Jim pulls the same old stunt
Sat 02 Sep 2017, 10:24 am
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/23677-a-couple-of-real-gems-from-the-harvey-and-lee-website/?do=findComment&comment=359378
In the above post, he cites as proof of FBI alteration, an unsworn allegation by James Leon Simmons.
That's not "proof", Jim. It's evidence. There is enough EVIDENCE to suggest that the FBI may have altered statements in this case. But to extrapolate a possibility into a full-time job on the part of agents beggars belief. It is Jim's "Get Out of Jail Free Card" whenever he has no other explanation for something, the FBI alteration allegation comes out -- with no proof whatsoever in most specific instances that he cites. His MO is just to produce EVIDENCE of it on other areas of the case - claim that constitutes proof the FBI did alter stuff so they must have in this particular instance as well, because I can't explain it any other way.
It's the old thing about dogs. Jim says "a dog bit me the other day, so therefore all dogs bite". And then it turns out, he has a mark on his arm and assumed it is a dog bite.... convinces himself it positively is a dog bite and that therefore no dogs can ever be trusted.
Well, no good ever came from being a dog hater, Jim.
It gets us no closer to discovering if it was really a dog at all, or something else.
In the above post, he cites as proof of FBI alteration, an unsworn allegation by James Leon Simmons.
That's not "proof", Jim. It's evidence. There is enough EVIDENCE to suggest that the FBI may have altered statements in this case. But to extrapolate a possibility into a full-time job on the part of agents beggars belief. It is Jim's "Get Out of Jail Free Card" whenever he has no other explanation for something, the FBI alteration allegation comes out -- with no proof whatsoever in most specific instances that he cites. His MO is just to produce EVIDENCE of it on other areas of the case - claim that constitutes proof the FBI did alter stuff so they must have in this particular instance as well, because I can't explain it any other way.
It's the old thing about dogs. Jim says "a dog bit me the other day, so therefore all dogs bite". And then it turns out, he has a mark on his arm and assumed it is a dog bite.... convinces himself it positively is a dog bite and that therefore no dogs can ever be trusted.
Well, no good ever came from being a dog hater, Jim.
It gets us no closer to discovering if it was really a dog at all, or something else.
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum