Choose Search Type
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» The FBI status of the case
Today at 2:20 am by Goban Saor

» question on odio
Yesterday at 2:47 pm by greg parker

» Hyde My Paine
Yesterday at 7:02 am by barto

» Cops never do wrong
Sun 23 Jul 2017, 12:54 pm by Jake Sykes

» Remembering Gary Mack: The No Rose-Colored Glasses Version
Sun 23 Jul 2017, 4:11 am by Stan Dane

» No Shots Fired From The TSBD
Sat 22 Jul 2017, 5:06 am by Ed. Ledoux

» The Unitarian Church
Fri 21 Jul 2017, 4:01 pm by Ed. Ledoux

» Connecting the Dots
Thu 20 Jul 2017, 5:22 pm by barto

» the cia and cultural exchange programs
Thu 20 Jul 2017, 4:21 pm by Ed. Ledoux

Log in

I forgot my password

Social bookmarking

Social bookmarking Digg  Social bookmarking Delicious  Social bookmarking Reddit  Social bookmarking Stumbleupon  Social bookmarking Slashdot  Social bookmarking Yahoo  Social bookmarking Google  Social bookmarking Blinklist  Social bookmarking Blogmarks  Social bookmarking Technorati  

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of REOPENKENNEDYCASE on your social bookmarking website

Keywords

RSS feeds


Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 


Affiliates
free forum
 



The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Page 4 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by Paul Francisco Paso on Fri 02 Dec 2016, 11:56 am

jack ferguson wrote:Stan,

Without agreement on what happened there can't really be progress. You have to ask yourself why disagreement rules in research circles. I think because telling the truth has never really been the goal. It's been to cover-up certain aspects and promote nonsense like the grassy knoll.
There is no such thing as agreement on what happened in this case. Proof is the ultimate endeavour. You can prosthelytize your research efforts all you like but at the end of the day it just becomes reserach and you can dump it with the rest of it we've had for 53 years.
Ther reason we hark on about Prayer Man is because if we can get that clearer scan its proof Oswald was on the steps. All the other stuff doesn't matter.
I've done the shot sequence to death on forums. Nothing not even reason works. The WC left the shot sequence alone and never committed to it. It was simple to deduce. Bring in all the witnesses to watch the Zapruder film and get them to time the shots or at least the first. As far as I know only Connally was invited to do it and he wasn't even a witness really more a victim. If they invited the witnesses the SBT could not happen. Now we know all this but cannot do anything about it. This needs proof and the proof is on the steps of the TSBD. Make no mistake about it. That guy is Oswald. We need further proof through a clearer scan.
avatar
Paul Francisco Paso

Posts : 461
Join date : 2014-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by jack ferguson on Sat 03 Dec 2016, 2:58 am

There were at least 5 shots, all of which are verified through government reports and independent research. Jfk was shot twice from the front and once from the rear. What's brand new is the back shot came at the very end immediately before the headshot. And it's that evidence, which could change the game in the modern day. The following times are approximate but close.

1. (160) Missed

2. Jfk shot in throat (223)

3. Connally (231-234)

4. Jfk shot in back about 1/10th of a second before headshot.

5. (313) Jfk shot above right eye

Mr. SPECTER - How many shots were there altogether?
Mrs. HILL - I have always said there were some four to six shots. There were three shots---one right after the other, and a distinct pause, or just a moment's pause, and then I heard more.
Mr. SPECTER - How long a time elapsed from the first to the third of what you described as the first three shots?
Mrs. HILL - They were rapidly---they were rather rapidly fired.
Mr. SPECTER - Could you give me an estimate on the timespan on those three shots?
Mrs. HILL - No; I don't think I can.
Mr. SPECTER - Now, how many shots followed what you described as the first three shots?
Mrs. HILL - I think there were at least four Or five shots and perhaps six, but I know there were more than three.

jack ferguson

Posts : 15
Join date : 2016-11-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by Paul Francisco Paso on Sat 03 Dec 2016, 3:35 am

http://www.dufourlaw.com/JFK/shot_pattern_excerpt.PDF

Go there, Jack. This is Andrew Masons work I told you about. He goes through various witness reports and statements and isn't selective. Like I said this guy is a lone gunmen theorist that dismisses the SBT. I've only come across two of those in my lifetime but the point is over 80 percent recall hearing 3 shots so I'll go with that for now. That first missed shot at Z160 is bogus. Ive watched the Zapruder at least a hundred times and no reaction from anyone around Z160 but the giveaway is that over 80 percent of witnesses say JFK reacted, slumped, pulled his hands up to his throat after the first shot. Its clear they are talking about Z223.
avatar
Paul Francisco Paso

Posts : 461
Join date : 2014-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by Jake Sykes on Sat 03 Dec 2016, 11:59 am

"Make no mistake about it. That guy is Oswald. We need further proof through a clearer scan"


Paul, why is it that I feel if a clear scan were to prove it's not Oswald, then such a scan would fall out for all of us to see like shit from a cow's ass?


just sayin'.
avatar
Jake Sykes

Posts : 153
Join date : 2016-08-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by jack ferguson on Sat 03 Dec 2016, 12:48 pm

I never thought until about a week ago that jfk was shot twice at the end. It all makes sense now. Mary taking a picture makes her account more reliable than most witnesses.

VOLUNTARY STATEMENT. Not Under Arrest Form No. 86 
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 
COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS
Before me, the undersigned authority, on this the 22nd day of November A.D. 1963 personally appeared Mary Ann Moorman, Address: 2832 Ripplewood, Dallas. Age 31, Phone No. DA 1-9390. 
Deposes and says

Mrs. Jean Hill and I were standing on the grass by the park on Elm Street between the underpass and the corner of Elm & Houston. I had a Polaroid Camera [sic] with me and was intending to take pictures of President Kennedy and the motorcade. As the motorcade started toward me I took two pictures. As President Kennedy was opposite me I took a picture of him. As I snapped the picture of President Kennedy, I heard a shot ring out. President Kennedy kind of slumped over. Then I heard another shot ring out and Mrs. Kennedy jumped up in the car and said, "My God he had been shot." When I heard these shots ring out, I fell to the ground to keep from being hit myself. I heard three or four shots in all. After the pictures I took were developed, the Picture [sic] of President Kennedy showed him slumped over. When the pictures were developed, they came out real light. These pictures have been turned over to Officers [sic] investigating this incident.
/s/ Mary Ann Moorman
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the 22nd day of Nov A. D. 1963
/s/ Aleen Davis 
Notary Public, Dallas County, Texas

jack ferguson

Posts : 15
Join date : 2016-11-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by Paul Francisco Paso on Sat 03 Dec 2016, 5:53 pm

Jake Sykes wrote:"Make no mistake about it. That guy is Oswald. We need further proof through a clearer scan"


Paul, why is it that I feel if a clear scan were to prove it's not Oswald, then such a scan would fall out for all of us to see like shit from a cow's ass?


just sayin'.
For sure Jake. Not only that the but the pricks would rub that shit on our faces.
I wonder why its so difficult to find. I mean they do have it but they don't know where it is. Lame for NBC standards as well as 6FM. Pathetic.
avatar
Paul Francisco Paso

Posts : 461
Join date : 2014-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by Jake Sykes on Sat 03 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm

Gotta believe they do know exactly where it is Paul.
In the meanwhile it leaves open for others to make shit up.
And do they ever. Seems like a new line of bs cycles through every couple of months. Obviously those efforts are intended for the uninitiated, or the purveyors of such nonsense or just plain loco.
avatar
Jake Sykes

Posts : 153
Join date : 2016-08-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by Paul Francisco Paso on Sun 04 Dec 2016, 12:26 am

Jake Sykes wrote:Gotta believe they do know exactly where it is Paul.
In the meanwhile it leaves open for others to make shit up.
And do they ever. Seems like a new line of bs cycles through every couple of months. Obviously those efforts are intended for the uninitiated, or the purveyors of such nonsense or just plain loco.
No doubt, Jake. Vaulted or offed somewhere unknown. In the meantime they'd rather have us counting shots and ignoring the fucking obvious.
avatar
Paul Francisco Paso

Posts : 461
Join date : 2014-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by Vinny on Sun 04 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm

Maybe it is hidden in Doyle's hospital room in the mental hospital where he is a patient at.

Vinny

Posts : 352
Join date : 2013-08-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by jack ferguson on Tue 06 Dec 2016, 6:37 am

Not until very recently did I realize that jfk was shot in the back right before the headshot. My focus was always on the exit wound and the headshot with some work put into the bullet hole in the windshield. I never had strong feelings about the last 2 shots, but mostly believed one was fired to confuse those on elm street. 

Everything important has finally come together and makes perfect sense for the universal belief that Kennedy was shot three times. Two of those shots coming from the front make any rear shooter totally irrelevant. This new evidence is the only way the government would ever revise this case because they could simply add a gunshot wound without changing any prior conclusions from decades ago. 

The back shot had to come from a different shooter because there wasn't enough time to get off another shot, as the last 2 shots were separated by less than a 1/4 second. It takes at least 3/4 of a second between shots.

"At the moment I looked at the back of the President I heard another fire-cracker noise and saw the shot hit the President about four inches down from the right shoulderA second shot followed immediately and hit the right rear high of the President's head."

For starters, the Zapruder film clearly shows jfk's back being impacted right before he's shot in the face. It kinda looks like a 'pow' from a batman episode. The other two films also show an impact but not quite the same way. What SS agent Glen Bennett reported seeing is exactly confirmed by all three films. For all intents and purposes the jfk assassination has finally been solved.


jack ferguson

Posts : 15
Join date : 2016-11-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by Paul Francisco Paso on Tue 06 Dec 2016, 11:23 am

Vinny wrote:Maybe it is hidden in Doyle's hospital room in the mental hospital where he is a patient at.
Doyle's not in a mental hospital, Vinny. He has 24/7 personal supervision. He is allocated computer time and his carer just has a cup of tea and reads a magazine while he is allowed an hour to rattle on his keyboard thinking surely nobody in their right mind would give little Brian the time of day. As long as he doesn't self harm the carer gets paid. Then its 3 to 4 zopoclines and strapped to bed for a tight sleep for Brian. He has a routine happening. Keeps everyone comfortable.


Last edited by Paul Francisco Paso on Tue 06 Dec 2016, 11:24 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : X)
avatar
Paul Francisco Paso

Posts : 461
Join date : 2014-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Facts about Connally's Wounds

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum