ROKC IS NOW CLOSED AND IS READ ONLY. WE THANK THOSE WHO HAVE SUPPORTED US OVER THE LAST 14 YEARS.


Search
Display results as :
Advanced Search
Latest topics
Brian says...Sat 30 Dec 2023, 4:33 pmEd.Ledoux
last drinks before the bar closesSat 30 Dec 2023, 2:46 pmTony Krome
The Mystery of Dirk Thomas KunertSat 30 Dec 2023, 1:23 pmTony Krome
Vickie AdamsSat 30 Dec 2023, 1:14 pmgreg_parker
Busted again: Tex ItaliaSat 30 Dec 2023, 9:22 amEd.Ledoux
The Raleigh CallSat 30 Dec 2023, 4:33 ambarto
Was Oswald ever confronted with the physical rifle?Sat 30 Dec 2023, 12:03 amCastroSimp
Who Dat? Fri 29 Dec 2023, 10:24 pmTony Krome
Log in
Social bookmarking
Social bookmarking reddit      

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website
Like/Tweet/+1

Search found 2 matches for toostupidtorealisetheyrestupid

by greg_parker
on Thu 04 Aug 2022, 10:51 pm
 
Search in: JFK
Topic: Proof that Pat Speer has no interest in the facts
Replies: 78
Views: 3402

Proof that Pat Speer has no interest in the facts

alex_wilson wrote:Ive  spent the last couple of hours  looking at all the available images of Prayerman I could find. 

Granted,  what I'm about to say is purely a personal opinion,  and utterly unscientific. 

But ,I  was thinking there's a very simple way to disprove the whole Prayerwoman  notion. 

If the image WAS of a female  then she must have been one helluva flat chested girl.

Sorry to be so crude folks,  but look at the images.  There's no sign of any cleavage. 
Honestly,  I don't know how anyone can come away from looking at those images thinking they were looking at a female. 

I know the image is blurred/ of relatively poor quality  etc( add all other appropriate disclaimers) but surely if the image was female,  especially when filmed at such an angle,  there would be some indication of " her" cleavage. 

I understand the various  " experts " ( our chum,  Pat Speer  et al) have had limited contact with  real life women ( plastic replicas do not count) but surely with Brian's  extensive experience with all manner of pornography the thought must have crossed his mind..

The absence of titties and the absence of evidence...or some such shit..

#toostupidtorealisetheyrestupid

Alex, how dare you Sir! How utterly dare you not see a 300 pound flat- chested female wearing a wig ala Irma Le Douce purely for professional reasons. 

And she was there purely for professional reasons. It was where all the Johns were. Plus Ruby was known to scout the area looking for new "dancers". Being Dallas, flat-chested short girls were considered the cream of the crop!
by alex_wilson
on Thu 04 Aug 2022, 8:36 pm
 
Search in: JFK
Topic: Proof that Pat Speer has no interest in the facts
Replies: 78
Views: 3402

Proof that Pat Speer has no interest in the facts

Ive  spent the last couple of hours  looking at all the available images of Prayerman I could find. 

Granted,  what I'm about to say is purely a personal opinion,  and utterly unscientific. 

But ,I  was thinking there's a very simple way to disprove the whole Prayerwoman  notion. 

If the image WAS of a female  then she must have been one helluva flat chested girl.

Sorry to be so crude folks,  but look at the images.  There's no sign of any cleavage. 
Honestly,  I don't know how anyone can come away from looking at those images thinking they were looking at a female. 

I know the image is blurred/ of relatively poor quality  etc( add all other appropriate disclaimers) but surely if the image was female,  especially when filmed at such an angle,  there would be some indication of " her" cleavage. 

I understand the various  " experts " ( our chum,  Pat Speer  et al) have had limited contact with  real life women ( plastic replicas do not count) but surely with Brian's  extensive experience with all manner of pornography the thought must have crossed his mind..

The absence of titties and the absence of evidence...or some such shit..

#toostupidtorealisetheyrestupid

Jump to: