Choose Search Type
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» thought for the day
Today at 1:58 pm by greg parker

» Journalist Ross Tarby reviews Lee Harvey Oswald's Cold Wa
Yesterday at 10:14 pm by greg parker

» How Could Detective Graves Not See The Gun?
Yesterday at 9:58 pm by greg parker

» Earle Cabell, Mayor of Dallas, TX 1963, Was A CIA Asset
Yesterday at 9:52 pm by greg parker

» Did Frazier Indirectly Identify Prayer Man
Yesterday at 8:26 pm by Vinny

» The Bolton Ford Incident
Yesterday at 6:38 pm by BC_II

» Craig's Mauser 7.65 stamp
Wed 16 Aug 2017, 3:13 pm by greg parker

» Hyde My Paine
Wed 16 Aug 2017, 4:24 am by Stan Dane

» hats off to Leo...
Tue 15 Aug 2017, 11:33 am by Ed. Ledoux

Log in

I forgot my password

Social bookmarking

Social bookmarking Digg  Social bookmarking Delicious  Social bookmarking Reddit  Social bookmarking Stumbleupon  Social bookmarking Slashdot  Social bookmarking Yahoo  Social bookmarking Google  Social bookmarking Blinklist  Social bookmarking Blogmarks  Social bookmarking Technorati  

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Keywords

Prayer  tsbd  frazier  PAINE  jack  jones  trial  ruby  mary  bledsoe  dick  larry  oswald  leaving  

RSS feeds


Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 


Affiliates
free forum
 



Boston Globe Ridicules JFK Researchers

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Boston Globe Ridicules JFK Researchers

Post by Vinny on Mon 13 Oct 2014, 1:02 am

Quite a crazy article from the Boston Globe newspaper.



http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/10/10/research-jfk-assassination-reddit-style/FsftpOBCc3nd7ATKI8OZZI/story.html#comments

Vinny

Posts : 362
Join date : 2013-08-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Boston Globe Ridicules JFK Researchers

Post by Guest on Mon 13 Oct 2014, 10:35 pm

Unfortunately, it is par for the course. Officials have never like being questioned in the face of their deficient claims. 

Seemingly it is always the tactic of quoting the most unsubstantiated and biased comments to support their view. 

While indeed some conspiracy advocates are not credible, neither are a significant amount of officials, Commission supporters, and contending evidence. 

While I did notice the cut and paste job of the comments, I did not see any evidence presented. I suppose not clarity but calumny is their alleged intent.

It must be quite reassuring to believe one knows all the answers without actually doing the research to arrive at them.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum