What Henry Wade Looked For In Jurors

First topic message reminder :

“What to look for in a juror.”


Source http://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/1977/june/the-law-and-henry-wade/


A. Attitudes.

1. You are not looking for a fair juror, but rather a strong, biased and sometimes hypocritical individual who believes that Defendants are different from them in kind, rather than degree.



2. You are not looking for any member of a minority group which may subject him to oppression -they almost always empathize with the accused.



3. You are not looking for the free thinkers and flower children.



B. Observation is worthwhile.

1. Look at the panel out in the hall before they are seated. You can spot the showoffs and the liberalsby how and to whom they are talking.



2.Observe the veniremen as they walk into the courtroom.

a. You can tell almost as much about a man by how he walks, as how he talks.

b. Look for physical afflictions. These people usually sympathize with the accused.



3. Dress.

a. Conservatively, well dressed people are generally stable and good for the State.

b. In many counties, the jury summons states that the appropriate dress is coat and tie. One who does not wear a coat and tie is often a non-conformist and therefore a bad State’s juror.

4. Women.

a. I don’t like women jurors because I can’t trust them.

b. They do, however, make the best jurors in cases involving crimes against children.

c. It is possible that their “women’s intuition” can help you if you can’t win your case with the facts.

d. Young women too often sympathize with the Defendant; old women wearing too much make-up are usually unstable, and therefore are bad State’s jurors.

e. It is impossible to keep women off your jury, but try to keep the ratio at least seven to five in favor of men.



5. Weight. Extremely overweight people, especially women and young men, indicates a lack of self-discipline and often times instability. I like the lean and hungry look.

6. Age. People over forty are more settled and more ready to believe that criminals should be punished.

7. Race. Minority races almost always empathize with the Defendant.

8. Demeanor.

a. Attentive, intelligent looking veniremen that you are able to communicate with on Voir Dire will generally be all right.

b. Always observe how the veniremen react when being questioned by the defense attorney, and compare it to the venireman’s reaction to you.

Thanks Barto, amazing stuff and great timing.....can use this stuff. Drain and the non existent finger print-priceless!

I am using some of this for my Paper which comes out in a few weeks, simply gold!!!

Wade incriminates himself over and over. Priceless stuff mate. This video at least for me proves Wade was involved in Fritz's railroad of Oswald. His recollections are like a well rehearsed script. Hmmmmm, same script writer as Frazier's.

Dallas Man Exonerated After 27 Years in Prison

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90172724

They DID have a palm-print before the rifle went to Washington.  Wade was being 100% honest on that.

When you talk slow like that it gives you time to think you know. Get yer story straight and stick to it like that. Uh huh.

greg parker wrote:They DID have a palm-print before the rifle went to Washington.  Wade was being 100% honest on that.

He is even (approximately) right about the time said palm-print was obtained.

I say, well done on your honesty and recall, Mr. Wade!!!

But where abouts in the interview is the follow-up question, "where and how was the palm-print obtained, Henry"? 

It was asked, wasn't it?

I mean, I mean, I mean, it's no secret. The answer is in a key report in the volumes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r43IefWoO_Y

Henry Wade Press Conference November 24 1963

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhckLcuEINg

Henry Wade Press Conference November 22 1963

Innocence project:

Dallas Texas. Exoneration of an innocent man

http://truthinjustice.org/dallas-eyewitness.htm

I had never heard Henry Wade directly admit that he condoned the lies some police officers told to establish “probable cause” for arrests and searches. I was a bit surprised to hear a younger attorney recall a talk Wade made to his law class at SMU. He said that Wade addressed the probable cause issue saying “If my officers don’t have probable cause when they make an arrest, they will have it when they get to the courthouse”. It could be argued, of course, that Wade was not endorsing this practice, but just acknowledged the inevitability of it. One thing was certain, he certainly took no action to inhibit or prevent it.

Gray, Edward. Henry Wade's Tough Justice: How Dallas County Prosecutors Led the Nation in Convicting the Innocent . Dog Ear Publishing. Kindle Edition.

https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/1986/may/the-chief/

As usual, the semi-mythical District Attorney of Dallas County for the past thirty-six years appears not only to be eroding his unlit cigar but eating it. He rips off a small bale of tobacco leaves and chews. For a while, nothing comes out. And these are not Winston Churchill’s favorites, the expensive seven-inch Romeo y Julietas or La Aroma de Cubas, but funky, stubby Travis Clubs. Finally he takes a mouthful of cold, black coffee strong enough to support a mouse, swills it around, then spits the tobacco-coffee puree earthward. As far as the interested parties can tell, most of it splats onto the floor.

Never ending.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/men-wrongfully-convicted-1976-murder-freed-43-years/story?id=62012500

Frank S Wright assistant DA.
Thanks to Malcolm Blunt

Wade DMN Interview 1993

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/alt.assassination.jfk/Prayer$20Man$20%7Csort:date/alt.assassination.jfk/p0PhnF5rRmI/T1e7jx1i1wwJ

Roe vs Wade revelation!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/19/roe-v-wade-norma-mccorvey-abortion-rights-documentary-aka-jane-roe

Wade and Alexander during the Ruby trial w an Oswald pic.
FWST 1964

barto wrote:Wade and Alexander during the Ruby trial w an Oswald pic.
FWST 1964

You can tell by the looks on their faces that they just hate him to death can't you? Ruby knows it too.

Jake_Sykes wrote:

barto wrote:Wade and Alexander during the Ruby trial w an Oswald pic.
FWST 1964

You can tell by the looks on their faces that they just hate him to death can't you? Ruby knows it too.

I desperately wish to do an expose' on Bill Alexander. He was in this up to his neck without any doubt at least to my mind, He was a horrible human being who cared little for others. I really do believe it was Fritz and he who had Oswald killed.

WADE REGARDING WOMEN

4. Women.

a. I don’t like women jurors because I can’t trust them.

b. They do, however, make the best jurors in cases involving crimes against children.

c. It is possible that their “women’s intuition” can help you if you can’t win your case with the facts.


JULIA POSTAL AFFIDAVIT REGARDING HER CALL TO THE POLICE

"Then he asked me what made me so sure that he was in the theatre. I told him I knew he was in there because he couldn't have gone by me. I told him to call it women's intuition or whatever he liked, but that man is in the theatre and he is running from something..."

Great find, Greg. I guess women's intuition trumped facts for Henry "win at all costs" Wade.  Any method to secure a conviction.