sounds quite interesting.

No.  Sorry.  I'm busy with other things right now.   Cannot be arsed with a pie throwing contest either.  There are too many people out there whose minds are hermetically sealed concerning this man.  It doesn't matter what I write someone is going to take offence.

Once I read Richard's comments about Lane becoming a very "spiritual" man that was the icing on the cake for me.  I thought " thank Christ for that."  When you've been part of something that saw almost 1000 people lose their lives, while you were stuffing you briefcase with money, one certainly has some penance and inner reflection to go through.  I like the idea of a "spiritual" lawyer.  Makes me feel all fuzzy inside.

I'd recommend you look into Mae Brussell's comments about Mark Lane and look at what William Turner and Warren Hinckle said about him.  They'll kind of sum up my feelings quite well.

greg parker wrote:

Dan wrote:But I assume you're aware that originally it was supposed to be Danny Joe Hawkins accompanying Tarrants on the bombing mission

I tried to phone Danny earlier this year. Unfortunately his wife answered. She told me he was out, and that it wouldn't do any good to ring back because he would never speak to me - or anyone.

It's nice when people can get on with their lives.

Some interesting things to consider here. I was previously unaware of the depth of Lane's involvement with the Jonestown incident.

What are we to make of the announcement that Lane has seemingly joined forces with Cinque and the O.I.C?

Good one, Greg, but haven't you heard ?  It was 'Oswald in the bathroom' after all.  Oh, Lordy.

Just an FYI. I saw a post of Mark Lane on Facebook from Ralph Cinque that stated Mr Lane as joined the Oswald Innocence Campaign .
When I stated my dismay Sue Hendron contacted me asking why I was upset and what the OIC is. She stated that she would pass my misgivings on to Mr Lane and that he doesn't interest himself with the minutiae.
I have the feeling though that Mr Lane knows exactly what the OIC is and has decided to back it.

The "Emperor Jones" sez' so, clothes or no.  Say it ain't so.

Lee Farley wrote:

JFK Student wrote:Hi Lee

 Could you post the information on Lane that you mentioned.It sounds quite interesting.

No.  Sorry.  I'm busy with other things right now.   Cannot be arsed with a pie throwing contest either.  There are too many people out there whose minds are hermetically sealed concerning this man.  It doesn't matter what I write someone is going to take offence.

Once I read Richard's comments about Lane becoming a very "spiritual" man that was the icing on the cake for me.  I thought " thank Christ for that."  When you've been part of something that saw almost 1000 people lose their lives, while you were stuffing you briefcase with money, one certainly has some penance and inner reflection to go through.  I like the idea of a "spiritual" lawyer.  Makes me feel all fuzzy inside.

I'd recommend you look into Mae Brussell's comments about Mark Lane and look at what William Turner and Warren Hinckle said about him.  They'll kind of sum up my feelings quite well.

All right,Lee.Will look up those sources.

OIC site lists these as senior members.

How disappointing.

And please do not forget Mr. McKnight, hovering above the 'wanted' poster at the website of the OIC, a 'secret member' as Dr. Ralph Cinque, PhD attests.

I can't believe Salandria's membership is true.  And I'm skeptical that Lane's is.

And, I may be mistaken, but the photograph under "James Norwood" looks suspiciously like Walt Brown.

Interesting article about Lane.

This guy seems to have been too deeply involved in Jonestown.

Evaluation Of Mark Lane Proposal


http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=13909