Choose Search Type

Display results as :

Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Back Yard Photography
Today at 3:37 pm by Paul Francisco Paso

» No Shots Fired From The TSBD
Today at 1:11 pm by Ed. Ledoux

» The Pierce Allman Story
Today at 5:49 am by barto

» New Prayer Man Image?
Yesterday at 2:55 pm by barto

» Buell Wesley Frazier: "Where’s your Rider?"
Yesterday at 12:02 pm by Stan Dane

» Herbert "Leon" Lee
Yesterday at 11:13 am by Terry W. Martin

» What Henry Wade Looked For In Jurors
Yesterday at 10:46 am by Ed. Ledoux

» "Prayer Man" on the Education Forum
Yesterday at 9:36 am by Ed. Ledoux

» JFK Links
Sat 27 May 2017, 3:00 pm by barto

Log in

I forgot my password

Social bookmarking

Social bookmarking Digg  Social bookmarking Delicious  Social bookmarking Reddit  Social bookmarking Stumbleupon  Social bookmarking Slashdot  Social bookmarking Yahoo  Social bookmarking Google  Social bookmarking Blinklist  Social bookmarking Blogmarks  Social bookmarking Technorati  

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

RSS feeds


free forum

anderson, pearson & the cia

View previous topic View next topic Go down

anderson, pearson & the cia

Post by greg parker on Tue 04 Jun 2013, 10:43 am

Pat Speer at the Ed Forum claims I was cherry-picking in naming Robert Allen and Paul Scott as evidence that CIA "leaks" get published because the CIA wants those "leaks" published. In cases where such "leaks" are not authorised by the CIA, the agency does not take it well. With these two, they instigated illegal taps to try and discover their sources.

Speer's response in part was to ask why nothing happened to Drew Pearson, Jack Anderson and a bunch of others.

In his follow-up post to my rebuttal, he stated

Jack Anderson, for example, broke so many stories damaging to the White House and CIA that Hunt made plans to kill him. He helped Pearson with his articles suggesting Kennedy was killed as blowback from the CIA's attempts on Castro. Although JOHNSON might have wanted this story out...this is NOT something the CIA would have wanted to be made public. Over the course of his career, Anderson published so much classified info, for that matter, that, when he died, a few years back, his personal papers were seized by the Federal Government, so that his sources could be discovered, and Top Secret documents kept from the public.
"He [Anderson] helped Pearson with his articles suggesting Kennedy was killed as blowback from the CIA's attempts on Castro."

Yup. Blowback. Against Kennedy. Because the CIA was operating under Kennedy's orders. But it's what wasn't mentioned in the above reply that is telling. One of their main sources was Frank Sturgis. Anyone who believes Sturgis went behind the back of Howard Hunt to give Pearson and Anderson classified information that Hunt did not want them to have, is either playing every reader for a sucker, or he just has plain rocks in his head. Among those so-called classified nuggets was that Oswald was a pro-Castro agent - meaning he was acting in the employ of Castro.

And as Speer admitted - it was the Federal Government who wanted to find out the sources after Anderson's death - not the CIA.

It is a known fact - and was pointed out to Speer - that both Anderson and Pearson were CIA assets in the so-called Mockingbird program. Speer has chosen to ignore this. Facts be damned.

Mixing Pop and Politics he asks me what the use is
I offer him embarrassment and my usual excuses
While looking down the corridor
Out to where the van is waiting
I'm looking for the Great Leap Forward

            Billy Bragg
 Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise. 
             Lachie Hulme            
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
greg parker

Posts : 4013
Join date : 2009-08-21
Age : 59
Location : Orange, NSW, Australia

View user profile http://

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum