Why the Warren Report is Inoperative: Plaque 3

http://www.ctka.net/2014/wr_anniv_03.html

What a legacy of lies.

Only McAdams can live with it.  Maybe Von Pein.

Everyone else, hold your nose as you read this..

James DiEugenio wrote:Only McAdams can live with it.  Maybe Von Pein.

Let's not forget Vinnie the Bug.

That is great Stan.

LOL, love the Patsy Express

James DiEugenio wrote:http://www.ctka.net/2014/wr_anniv_03.html

What a legacy of lies.

Only McAdams can live with it.  Maybe Von Pein.

Everyone else, hold your nose as you read this..

The last refuge of JFK scoundrels has to be referring to the "authoritative" nature of the Warren Report.

It's not their fault though... I mean, they're just a buncha politicians, what did you expect.

I blame J Edgar Hoover. That rotten bastid should have been behind bars. Obstruction of Justice was provable at that time, and if Johnson had covered for him it would have been an impeachable offense.

James DiEugenio wrote:That is great Stan.

LOL, love the Patsy Express

Thank you for the inspiration, Jim. Your Plaque Series is fantastic! Short, sweet, to the point, irrefutable. What the hell else does anybody want? Should be required reading for everybody who is old enough to vote.

Nice work, Jim.
I've seen that memo before David Josephs discovered it. Anthony Marsh I believe posted it on another forum a few years ago. It is very revealing. You can almost witness the conception of the SBT. They definitely had a problem with the shot sequence.

This is an excerpt from a 1-7-64 article in the Winnipeg Manitoba Free Press  WASHINGTON (CP) — Did Lee Harvey Oswald kill John Fitzgerald Kennedy? courtesy of Pat Speer which is equally revealing:

...On that day Kennedy was hit by two bullets fired into his limousine as his motorcade entered a road turn-in downtown Dallas. A third bullet hit Texas Governor John Connally, who was sitting in the limousine's jump seat, Connally has recovered from his wounds...

..The three bullets were estimated to have been fired within 6 1/2 seconds, said Rankin. While rifle experts maintain the firing of three shots in such a short period is possible, the evidence indicates that the last two shots came almost "on top of each other."...

..."Can a man operating a bolt action rifle fire two shots so quickly?"' asked Rankin. 'That is an example of the kind of thing that bothers us."

"What the commission wants to be able to do," he said, "is to publish a report that would eliminate doubt." Last month the Federal Bureau of Investigation gave the commission its report, concluding Oswald committed the crime unaided...


Personally, I think Rankin is being quite generous with his 6.5 seconds estimate. I make it 5.6 seconds for the 3 shots if I am right in thinking what they were probably thinking when viewing the Zapruder film. All the shots had been accounted for at this stage. None of them missed. The last 2 shots were basically back to back according to most ear-witness accounts which is the evidence he is probably referring to. This strongly suggests more than one shooter but they can't have that, can they?

Reminds me of a costume party.,,,,
Hey "guest," do I know you?