dave reitzes wants to know...

what the strongest point of his "sceptical of all evidence except that produced by or for the government" article is.

I'd say it was the full stop at the end.

the empty space in his argument.

I just read it today.

Wow.  Could not believe how bad it was.

Every propaganda story in the book.

And he is not even current on the newest Z film research.  And now, I am not talking about falsification.

Tink Thompson is going to be presenting some really interesting stuff at Duquesne from what I understand.

Dave R. is not even aware of it.  But it makes his stuff look really silly.

But the whole article is silly.

Maybe because he is silly? Only Lifton and Ray Baby could buy this guy.

Lifton never got over being gulled by Thornley.

Here's a nice article on Reitzes by Jim DiEugenio:

http://www.ctka.net/2013/flipflop.html

Reitzes is an odd one; professes to be a big admirer of Bobby Kennedy; some years back I used to find some of his old "pro-conspiracy" pieces on the net, some of which were interesting, but invariably intellectually sloppy. He and I battled a bit on one of the Yahoo groups until he claimed I insulted him, and he would no longer respond; I asked him for clarification on this, and he never answered. But he has clearly joined the "big lie" club - which says if you repeat a falsehood enough, people will start to take it as fact.