Shaneyfelt and Position A

Help me out here.

Supposedly Position A designated the first available sighting of JFK from Sixth floor window. 


Really?

Who determined this? SHANEYFELT?
Because you can sight JFK coming down Houston Street from so called Snipers Nest.
I find it disingenuous to say Position A is earliest possible sighting as that is not shown from a photo on Sixth floor.

The photo we do have of Shaneyfelt in the recreation could be of shot 2 or 3 as the angle is not substantial 



Can anyone assist in the Position A conundrum?
As Shaneyfelt (anove) and Secret Service (below) do not mutually support each other.




I made the above as a meme. 
I added the image I to the window from another image showing the view out the window.
To be clear this recreation uses a studio and not Sixth Floor.
The angle needed though to get a Position A view is more akin to the meme than the Secret Service reenactment also above.

I Don't Find Position A credible from it being earliest possible sighting...

I Do think Position A shows how ridiculous Single Bull theory was.


Appeared the FBI(?) fudged the platting and shots to get JFK aligned to Connally from Snipers Nest (bugger all the rest)  ...simply put.

Ed

Ed,

Something has never gelled for me with these re-enactments especially the ones you've pointed to above. Certainly position A does not match with the official narrative. not even close. What is position A photograph related to anyway? It's appears to be a disassociated, disconnected separate shot of an image that in no way can be assumed has come from the camera attached to the rifle in the shayneyfelt re-enactment photograph.  

They certainly were on a mission to squeeze all of those square pegs into the round holes.

MAHALO MICK!

Yes glad you too are irritated by Position A and the obfuscation it involves.
I really want this to be easy to understand as a magic trick... the lady is never sawed in half.
More on the recreation vs reality to follow.

Then there is Zap 'starting' the Limo footage at 133 already past the supposed wide Truly turn.
The wide turn vs middle lane turn we see in frame 133... Jackson's(?) motorcycle is far frame left , and there is a lot of open real estate he had to cover vs limos driver side escorts running tight together along South curb after turn.
Truly gives the next worst accounting of the assassination, only second to Dan Rather's Zapruder film description. But I digress...

Then the boxes in the window vs position A especially if your believe the SS vs FBI which we see in the photo of Shaneyfelt sans boxes.
Then the 1st shot vs 2nd shot miss that is still not addressed by many as if both are true.
Why do the SS and FBI differ on the sequence of shots.
Then Gary Mack and Lost Bullet programs are offered up as if anyone witnessed or heard a metal pole or stop light being shot.... yet the actual witnesses, plural, accounts of bullet strike on pavement is forgotten or dismissed.
BTW when a bullet strikes 'pavement' it leaves a mark or divit and skips or ricochet. As it's given up most of its energy, it then will travel low along the 'pavement' until it runs out of energy and drops to pavement or hits something(curb)
Depending on angle, impact, distance to curb etc will affect its final result,
ie can a second ricochet send bit of concrete or bullet fragment on another trajectory,
or is there another ricochet that could account for James Tague' wound. (Besides by Gillette razor)

Then tell me the trajectory necessary to align John Kennedy's head wound entrance with the chrome strip dent. (without deflection) and where does it originate.

Appreciate any assistance
Cheers

Some Shaneyfelt documentation.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IgJ9p_n88RpUAppkfjh-x8QNJPH6g6vr/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/14Qaq1jg8oZXEEoJX9FGlsVH8P2NcB316/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16GkycG2MwOXaUdqsao1oki2bni6uvYB7/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oYBGWwzlsy_eBrIeSPiu6YWdawN8syEc/view?usp=sharing

With thanks to Malcolm Blunt for the goods.

That SS re-enactment is as faulty as it can be. It has Oswald sitting in the lunch room....and the descent from 6th to 2nd is missing...that rifleman position is as fake as aforementioned recreations.

Excellent stuff Bart.
I'll dig through it a bit more and post my thoughts and comments.

You nailed it though as the re-enactment and position A are mutually exclusive.

We can see Truly's wide turn and limo nearly hitting the curb to be pure disinformation either fed to him to regurgitate or he is offering Whopperz for the benefit of FBI not the Secret Service that's for sure!!!

Come across any Secret Service reports about Mr.Truly? I'd like to see some internal memos or reports about him from SS viewpoint?
No hurry or worries.... back to Position A
Cheers

Then tell me the trajectory necessary to align John Kennedy's head wound entrance with the chrome strip dent. (without deflection) and where does it originate.

DalTex bldg.?

I'll accept that as a general location.
I was hoping for a floor, as second and third floor have been batted about for so long. If timing can be established for that dented chrome, it's something that can pinpoint the rear shooter (Sorry Specter)
The FBI can be counted on for a mistimed misalignment.
SS is acting guilty, which leads to paranoid conclusions at odds with reality and a mistimed misalignment to follow.
A Dale Myers type animation without Myers' input would be excellent for this.

A Dale Myers type animation without Myers' input would be excellent for this.


Yes Ed,

An excellent thought. Translated - an honest interpretation of the evidence.
I like your thinking here Ed, we should seriously consider doing something.

AGREE.

I am game.
Who did ABC use to verify the animation work ...
Z-AXIS
They can verify ours too.
Ed

I think we could rip the old with a new one. If you're game.

Always.

Here is a study you might have seen
https://engrxiv.org/tncy5/download