scenario

Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

As a starting point, do you

a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

b) Blame Israel?

c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

d) Interview James Files?

e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

________________________

Ye shall know them by their answer...

greg parker wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

As a starting point, do you

a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

b) Blame Israel?

c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

d) Interview James Files?

e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

________________________

Ye shall know them by their answer...

You missed out i) Bring in David Lifton, David Josephs and Peter Lemkin to explain what really happened to the media outlets

But, yeah, I'd be going with h)

The Prodigal Son wrote:

greg parker wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

As a starting point, do you

a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

b) Blame Israel?

c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

d) Interview James Files?

e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

________________________

Ye shall know them by their answer...

You missed out i) Bring in David Lifton, David Josephs and Peter Lemkin to explain what really happened to the media outlets

But, yeah, I'd be going with h)

Always miss something! Thanks Lee.

I would say A), C) & H), period, but thats me and I'm open to being educated. I think A) could possibly reveal some very damaging information relating to the case (Simpich theory) that could also (and possibly again) uncover leads as to who was involved with the LHO episode in Mexico City.

greg parker wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald was not killed. He goes to trial and is sentenced to death. By some miracle, that is commuted to life, but he is rotting in jail and still proclaiming his innocence.

You, as an appeals lawyer, are well aware of the DPD and Wade reputation for framing innocent people. You decide to try and help Oswald by finding new information that will help prove his innocence. 

As a starting point, do you

a) Go looking for mole hunts in the CIA?

b) Blame Israel?

c) Try and prove Bishop is Phillips?

d) Interview James Files?

e) Ask for Phillip Shenon's advice?

f) Read and follow all of Douglas Caddy's links to National Inquirer articles he provides at the Ed Forum?

g) Wait for all of the files to be released unredacted and see what they say?

h) Gather all the information you can about his alibi to try and establish whether it has any validity?

________________________

Ye shall know them by their answer...

Bugger me Greg, now you gone and done it! So many choices. What say all logical rational people. What say All of the above except (H). Yep! 54 years on and counting. Buffoons. Spot on Greg as always.

I'd go with H and L, but L doesn't exist 

Ed. Ledoux wrote:I'd go with H and L, but L doesn't exist 

No Lee, only Hardly!