REOPENKENNEDYCASE
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Search
Display results as :
Advanced Search
Log in
Social bookmarking
Social bookmarking reddit  Social bookmarking google      

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website
RSS feeds

Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 
Like/Tweet/+1
Affiliates
free forum
 



Go down
avatar
JFK_FNG
Posts : 11
Join date : 2021-09-09

David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4 Empty David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4

Thu 09 Sep 2021, 3:55 pm
Hi all, this is my first post here. I have no idea how to use this forum but hopefully I'll get the hang of it. My focus at the moment is the rifle chain of custody evidence. 

To start, there is plenty of evidence suggesting a suspicious origin of Waldman Exhibit 4, but David Josephs' theory is provably wrong. Mr. Josephs included the figure with the blue and red arrows (bottom) in his 74-page .pdf at CTKA and kennedysandking, has presented it at conferences and discussed it on Black Op Radio (I think). His main theory is that because the serial numbers appear to be recorded randomly, they were just copied off of the Waldman Exhibit 3 shipping slips. I used to do project management for the Army, and a lot of times we would have to figure out how to safely and efficiently repackage highly controlled items like hand grenades. I highlighted the serial numbers from each carton-shipping slip combination in a different color (top) and the rifles are recorded in exactly the way one would expect with a multi-person unpacking operation.

Mitchell Scibor (who disowned Waldman 4 under oath after taking credit for it in his 302 report) described the process as basically: the receiving department opens the cartons, removes the rifles, records the control number/serial number on Waldman 4, then tags the rifles with the control/serial combination (might be tag first but doesn't matter). 

Imagine two tables lined up, one with cartons on it, one with a guy with a box of tags and one guy with Waldman 4. As you can see in my figure, the first carton (orange) is opened up and basically unpacked first. As the last rifle of that carton is removed, five other cartons are opened nearly simultaneously (red, green, purple, blue, beige). The rifles are then recorded out of order, basically whoever passes the rifle to the tag/paper guy quickest gets that rifle recorded first. Carton 3598(beige) is slowest and might have had more tape on interior packing materials, been in the back, unpacked by a new guy, or something like that. As that group of five cartons is nearing completion, the next three cartons are opened (yellow, gray, teal). As those three cartons are nearing completion, the final carton is opened (pink) and unpacked almost sequentially since that is basically all that is left. In fact, Josephs hypothesis is impossible since three serial numbers recorded from the rifles DO NOT match the serial numbers on the corresponding Waldman 3 shipping slips (slip serial number and corresponding color/carton# at bottom of figure). The implications of this will be included in a future post, along with other legitimate reasons to be skeptical of Waldman 4. 


David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4 3224a611
David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4 C9820211
greg_parker
greg_parker
Admin
Posts : 7235
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 63
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia
http:// http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IXOA5ZK/ref=s9_simh_

David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4 Empty Re: David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4

Thu 09 Sep 2021, 4:13 pm
So far, so good in using. Welcome aboard and just yell out if you run jnto any posting issues. Look foward to the rest of this.

_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
              Lachie Hulme            
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
              Me


"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." 
Don Jeffries

"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott

https://gregrparker.com
avatar
alex_wilson
Posts : 963
Join date : 2019-04-10

David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4 Empty Re: David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4

Thu 09 Sep 2021, 8:01 pm
" With his latest work ' Waldman Exhibit 3' :a disorientating jumble of coloured arrows and squiggly lines, like something you might find splattered over the peeling walls of a drab forbidding Leningrad flophouse , after the turbulent young Picasso, and some fearsome Proletkult Industrial artist spent a frustratingly unconsummated night, Fezzo, the first, and as yet only member of the Nonsensicalist school, attempts to out Dada the Dadaists,. Not so much a work of art, more an existential cri de coeur of a man who has spent the best part of two decades, with a jaunty red fez tilted rakishly over one eye, as he was chased up and down the dimly lit side streets and alleyways of collective subconscious by an assortment of puny malnourished Hungarian doppelgangers, shadowy COINTELPRO goons, the outraged shotgun totin' emoticon dads of their not so dancing emoticon daughters, dreading the imminent pitter patter of tiny fezzettes,  and slick talking snake oil salesmen with their fantastical double doppelganger yarns..."

Brian Sewell

A Concise History of Surrealist Art. Broadcast 1st April  2010, BBC Radio 4 Longwave

_________________
A fez! A fez! My kingdom for a fez!!
The last words of King Richard HARVEY Plantagenet III 
Bosworth Field 1485

Is that a doppelganger in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me?
Artist, poet, polymath, cancer research prodigy Judyth Vary Baker's  first words to Lee HARVEY Oswald. New Orleans April 1963

For every HARVEY there must be an equal and opposite LEE
Professor Sandy Isaac Newton Laverne Shirley Fonzie Larsen's 
Famous 1st Law of Doppelganging

" Now can we work on getting Von Pein legally prohibited from using the internet" Albert Doyle. Champion of Free Speech and Credible Moderation
avatar
Vinny
Posts : 2360
Join date : 2013-08-27

David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4 Empty Re: David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4

Thu 09 Sep 2021, 8:23 pm
Welcome to ROKC.

_________________
Out With Bill Shelley In Front.
Jake_Sykes
Jake_Sykes
Posts : 869
Join date : 2016-08-15

David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4 Empty Re: David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4

Fri 10 Sep 2021, 11:28 am
Yes, welcome.

_________________
Release clear scans. Reveal the truth about Prayer Man. Preserve the history of the assassination of JFK.
Sponsored content

David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4 Empty Re: David Josephs is wrong about Waldman Exhibit 4

Back to top
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum