Oswald's alibi - yet another look
+8
steely_dan
StanDane
Jake_Sykes
JFK_Case
barto
Vinny
Ed.Ledoux
greg_parker
12 posters
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 31 May 2022, 11:32 am
First topic message reminder :
A few weeks back I got a video call from a facebook friend who had concluded that there must have been an "inside man" in the TSBD. He wanted to know what I thought about that idea. I tried to explain about Roy Truly and this led to a discussion on Oswald's alibi and Truly's role in burying it. Unlike some, I'm not that great at trying to explain this stuff verbally. I need to be able to point to docs and graphs and photos and other fun stuff for clarity and reinforcement of a point - and also to stay on topic and not go off on tangents - or forget where I am at in the narrative!
Anyhow, I gave up, but promised I would do something in writing and send it to him.
That got me thinking about the best way to present it and how to keep it simple and easy to follow.
Around this time, I dscovered Opera Pinboards, so decided to test them with this work.
In the meantine of course, Bart had put his piece out on similar themes. Have been too busy to read it but will remedy that today.
Hopefully the works compliment each other. I have more to come. A side benefit for me doing this is that it makes it so much easier to put it together for the volumes I have resumed work on.
https://gregrparker.com/pinboards/
Was going to post this in Bart's thread because of the similarity of themes, but thought better of it. Don't want to distract from Bart's work. The timing I know is terrible, but it was not planned that way. I could have had this out much sooner, but Pinboards is still in Beta mode and I encountered a lot of issues getting it done.
A few weeks back I got a video call from a facebook friend who had concluded that there must have been an "inside man" in the TSBD. He wanted to know what I thought about that idea. I tried to explain about Roy Truly and this led to a discussion on Oswald's alibi and Truly's role in burying it. Unlike some, I'm not that great at trying to explain this stuff verbally. I need to be able to point to docs and graphs and photos and other fun stuff for clarity and reinforcement of a point - and also to stay on topic and not go off on tangents - or forget where I am at in the narrative!
Anyhow, I gave up, but promised I would do something in writing and send it to him.
That got me thinking about the best way to present it and how to keep it simple and easy to follow.
Around this time, I dscovered Opera Pinboards, so decided to test them with this work.
In the meantine of course, Bart had put his piece out on similar themes. Have been too busy to read it but will remedy that today.
Hopefully the works compliment each other. I have more to come. A side benefit for me doing this is that it makes it so much easier to put it together for the volumes I have resumed work on.
https://gregrparker.com/pinboards/
Was going to post this in Bart's thread because of the similarity of themes, but thought better of it. Don't want to distract from Bart's work. The timing I know is terrible, but it was not planned that way. I could have had this out much sooner, but Pinboards is still in Beta mode and I encountered a lot of issues getting it done.
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
- JFK_FNG
- Posts : 268
Join date : 2021-09-09
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 4:29 am
Just my two cents. The one thing that initially got me thinking that the official story of the lunchroom encounter is shit is the automatic door and the angle of the window to the staircase. Baker’s story about spotting Oswald walking away from him through that window is just a joke. To keep the lunchroom encounter you have to invent a scenario that isn’t really supported by any evidence, e.g. Oswald walking towards the door after coming upstairs through the office, arriving at the exact moment Baker is passing the second floor, and turning around when seeing him, which is what Doudna proposed at the Ed forum. I just don’t buy it.
Also, the supposedly “devastating” essay Doudna posted in support of the lunchroom encounter was anything but IMO. I forget who wrote it but the author used the Bugliosian strategy of just handwaving away problematic evidence with condescending prose and claiming his explanations were 100% correct. Compare that essay to Bart’s and it’s immediately obvious who has the more objective analysis of the evidence.
Just like everything else in this case, the evidence for the lunchroom encounter is ambiguous, and to determine what really happened you have to assemble all of the available data into some sort of probability distribution and attempt to evaluate which scenario has the highest probability of being correct. Agree or disagree but you have to at the very least admit there is a non-zero probability of the lunchroom encounter being bullshit. Assigning weight to different data points is subjective as hell, and dependent on bias, but the theory proposed by Murphy, Bart, etc. is supported by enough credible evidence that to fully “debunk” it you have to invent alternate explanations for each item of contradictory evidence out of thin air.
Also, the supposedly “devastating” essay Doudna posted in support of the lunchroom encounter was anything but IMO. I forget who wrote it but the author used the Bugliosian strategy of just handwaving away problematic evidence with condescending prose and claiming his explanations were 100% correct. Compare that essay to Bart’s and it’s immediately obvious who has the more objective analysis of the evidence.
Just like everything else in this case, the evidence for the lunchroom encounter is ambiguous, and to determine what really happened you have to assemble all of the available data into some sort of probability distribution and attempt to evaluate which scenario has the highest probability of being correct. Agree or disagree but you have to at the very least admit there is a non-zero probability of the lunchroom encounter being bullshit. Assigning weight to different data points is subjective as hell, and dependent on bias, but the theory proposed by Murphy, Bart, etc. is supported by enough credible evidence that to fully “debunk” it you have to invent alternate explanations for each item of contradictory evidence out of thin air.
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
For a cop investigating shots fired, Baker never asked a sole about gunshots.
This was like Greg says... Baker didnt run into the TSBD... He walked over from the Daltex.
Marrion wasnt asking anyone by then about shots.
This was like Greg says... Baker didnt run into the TSBD... He walked over from the Daltex.
Marrion wasnt asking anyone by then about shots.
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 7:07 am
Truly said he heard something as he is going back to find where Baker went.
So Truly was able to hear Baker telling Lee to come over here ... through a closed fire door?
Yet Hine in open space, and next to the open door to the hallway where Baker is, and then Truly too.
Hears or sees none of this?
Hine wasnt on a telephone call as the phones went quiet. So dead quiet especially after parade has gone by. Yet here is a witness on that floor near the lunchroom and overhears no such thing.
If I were Geneva Id have called Truly and Baker liars and accountable in part for Lee's death.
So Walton care to explain.
Or is the sand too comfy to pop your head out with anything remarkable?
So Truly was able to hear Baker telling Lee to come over here ... through a closed fire door?
Yet Hine in open space, and next to the open door to the hallway where Baker is, and then Truly too.
Hears or sees none of this?
Hine wasnt on a telephone call as the phones went quiet. So dead quiet especially after parade has gone by. Yet here is a witness on that floor near the lunchroom and overhears no such thing.
If I were Geneva Id have called Truly and Baker liars and accountable in part for Lee's death.
So Walton care to explain.
Or is the sand too comfy to pop your head out with anything remarkable?
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 8:29 am
Want somethong remarkable.
Lee had three orders for Scott Foresman books to fill on the clipboard found by Frankie Kaiser,
The report by Pinkston said these books to fill these 3 orders were located on the 1st and 6th floors.
Problem.
Sixth floor is under construction.
Rows of books have been moved and are no longer in their "Alphabetical Arrangement" as Truly stated. Lee had just learned this Arrangement.
It might take the whole afternoon to hunt through their mess to fill a single book order in the disorder.
Aisle of books were moved between other rows according to floor laying crew.
It is probative to question the validity of the orders as one was a freebie book for a New Mexico teacher.
One was an SMU order for a single refrence book.
Then one regular type order for ten text books.
Perhaps the ten books would be on 1st floor.
The legal book might not be and good luck finding it readily without some help upstairs...
I'd wait till after lunch.
Seems thats what Lee was going to do.
I find the Fritz Hosty notes ask Lee about the building and he tells them what each floor is, office or storage. But the notes of this only goes up to 5th floor, as if they arent even interested in 6th floor!
Cheers!
Ed
Lee had three orders for Scott Foresman books to fill on the clipboard found by Frankie Kaiser,
The report by Pinkston said these books to fill these 3 orders were located on the 1st and 6th floors.
Problem.
Sixth floor is under construction.
Rows of books have been moved and are no longer in their "Alphabetical Arrangement" as Truly stated. Lee had just learned this Arrangement.
It might take the whole afternoon to hunt through their mess to fill a single book order in the disorder.
Aisle of books were moved between other rows according to floor laying crew.
It is probative to question the validity of the orders as one was a freebie book for a New Mexico teacher.
One was an SMU order for a single refrence book.
Then one regular type order for ten text books.
Perhaps the ten books would be on 1st floor.
The legal book might not be and good luck finding it readily without some help upstairs...
I'd wait till after lunch.
Seems thats what Lee was going to do.
I find the Fritz Hosty notes ask Lee about the building and he tells them what each floor is, office or storage. But the notes of this only goes up to 5th floor, as if they arent even interested in 6th floor!
Cheers!
Ed
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 8:47 am
Mahalo Tom!
"I forget who wrote it but the author used the Bugliosian strategy of just handwaving away problematic evidence with condescending prose and claiming his explanations were 100% correct. Compare that essay to Bart’s and it’s immediately obvious who has the more objective analysis of the evidence."
Spot on.
Lots of hand waiving with a lot of their problems ... SFLR, Mailbox Shuffle, Ruth's Truths, Baker's Baldface, The Whole Case in general, and dare say even that film has to account for a few waves.
Being even handed with ALL the evidence is key to any solutions. ie not spinning ones wheels wondering why all the other cars are so far ahead and blaming the other cars.
Here's to gapping the competion
Ed
"I forget who wrote it but the author used the Bugliosian strategy of just handwaving away problematic evidence with condescending prose and claiming his explanations were 100% correct. Compare that essay to Bart’s and it’s immediately obvious who has the more objective analysis of the evidence."
Spot on.
Lots of hand waiving with a lot of their problems ... SFLR, Mailbox Shuffle, Ruth's Truths, Baker's Baldface, The Whole Case in general, and dare say even that film has to account for a few waves.
Being even handed with ALL the evidence is key to any solutions. ie not spinning ones wheels wondering why all the other cars are so far ahead and blaming the other cars.
Here's to gapping the competion
Ed
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 8:59 am
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 1:01 pm
Here is additional support for Lee's alibi.
Geneva Hine.
She saw no Oswald, and especially no coke carrying Lee ... and certainly no Baker and Truly duo! Nor them accosting Lee in the lunch room hallway.
She is right there either in that back hallway or about to her desk in that timing by the commission... of course they didnt run the time trial with HINE in the mix as it destroys Baker and Truly's fake encounter in the SFLR.
I have a bone to pick with camera location 27 as its not it the correct location it should be together with 23 & 24.
As though the camera spun around in one spot is more precise.
Geneva is within sight and hearshot of the stairwell door and lunchroom.
Rest in peace Geneva L. Hine you cinched the case against Baker and Truly.
Ed
Geneva Hine.
She saw no Oswald, and especially no coke carrying Lee ... and certainly no Baker and Truly duo! Nor them accosting Lee in the lunch room hallway.
She is right there either in that back hallway or about to her desk in that timing by the commission... of course they didnt run the time trial with HINE in the mix as it destroys Baker and Truly's fake encounter in the SFLR.
I have a bone to pick with camera location 27 as its not it the correct location it should be together with 23 & 24.
As though the camera spun around in one spot is more precise.
Geneva is within sight and hearshot of the stairwell door and lunchroom.
Rest in peace Geneva L. Hine you cinched the case against Baker and Truly.
Ed
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 7:13 pm
It's good to have a collection of those witness statements that specifically mentioned not seeing a policeman enter the front of the building with Truly.
I recall Robert Prudhomme pointing out (here or at the Ed Forum, or both) that Baker seems to be running right past the entrance and towards the Dal-Tex building. Was Prudhomme the first person to spot this? If so, he made a valuable contribution. I remember there was criticism of his gun-related interests; if that's why he's no longer active, it's a shame.
It's probably a few decades too late to look into who might have seen Baker enter the Dal-Tex, if that's where he ended up, or who might have witnessed his presence inside the building, if his encounter with a man on a third or fourth floor took place there rather than in the book depository.
The Dal-Tex building has received remarkably little attention from the authorities and from critics, given that it had more than its fair share of suspicious activity. We know of three people who were taken into police custody from the building:
1 - William Sharp, "who the officers said had been up in the building across the street from the book depository without a good reason," according to J.B. Leavelle, who took him into custody (WC Hearings and Exhibits, vol.20, p.499: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1137#relPageId=519). No statement seems to have been taken from Sharp.
2 - Larry Florer was apparently looking for a phone and was directed to the third floor. He was taken into custody by Officer W.H. Denham, made a statement, and was released (see WCHE, vol.19, p.476 [https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1136#relPageId=494] for Florer's statement and p.517 for Denham). Florer's statement is slightly ambiguous, claiming that he was told about a pay phone in the County Records building, but that he was directed instead to "a lot of phones on the third floor of this building that I was standing in front of" by a woman who worked on the third floor of that building. Richard Trask (Pictures of the Pain, p.547) interprets this to mean that Florer went into the County Records building, but the implication (to me, at least) is that Florer went into a different building, which must have been the Dal-Tex.
3 - Eugene Brading, aka Jim Braden, also claimed to have been on the third floor, looking for a phone. After descending to the ground floor, he was taken into custody by Deputy Sheriff C.L. Lewis, but was released after giving a false name and a nothing-to-see-here statement (CE 2003, p.12 [WCHE, vol.24, p.202]: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1140#relPageId=220).
Brading's links to the mafia might have been what brought him to the attention of the HSCA, who questioned him (the transcript has no official designation: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19906). Brading also made a deposition which covered much of the same ground, but in less detail (NARA Record Number 180-10103-1037: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19907). Brading claimed that he was nowhere near the Dal-Tex building during the assassination, but his account has inconsistencies and, as far as I'm aware, no corroboration.
He claimed to have watched the motorcade from the opposite side of the road from the Titche-Goettinger department store, which was at 1901 Elm Street.* After the motorcade had passed, he walked a block or two to the Federal Building to meet his probation officer, and spent around 15 minutes there. He then walked down the street, bought a sandwich, and eventually found himself caught up in the commotion outside the TSBD and the Dal-Tex building.
Like Florer, Bradiing apparently went into the Dal-Tex building in search of a phone. If Brading's account is truthful, he took a freight elevator up to the third floor of the Dal-Tex, where he found a woman trying to use a pay phone, which was apparently the only pay phone in the vicinity. The woman told him that the phone was out of order. Brading then got back in the elevator and returned to the ground floor, where the elevator operator pointed him out to a uniformed policeman as a stranger in the building.
He claimed that all of this occurred around half an hour after he had seen the motorcade further along Elm Street, and that he was present when what looked like a rifle was taken out of the book depository. That happened at about 2.30, at least an hour and a half after Brading would have come to the attention of Deputy Sheriff Lewis, who presumably wouldn't have waited an hour and a half before escorting a potential suspect from the scene of the crime. I don't suppose it's possible to reconstruct Lewis's movements to see if they confirm or deny anything in Brading's account (see p.50 onwards of Braden's HSCA interview for his account of being inside the Dal-Tex: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19906#relPageId=50).
Regarding a possible encounter between Baker and an employee on the third floor of the Dal-Tex, it's curious that at least two non-employees found themselves on the third floor. Also curious is the fact that one of these non-employees had a criminal record and gave the authorities a false name and a ready-made story that got him released from questioning.
It would be interesting to know if there are any photos or home movies that show identifiable individuals going into or out of the Dal-Tex building after the assassination. I'm not aware of any. There's more than one photo floating around of Larry Florer in the vicinity of the Dal-Tex building, but I don't think it shows much background detail. Photos of Brading in the area might confirm or contradict the timetable he gave.
It would also be interesting to know whether the Dal-Tex building actually contained any pay phones. A woman who worked there apparently told Florer that there weren't any, but Brading claimed there was one on the third floor. I'd be inclined to believe the woman who actually worked on the third floor of the building, assuming that she did and wasn't referring to the Criminal Courts building.
--
* When looking up the address of the department store (http://www.thedepartmentstoremuseum.org/2010/06/titche-goettinger-co-dallas.html), I discovered that there is or was a W.C. Stripling department store in Fort Worth. Two Striplings! Both of them in Fort Worth! That means they're doppelgangers!
I recall Robert Prudhomme pointing out (here or at the Ed Forum, or both) that Baker seems to be running right past the entrance and towards the Dal-Tex building. Was Prudhomme the first person to spot this? If so, he made a valuable contribution. I remember there was criticism of his gun-related interests; if that's why he's no longer active, it's a shame.
It's probably a few decades too late to look into who might have seen Baker enter the Dal-Tex, if that's where he ended up, or who might have witnessed his presence inside the building, if his encounter with a man on a third or fourth floor took place there rather than in the book depository.
The Dal-Tex building has received remarkably little attention from the authorities and from critics, given that it had more than its fair share of suspicious activity. We know of three people who were taken into police custody from the building:
1 - William Sharp, "who the officers said had been up in the building across the street from the book depository without a good reason," according to J.B. Leavelle, who took him into custody (WC Hearings and Exhibits, vol.20, p.499: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1137#relPageId=519). No statement seems to have been taken from Sharp.
2 - Larry Florer was apparently looking for a phone and was directed to the third floor. He was taken into custody by Officer W.H. Denham, made a statement, and was released (see WCHE, vol.19, p.476 [https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1136#relPageId=494] for Florer's statement and p.517 for Denham). Florer's statement is slightly ambiguous, claiming that he was told about a pay phone in the County Records building, but that he was directed instead to "a lot of phones on the third floor of this building that I was standing in front of" by a woman who worked on the third floor of that building. Richard Trask (Pictures of the Pain, p.547) interprets this to mean that Florer went into the County Records building, but the implication (to me, at least) is that Florer went into a different building, which must have been the Dal-Tex.
3 - Eugene Brading, aka Jim Braden, also claimed to have been on the third floor, looking for a phone. After descending to the ground floor, he was taken into custody by Deputy Sheriff C.L. Lewis, but was released after giving a false name and a nothing-to-see-here statement (CE 2003, p.12 [WCHE, vol.24, p.202]: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1140#relPageId=220).
Brading's links to the mafia might have been what brought him to the attention of the HSCA, who questioned him (the transcript has no official designation: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19906). Brading also made a deposition which covered much of the same ground, but in less detail (NARA Record Number 180-10103-1037: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19907). Brading claimed that he was nowhere near the Dal-Tex building during the assassination, but his account has inconsistencies and, as far as I'm aware, no corroboration.
He claimed to have watched the motorcade from the opposite side of the road from the Titche-Goettinger department store, which was at 1901 Elm Street.* After the motorcade had passed, he walked a block or two to the Federal Building to meet his probation officer, and spent around 15 minutes there. He then walked down the street, bought a sandwich, and eventually found himself caught up in the commotion outside the TSBD and the Dal-Tex building.
Like Florer, Bradiing apparently went into the Dal-Tex building in search of a phone. If Brading's account is truthful, he took a freight elevator up to the third floor of the Dal-Tex, where he found a woman trying to use a pay phone, which was apparently the only pay phone in the vicinity. The woman told him that the phone was out of order. Brading then got back in the elevator and returned to the ground floor, where the elevator operator pointed him out to a uniformed policeman as a stranger in the building.
He claimed that all of this occurred around half an hour after he had seen the motorcade further along Elm Street, and that he was present when what looked like a rifle was taken out of the book depository. That happened at about 2.30, at least an hour and a half after Brading would have come to the attention of Deputy Sheriff Lewis, who presumably wouldn't have waited an hour and a half before escorting a potential suspect from the scene of the crime. I don't suppose it's possible to reconstruct Lewis's movements to see if they confirm or deny anything in Brading's account (see p.50 onwards of Braden's HSCA interview for his account of being inside the Dal-Tex: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19906#relPageId=50).
Regarding a possible encounter between Baker and an employee on the third floor of the Dal-Tex, it's curious that at least two non-employees found themselves on the third floor. Also curious is the fact that one of these non-employees had a criminal record and gave the authorities a false name and a ready-made story that got him released from questioning.
It would be interesting to know if there are any photos or home movies that show identifiable individuals going into or out of the Dal-Tex building after the assassination. I'm not aware of any. There's more than one photo floating around of Larry Florer in the vicinity of the Dal-Tex building, but I don't think it shows much background detail. Photos of Brading in the area might confirm or contradict the timetable he gave.
It would also be interesting to know whether the Dal-Tex building actually contained any pay phones. A woman who worked there apparently told Florer that there weren't any, but Brading claimed there was one on the third floor. I'd be inclined to believe the woman who actually worked on the third floor of the building, assuming that she did and wasn't referring to the Criminal Courts building.
--
* When looking up the address of the department store (http://www.thedepartmentstoremuseum.org/2010/06/titche-goettinger-co-dallas.html), I discovered that there is or was a W.C. Stripling department store in Fort Worth. Two Striplings! Both of them in Fort Worth! That means they're doppelgangers!
- Vinny
- Posts : 3409
Join date : 2013-08-27
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 8:25 pm
I recall Robert Prudhomme pointing out (here or at the Ed Forum, or both) that Baker seems to be running right past the entrance and towards the Dal-Tex building. Was Prudhomme the first person to spot this? If so, he made a valuable contribution.
https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/21771-who-saw-baker-enter-the-tsbd/#comment-298563
https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/21771-who-saw-baker-enter-the-tsbd/#comment-298563
_________________
Out With Bill Shelley In Front.
- alex_wilson
- Posts : 1333
Join date : 2019-04-10
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 9:19 pm
This is what real research looks like.
Unencumbered by pet theories, preferred narratives or predetermined conclusions.
Going back to the primary sources and then, carefully and methodically , following the evidence WHERE IT LEADS , rather than forcing clumsy, cherry picked fragments into the straight jacket of predetermined theories.
The 2FLRE has long exerted a malign, almost hypnotic influence over otherwise well intentioned researchers. Primarily because it was long thought to be one of strongest indications of Oswald's innocence.
Too much valuable time has been wasted going round and round in circles. Until certain researchers accept the self evident truth: facts are neutral, until they stop trying to tribalise them, clinging onto provable bullshit , simply because the bullshit in question points towards conspiracy , until they have the guts to examine their own beliefs with the same rigour usually reserved for lone nutists , then they'll keep on going round in circles.
Reading through the evidence that's been accumulated, you can see the cover up as it develops..Almost in real time. You can trace the deception as it evolves , and in certain cases, as it mutates.
Unearthing Oswald's first day alibi , exposing the actual mechanics of the frame ( while highlighting the incontrovertible, and utterly damning fact, that he was at the tender mercies of a PD and a DA to whom framing innocent suspects was SOP) and proving Oswald's innocence , by way of sober factually based analysis , rather than by building grandiose wish dreams and castles in the air, remains our last best chance of getting something done.
Individually and collectively, there needs to be the courage and the honesty to admit failure, likewise to re examine certain long cherished conspiracy friendly facts and witnesses. And, perhaps most importantly, stop viewing the case through the distorting prism of pet theories.
For me the demolition of the 2FLRE was something of an epiphany..In the context of assassination research going back and re examining EVERYTHING , even facts and witnesses long considered bulwarks of the pro conspiracy case seemed like a pretty profound idea.
Establishing Oswald's first day alibi and proving his innocence , with hard facts instead of hand waving and airy supposition , would be a monumental breakthrough. The " whys" come after the " how" has been proven.
Great thread folks.
Unencumbered by pet theories, preferred narratives or predetermined conclusions.
Going back to the primary sources and then, carefully and methodically , following the evidence WHERE IT LEADS , rather than forcing clumsy, cherry picked fragments into the straight jacket of predetermined theories.
The 2FLRE has long exerted a malign, almost hypnotic influence over otherwise well intentioned researchers. Primarily because it was long thought to be one of strongest indications of Oswald's innocence.
Too much valuable time has been wasted going round and round in circles. Until certain researchers accept the self evident truth: facts are neutral, until they stop trying to tribalise them, clinging onto provable bullshit , simply because the bullshit in question points towards conspiracy , until they have the guts to examine their own beliefs with the same rigour usually reserved for lone nutists , then they'll keep on going round in circles.
Reading through the evidence that's been accumulated, you can see the cover up as it develops..Almost in real time. You can trace the deception as it evolves , and in certain cases, as it mutates.
Unearthing Oswald's first day alibi , exposing the actual mechanics of the frame ( while highlighting the incontrovertible, and utterly damning fact, that he was at the tender mercies of a PD and a DA to whom framing innocent suspects was SOP) and proving Oswald's innocence , by way of sober factually based analysis , rather than by building grandiose wish dreams and castles in the air, remains our last best chance of getting something done.
Individually and collectively, there needs to be the courage and the honesty to admit failure, likewise to re examine certain long cherished conspiracy friendly facts and witnesses. And, perhaps most importantly, stop viewing the case through the distorting prism of pet theories.
For me the demolition of the 2FLRE was something of an epiphany..In the context of assassination research going back and re examining EVERYTHING , even facts and witnesses long considered bulwarks of the pro conspiracy case seemed like a pretty profound idea.
Establishing Oswald's first day alibi and proving his innocence , with hard facts instead of hand waving and airy supposition , would be a monumental breakthrough. The " whys" come after the " how" has been proven.
Great thread folks.
_________________
A fez! A fez! My kingdom for a fez!!
The last words of King Richard HARVEY Plantagenet III
Bosworth Field 1485
Is that a doppelganger in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me?
Artist, poet, polymath, cancer research prodigy Judyth Vary Baker's first words to Lee HARVEY Oswald. New Orleans April 1963
For every HARVEY there must be an equal and opposite LEE
Professor Sandy Isaac Newton Laverne Shirley Fonzie Larsen's
Famous 1st Law of Doppelganging
" To answer your question I ALWAYS look for mundane reasons for seeming anomalies before considering sinister explanations. Only a fool would do otherwise. And I'm no fool" The esteemed Professor Larsen From his soon to be published self help book " The Trough of Enlightenment "( Trine Day Foreword Vince Palamara)
" Once you prove Davidson's woman's face then Stanton's breasts follow naturally " Brian Doyle
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Tue 07 Jun 2022, 11:50 pm
I put this little thing together a few years ago to show Baker's path as he ran...somewhere.
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Wed 08 Jun 2022, 3:42 am
_________________
Prayer Man: More Than a Fuzzy Picture (E-)Book @ Amazon.
Prayer-Man.com
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Wed 08 Jun 2022, 5:38 am
CHEERS!JeremyBojczuk wrote:It's good to have a collection of those witness statements that specifically mentioned not seeing a policeman enter the front of the building with Truly.
AGREED AND "BAKERS RUN" BY STAN MOPS IT UP.
I recall Robert Prudhomme pointing out (here or at the Ed Forum, or both) that Baker seems to be running right past the entrance and towards the Dal-Tex building. Was Prudhomme the first person to spot this? If so, he made a valuable contribution. I remember there was criticism of his gun-related interests; if that's why he's no longer active, it's a shame.
It's probably a few decades too late to look into who might have seen Baker enter the Dal-Tex, if that's where he ended up, or who might have witnessed his presence inside the building, if his encounter with a man on a third or fourth floor took place there rather than in the book depository.
I BELIEVE THERE WAS ENOUGH INTERVIEWS AT THE TIME TO COVER THAT ENTRY BY BAKER.
ONLY ONE AGREES WITH THE TIMING OR ENTRY.
The Dal-Tex building has received remarkably little attention from the authorities and from critics, given that it had more than its fair share of suspicious activity.
VERY TRUE WE NEEDED THE SAME COVERAGE AS THE TSBD GOT BUT WERE NOT GIVEN THIS BY AUTHORITIES AND THE SUSPICION AND FINGER POINTING WAS AT DALTEX,,,ZAPRUDERS BLDG.
We know of three people who were taken into police custody from the building:
1 - William Sharp, "who the officers said had been up in the building across the street from the book depository without a good reason," according to J.B. Leavelle, who took him into custody (WC Hearings and Exhibits, vol.20, p.499: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1137#relPageId=519). No statement seems to have been taken from Sharp.
WE HAVE A THREAD ON SHARPER.
HE WAS THE ELEVATOR OPERATOR.
...LEAVELLE...ha!
2 - Larry Florer was apparently looking for a phone and was directed to the third floor. He was taken into custody by Officer W.H. Denham, made a statement, and was released (see WCHE, vol.19, p.476 [https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1136#relPageId=494] for Florer's statement and p.517 for Denham). Florer's statement is slightly ambiguous, claiming that he was told about a pay phone in the County Records building, but that he was directed instead to "a lot of phones on the third floor of this building that I was standing in front of" by a woman who worked on the third floor of that building. Richard Trask (Pictures of the Pain, p.547) interprets this to mean that Florer went into the County Records building, but the implication (to me, at least) is that Florer went into a different building, which must have been the Dal-Tex.
3 - Eugene Brading, aka Jim Braden, also claimed to have been on the third floor, looking for a phone. After descending to the ground floor, he was taken into custody by Deputy Sheriff C.L. Lewis, but was released after giving a false name and a nothing-to-see-here statement (CE 2003, p.12 [WCHE, vol.24, p.202]: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1140#relPageId=220).
Brading's links to the mafia might have been what brought him to the attention of the HSCA, who questioned him (the transcript has no official designation: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19906). Brading also made a deposition which covered much of the same ground, but in less detail (NARA Record Number 180-10103-1037: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19907). Brading claimed that he was nowhere near the Dal-Tex building during the assassination, but his account has inconsistencies and, as far as I'm aware, no corroboration.
He claimed to have watched the motorcade from the opposite side of the road from the Titche-Goettinger department store, which was at 1901 Elm Street.* After the motorcade had passed, he walked a block or two to the Federal Building to meet his probation officer, and spent around 15 minutes there. He then walked down the street, bought a sandwich, and eventually found himself caught up in the commotion outside the TSBD and the Dal-Tex building.
Like Florer, Bradiing apparently went into the Dal-Tex building in search of a phone. If Brading's account is truthful, he took a freight elevator up to the third floor of the Dal-Tex, where he found a woman trying to use a pay phone, which was apparently the only pay phone in the vicinity. The woman told him that the phone was out of order. Brading then got back in the elevator and returned to the ground floor, where the elevator operator pointed him out to a uniformed policeman as a stranger in the building.
He claimed that all of this occurred around half an hour after he had seen the motorcade further along Elm Street, and that he was present when what looked like a rifle was taken out of the book depository. That happened at about 2.30, at least an hour and a half after Brading would have come to the attention of Deputy Sheriff Lewis, who presumably wouldn't have waited an hour and a half before escorting a potential suspect from the scene of the crime. I don't suppose it's possible to reconstruct Lewis's movements to see if they confirm or deny anything in Brading's account (see p.50 onwards of Braden's HSCA interview for his account of being inside the Dal-Tex: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19906#relPageId=50).
Regarding a possible encounter between Baker and an employee on the third floor of the Dal-Tex, it's curious that at least two non-employees found themselves on the third floor. Also curious is the fact that one of these non-employees had a criminal record and gave the authorities a false name and a ready-made story that got him released from questioning.
It would be interesting to know if there are any photos or home movies that show identifiable individuals going into or out of the Dal-Tex building after the assassination. I'm not aware of any. There's more than one photo floating around of Larry Florer in the vicinity of the Dal-Tex building, but I don't think it shows much background detail. Photos of Brading in the area might confirm or contradict the timetable he gave.
BRADING WAS IN PICS IN PLAZA AFTER SHOOTING LISTENING TO CHARLES BREHM
It would also be interesting to know whether the Dal-Tex building actually contained any pay phones. A woman who worked there apparently told Florer that there weren't any, but Brading claimed there was one on the third floor. I'd be inclined to believe the woman who actually worked on the third floor of the building, assuming that she did and wasn't referring to the Criminal Courts building.
YES PAY PHONE THIRD FLOOR PER SHARPER
Ed
- JFK_Case
- Posts : 233
Join date : 2019-02-13
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Wed 08 Jun 2022, 6:20 am
From Accessories After the Fact. I'm interested in the very last sentence of the footnote below.
Sylvia M. seems to think Baker and Truly were there and if you read the book, she also seems to think there's a conflict with their statements and the Adams girl - one or the other can't both be right. Personally, I think it could all have happened and it still doesn't the change the fact that Oswald could have pulled it off like they said.
Sylvia M. seems to think Baker and Truly were there and if you read the book, she also seems to think there's a conflict with their statements and the Adams girl - one or the other can't both be right. Personally, I think it could all have happened and it still doesn't the change the fact that Oswald could have pulled it off like they said.
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Wed 08 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Sure and monkeys flew over the TSBD and Baker was just mistaken.
Cheers
Ed
Cheers
Ed
- Mick_Purdy
- Posts : 2426
Join date : 2013-07-26
Location : Melbourne Australia
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Wed 08 Jun 2022, 9:46 am
My take is that the Police, FBI, SS had to place him on the second. I know it's been said many times before but anywhere would do -anywhere but the first floor or worse just outside the building would suffice. No way he makes it down to the first floor or just outside after those shots.
_________________
I'm just a patsy!
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Wed 08 Jun 2022, 1:09 pm
FFS. Enough, Michael!JFK_Case wrote:From Accessories After the Fact. I'm interested in the very last sentence of the footnote below.
Sylvia M. seems to think Baker and Truly were there and if you read the book, she also seems to think there's a conflict with their statements and the Adams girl - one or the other can't both be right. Personally, I think it could all have happened and it still doesn't the change the fact that Oswald could have pulled it off like they said.
I have explained that bullshit already.
The handwriting is NOT Baker's. The handwriting was done by the FBI agent who took the statement.
If law enforcement suspects someone is not being truthful, they deliberately insert small errors into the statement. The witness or suspect is then asked to read the statement, make any corrections, initial then, and then sign it at the bottom. This is part of the Reid Technique. The theory is that a liar will not pick up on the small errors and just sign it. Baker did notice the errors -- but only because he was by then, so well rehearsed. In fact, it may have been a test to make sure he knew his script for the WC.
Like I said, you are entitled to hang on to whatever parts of the official fairy tale that help float your boat, but you are arguing against someone who has been studying this one aspect of the case inside and out for at least 20 years - and continuing to argue only by ignoring things that have been explained multiple times - like this Baker FBI statement.
I have the utmost respect for Meagher... but she, like everyone else, just accepted the story uncritically and tried to get around it with the bullshit timing aspect.
Here is some of my very earliest work on it
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.assassination.jfk/c/IjGQfgzWlEk/m/ti5o9RYz7IQJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.assassination.jfk/c/XpuBh4iXkB0/m/sHGYjvCknmQJ
Note that in this 2004 post, I was aware of Hosty's notes, but had no copy of them. Note also that this is well before PM - which later moved things along considerably. In those early days, it was still very much a work in progress, but as I said back then, still much closer to the facts than the official version.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.assassination.jfk/c/_h86gJ_GyEE/m/q7k-RhOfeEYJ
If you are going to keep arguing - fine - but please do so by addressing the evidence presented to you and not pulling a Lone Nutter by ignoring said evidence and just repeating your own emotional attachments to the fairy tale,
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Wed 08 Jun 2022, 8:54 pm
He won't listen to the simplest advice given. Reminds me of that other clown....ah yes!
_________________
Prayer Man: More Than a Fuzzy Picture (E-)Book @ Amazon.
Prayer-Man.com
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Fri 10 Jun 2022, 5:50 am
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Fri 10 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm
Jeremy, BP was quite possibly the first to call this from eyeballing the film.JeremyBojczuk wrote:It's good to have a collection of those witness statements that specifically mentioned not seeing a policeman enter the front of the building with Truly.
I recall Robert Prudhomme pointing out (here or at the Ed Forum, or both) that Baker seems to be running right past the entrance and towards the Dal-Tex building. Was Prudhomme the first person to spot this? If so, he made a valuable contribution. I remember there was criticism of his gun-related interests; if that's why he's no longer active, it's a shame.
It's probably a few decades too late to look into who might have seen Baker enter the Dal-Tex, if that's where he ended up, or who might have witnessed his presence inside the building, if his encounter with a man on a third or fourth floor took place there rather than in the book depository.
The Dal-Tex building has received remarkably little attention from the authorities and from critics, given that it had more than its fair share of suspicious activity. We know of three people who were taken into police custody from the building:
1 - William Sharp, "who the officers said had been up in the building across the street from the book depository without a good reason," according to J.B. Leavelle, who took him into custody (WC Hearings and Exhibits, vol.20, p.499: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1137#relPageId=519). No statement seems to have been taken from Sharp.
2 - Larry Florer was apparently looking for a phone and was directed to the third floor. He was taken into custody by Officer W.H. Denham, made a statement, and was released (see WCHE, vol.19, p.476 [https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1136#relPageId=494] for Florer's statement and p.517 for Denham). Florer's statement is slightly ambiguous, claiming that he was told about a pay phone in the County Records building, but that he was directed instead to "a lot of phones on the third floor of this building that I was standing in front of" by a woman who worked on the third floor of that building. Richard Trask (Pictures of the Pain, p.547) interprets this to mean that Florer went into the County Records building, but the implication (to me, at least) is that Florer went into a different building, which must have been the Dal-Tex.
3 - Eugene Brading, aka Jim Braden, also claimed to have been on the third floor, looking for a phone. After descending to the ground floor, he was taken into custody by Deputy Sheriff C.L. Lewis, but was released after giving a false name and a nothing-to-see-here statement (CE 2003, p.12 [WCHE, vol.24, p.202]: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1140#relPageId=220).
Brading's links to the mafia might have been what brought him to the attention of the HSCA, who questioned him (the transcript has no official designation: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19906). Brading also made a deposition which covered much of the same ground, but in less detail (NARA Record Number 180-10103-1037: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19907). Brading claimed that he was nowhere near the Dal-Tex building during the assassination, but his account has inconsistencies and, as far as I'm aware, no corroboration.
He claimed to have watched the motorcade from the opposite side of the road from the Titche-Goettinger department store, which was at 1901 Elm Street.* After the motorcade had passed, he walked a block or two to the Federal Building to meet his probation officer, and spent around 15 minutes there. He then walked down the street, bought a sandwich, and eventually found himself caught up in the commotion outside the TSBD and the Dal-Tex building.
Like Florer, Bradiing apparently went into the Dal-Tex building in search of a phone. If Brading's account is truthful, he took a freight elevator up to the third floor of the Dal-Tex, where he found a woman trying to use a pay phone, which was apparently the only pay phone in the vicinity. The woman told him that the phone was out of order. Brading then got back in the elevator and returned to the ground floor, where the elevator operator pointed him out to a uniformed policeman as a stranger in the building.
He claimed that all of this occurred around half an hour after he had seen the motorcade further along Elm Street, and that he was present when what looked like a rifle was taken out of the book depository. That happened at about 2.30, at least an hour and a half after Brading would have come to the attention of Deputy Sheriff Lewis, who presumably wouldn't have waited an hour and a half before escorting a potential suspect from the scene of the crime. I don't suppose it's possible to reconstruct Lewis's movements to see if they confirm or deny anything in Brading's account (see p.50 onwards of Braden's HSCA interview for his account of being inside the Dal-Tex: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19906#relPageId=50).
Regarding a possible encounter between Baker and an employee on the third floor of the Dal-Tex, it's curious that at least two non-employees found themselves on the third floor. Also curious is the fact that one of these non-employees had a criminal record and gave the authorities a false name and a ready-made story that got him released from questioning.
It would be interesting to know if there are any photos or home movies that show identifiable individuals going into or out of the Dal-Tex building after the assassination. I'm not aware of any. There's more than one photo floating around of Larry Florer in the vicinity of the Dal-Tex building, but I don't think it shows much background detail. Photos of Brading in the area might confirm or contradict the timetable he gave.
It would also be interesting to know whether the Dal-Tex building actually contained any pay phones. A woman who worked there apparently told Florer that there weren't any, but Brading claimed there was one on the third floor. I'd be inclined to believe the woman who actually worked on the third floor of the building, assuming that she did and wasn't referring to the Criminal Courts building.
--
* When looking up the address of the department store (http://www.thedepartmentstoremuseum.org/2010/06/titche-goettinger-co-dallas.html), I discovered that there is or was a W.C. Stripling department store in Fort Worth. Two Striplings! Both of them in Fort Worth! That means they're doppelgangers!
Yes, we were critical of his self-proclaimed gun expertise. It was part of what made him a walking, talking stereotype. Don't you worry about Bob. He kept me busy for quite a while, hitting the complaint button daily. Toward the end though, there was a thaw in relations - maybe because of this Baker observation or maybe because he came to realize there was no real malice in anything said. He may have even began to embrace the banter. So no, I don't think we chased him off. That would be an insult to Bob's fortitude and rugged frontier individualism.
It was certainly why I started looking at the witness statements.
As for Sharp/Sharper
I originally thought that Leavelle confused Braden's name for Sharper's name, just getting it (Sharper's name) slightly wrong... but if Leavelle has Sharper's address when he made his memo, he would also have his name, so Braden being misremembered as Sharper, but transformed to Sharp with Sharper's address, makes no fricking sense. Just to complicate things even more, there was a letter sent between 2 researchers in the 1990s where one informs the other that there were three arrests in the Dal-Tex - the third being SHARPER - not SHARP as claimed by the WC. Moreover, the letter claims that SHARPER was a FORMER employee of one of the Jaffe brothers on the third floor.
I have let this area float around anong all the other shit the back of my mind for a long while and coming back to it now, I think it has legs.
Leavelle's claim that Sharp/Sharper was arrested may well be true because we have a story of a "janitor" being held in custody by Special Services who witnessed the shooter firing and would appear before the WC as a bombshell witness.
The story was given to Waldo Thayer by the Hoaward brothers - one a deputy sheriff, the other in the Secret Service.
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1141#relPageId=877
The Howard brothers would later claim they just having a bit of fun with Waldo and didn't know he was a reporter, while Citizen Lane claimed they had deliberately planted a false story in the media via Thayer.
Elements of the story point to Eddie Piper. He resembled the "elderly Negro" described by Rowland and was the only janitor in the building.
On the other hand, it sounds like Williams since Williams BELATEDLY claimed to eat lunch on the 6th and also BELATELY claim to hide behiind boxes ON THE 5TH FLOOR.
But Williams was taken in by DPD. We have the photographic proof.
Piper does say he ran at the sound of the first shot up to join Troy West but perhaps tellingly, claims he looked at the clock on the wall and it was 12:25. Funnily enough, this was when the parade was due to pass - NOT when it DID pass. Piper than changed this to 12:27 to 12:30 in his testimony. The original timing brings his story into question - especially when you add in that he claimed to have an interaction with Oswald at the start of the lunch break that makes it sound like they were on an upper floor. There were also early reports of a "porter" escorting" Oswald up to the 6th floor. Why the fuck would Oswald need "escorting" up? He wouldn't. But one or more strangers in the Dal-Tex DID get escorted up by the lift operator, William Sharper.
In any case, it has been verified that unlike the person allegedly held, Piper had no previous legal issues.
All muddying the waters to cover up who it really was?
And by one account at least, the lift operator at the Dal-Tex raced outside to alert police about the stranger in the building.
Did Sharper have a record for craps? Did he see something inside the Dal-Tex he wasn't supposed to see? Was he held in "protective custody" until they had organized for parts of the story to be shifted to Piper and Williams in the TSBD?
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Fri 10 Jun 2022, 1:08 pm
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Fri 10 Jun 2022, 4:40 pm
greg_parker wrote:Jeremy, BP was quite possibly the first to call this from eyeballing the film.
Yes, we were critical of his self-proclaimed gun expertise. It was part of what made him a walking, talking stereotype. Don't you worry about Bob. He kept me busy for quite a while, hitting the complaint button daily. Toward the end though, there was a thaw in relations - maybe because of this Baker observation or maybe because he came to realize there was no real malice in anything said. He may have even began to embrace the banter. So no, I don't think we chased him off. That would be an insult to Bob's fortitude and rugged frontier individualism.
It was certainly why I started looking at the witness statements.
Bob P was opinionated and could rub people the wrong way. Like a lot of us, I suppose.
Bob became hostile, primarily to Greg—and by extension ROKC—when Greg began posting over at Deep Politics Forum in order to directly challenge tenets of the Harvey & Lee doctrine. The H&L faithful ganged up on him and Bob joined in. They never refuted anything Greg had to say and in short order, Greg was shouted down and banned.
Around this time we came up with nicknames for many of them, including Fez, Vacant Lot, Very Busy Lawyer, Bumfuck Bob (Bob with the antlers), and I made a lot of memes and comic strips lampooning the wacky beliefs and utterances of these people. This was all in response to the harsh treatment and comments we received on a regular basis. Even today, we refer to the Deep Politics Forum as Deep Foo Foo.
Here's a sample of the comic strips I ran at the time:
Right around the time Greg was banned, I recall Bob actually reposting some of the comic strips at Deep Foo Foo, admitting they were funny, so he had a sense of humor. Bob promptly got his ass chewed out by the Foo Foo mods and the stuff was purged and that was it.
I agree with Greg. I think Bob realized there was no real malice in what we ever said. He's not the kind of guy somebody runs off. I think over time this business can wear one down. Hell, if I had the energy, vitality, and the (steely dan inspired) creativity I once had, I'd be doing a lot more myself. ROKCers like Greg and others that stay with it have my utmost admiration.
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Fri 10 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
greg_parker. wrote:
As for Sharp/Sharper
I originally thought that Leavelle confused Braden's name for Sharper's name, just getting it (Sharper's name) slightly wrong... but if Leavelle has Sharper's address when he made his memo, he would also have his name, so Braden being misremembered as Sharper, but transformed to Sharp with Sharper's address, makes no fricking sense. Just to complicate things even more, there was a letter sent between 2 researchers in the 1990s where one informs the other that there were three arrests in the Dal-Tex - the third being SHARPER - not SHARP as claimed by the WC. Moreover, the letter claims that SHARPER was a FORMER employee of one of the Jaffe brothers on the third floor.
I have let this area float around anong all the other shit the back of my mind for a long while and coming back to it now, I think it has legs.
Leavelle's claim that Sharp/Sharper was arrested may well be true because we have a story of a "janitor" being held in custody by Special Services who witnessed the shooter firing and would appear before the WC as a bombshell witness.
The story was given to Waldo Thayer by the Hoaward brothers - one a deputy sheriff, the other in the Secret Service.
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1141#relPageId=877
The Howard brothers would later claim they just having a bit of fun with Waldo and didn't know he was a reporter, while Citizen Lane claimed they had deliberately planted a false story in the media via Thayer.
Elements of the story point to Eddie Piper. He resembled the "elderly Negro" described by Rowland and was the only janitor in the building.
On the other hand, it sounds like Williams since Williams BELATEDLY claimed to eat lunch on the 6th and also BELATELY claim to hide behiind boxes ON THE 5TH FLOOR.
But Williams was taken in by DPD. We have the photographic proof.
Piper does say he ran at the sound of the first shot up to join Troy West but perhaps tellingly, claims he looked at the clock on the wall and it was 12:25. Funnily enough, this was when the parade was due to pass - NOT when it DID pass. Piper than changed this to 12:27 to 12:30 in his testimony. The original timing brings his story into question - especially when you add in that he claimed to have an interaction with Oswald at the start of the lunch break that makes it sound like they were on an upper floor. There were also early reports of a "porter" escorting" Oswald up to the 6th floor. Why the fuck would Oswald need "escorting" up? He wouldn't. But one or more strangers in the Dal-Tex DID get escorted up by the lift operator, William Sharper.
In any case, it has been verified that unlike the person allegedly held, Piper had no previous legal issues.
All muddying the waters to cover up who it really was?
And by one account at least, the lift operator at the Dal-Tex raced outside to alert police about the stranger in the building.
Did Sharper have a record for craps? Did he see something inside the Dal-Tex he wasn't supposed to see? Was he held in "protective custody" until they had organized for parts of the story to be shifted to Piper and Williams in the TSBD?
https://youtu.be/1EJrWI0hSLM
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Fri 10 Jun 2022, 7:57 pm
greg_parker wrote:Jeremy, BP was quite possibly the first to call this from eyeballing the film.JeremyBojczuk wrote:It's good to have a collection of those witness statements that specifically mentioned not seeing a policeman enter the front of the building with Truly.
I recall Robert Prudhomme pointing out (here or at the Ed Forum, or both) that Baker seems to be running right past the entrance and towards the Dal-Tex building. Was Prudhomme the first person to spot this? If so, he made a valuable contribution. I remember there was criticism of his gun-related interests; if that's why he's no longer active, it's a shame.
It's probably a few decades too late to look into who might have seen Baker enter the Dal-Tex, if that's where he ended up, or who might have witnessed his presence inside the building, if his encounter with a man on a third or fourth floor took place there rather than in the book depository.
The Dal-Tex building has received remarkably little attention from the authorities and from critics, given that it had more than its fair share of suspicious activity. We know of three people who were taken into police custody from the building:
1 - William Sharp, "who the officers said had been up in the building across the street from the book depository without a good reason," according to J.B. Leavelle, who took him into custody (WC Hearings and Exhibits, vol.20, p.499: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1137#relPageId=519). No statement seems to have been taken from Sharp.
2 - Larry Florer was apparently looking for a phone and was directed to the third floor. He was taken into custody by Officer W.H. Denham, made a statement, and was released (see WCHE, vol.19, p.476 [https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1136#relPageId=494] for Florer's statement and p.517 for Denham). Florer's statement is slightly ambiguous, claiming that he was told about a pay phone in the County Records building, but that he was directed instead to "a lot of phones on the third floor of this building that I was standing in front of" by a woman who worked on the third floor of that building. Richard Trask (Pictures of the Pain, p.547) interprets this to mean that Florer went into the County Records building, but the implication (to me, at least) is that Florer went into a different building, which must have been the Dal-Tex.
3 - Eugene Brading, aka Jim Braden, also claimed to have been on the third floor, looking for a phone. After descending to the ground floor, he was taken into custody by Deputy Sheriff C.L. Lewis, but was released after giving a false name and a nothing-to-see-here statement (CE 2003, p.12 [WCHE, vol.24, p.202]: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1140#relPageId=220).
Brading's links to the mafia might have been what brought him to the attention of the HSCA, who questioned him (the transcript has no official designation: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19906). Brading also made a deposition which covered much of the same ground, but in less detail (NARA Record Number 180-10103-1037: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19907). Brading claimed that he was nowhere near the Dal-Tex building during the assassination, but his account has inconsistencies and, as far as I'm aware, no corroboration.
He claimed to have watched the motorcade from the opposite side of the road from the Titche-Goettinger department store, which was at 1901 Elm Street.* After the motorcade had passed, he walked a block or two to the Federal Building to meet his probation officer, and spent around 15 minutes there. He then walked down the street, bought a sandwich, and eventually found himself caught up in the commotion outside the TSBD and the Dal-Tex building.
Like Florer, Bradiing apparently went into the Dal-Tex building in search of a phone. If Brading's account is truthful, he took a freight elevator up to the third floor of the Dal-Tex, where he found a woman trying to use a pay phone, which was apparently the only pay phone in the vicinity. The woman told him that the phone was out of order. Brading then got back in the elevator and returned to the ground floor, where the elevator operator pointed him out to a uniformed policeman as a stranger in the building.
He claimed that all of this occurred around half an hour after he had seen the motorcade further along Elm Street, and that he was present when what looked like a rifle was taken out of the book depository. That happened at about 2.30, at least an hour and a half after Brading would have come to the attention of Deputy Sheriff Lewis, who presumably wouldn't have waited an hour and a half before escorting a potential suspect from the scene of the crime. I don't suppose it's possible to reconstruct Lewis's movements to see if they confirm or deny anything in Brading's account (see p.50 onwards of Braden's HSCA interview for his account of being inside the Dal-Tex: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=19906#relPageId=50).
Regarding a possible encounter between Baker and an employee on the third floor of the Dal-Tex, it's curious that at least two non-employees found themselves on the third floor. Also curious is the fact that one of these non-employees had a criminal record and gave the authorities a false name and a ready-made story that got him released from questioning.
It would be interesting to know if there are any photos or home movies that show identifiable individuals going into or out of the Dal-Tex building after the assassination. I'm not aware of any. There's more than one photo floating around of Larry Florer in the vicinity of the Dal-Tex building, but I don't think it shows much background detail. Photos of Brading in the area might confirm or contradict the timetable he gave.
It would also be interesting to know whether the Dal-Tex building actually contained any pay phones. A woman who worked there apparently told Florer that there weren't any, but Brading claimed there was one on the third floor. I'd be inclined to believe the woman who actually worked on the third floor of the building, assuming that she did and wasn't referring to the Criminal Courts building.
--
* When looking up the address of the department store (http://www.thedepartmentstoremuseum.org/2010/06/titche-goettinger-co-dallas.html), I discovered that there is or was a W.C. Stripling department store in Fort Worth. Two Striplings! Both of them in Fort Worth! That means they're doppelgangers!
Yes, we were critical of his self-proclaimed gun expertise. It was part of what made him a walking, talking stereotype. Don't you worry about Bob. He kept me busy for quite a while, hitting the complaint button daily. Toward the end though, there was a thaw in relations - maybe because of this Baker observation or maybe because he came to realize there was no real malice in anything said. He may have even began to embrace the banter. So no, I don't think we chased him off. That would be an insult to Bob's fortitude and rugged frontier individualism.
It was certainly why I started looking at the witness statements.
As for Sharp/Sharper
I originally thought that Leavelle confused Braden's name for Sharper's name, just getting it (Sharper's name) slightly wrong... but if Leavelle has Sharper's address when he made his memo, he would also have his name, so Braden being misremembered as Sharper, but transformed to Sharp with Sharper's address, makes no fricking sense. Just to complicate things even more, there was a letter sent between 2 researchers in the 1990s where one informs the other that there were three arrests in the Dal-Tex - the third being SHARPER - not SHARP as claimed by the WC. Moreover, the letter claims that SHARPER was a FORMER employee of one of the Jaffe brothers on the third floor.
I have let this area float around anong all the other shit the back of my mind for a long while and coming back to it now, I think it has legs.
Leavelle's claim that Sharp/Sharper was arrested may well be true because we have a story of a "janitor" being held in custody by Special Services who witnessed the shooter firing and would appear before the WC as a bombshell witness.
The story was given to Waldo Thayer by the Hoaward brothers - one a deputy sheriff, the other in the Secret Service.
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1141#relPageId=877
The Howard brothers would later claim they just having a bit of fun with Waldo and didn't know he was a reporter, while Citizen Lane claimed they had deliberately planted a false story in the media via Thayer.
Elements of the story point to Eddie Piper. He resembled the "elderly Negro" described by Rowland and was the only janitor in the building.
On the other hand, it sounds like Williams since Williams BELATEDLY claimed to eat lunch on the 6th and also BELATELY claim to hide behiind boxes ON THE 5TH FLOOR.
But Williams was taken in by DPD. We have the photographic proof.
Piper does say he ran at the sound of the first shot up to join Troy West but perhaps tellingly, claims he looked at the clock on the wall and it was 12:25. Funnily enough, this was when the parade was due to pass - NOT when it DID pass. Piper than changed this to 12:27 to 12:30 in his testimony. The original timing brings his story into question - especially when you add in that he claimed to have an interaction with Oswald at the start of the lunch break that makes it sound like they were on an upper floor. There were also early reports of a "porter" escorting" Oswald up to the 6th floor. Why the fuck would Oswald need "escorting" up? He wouldn't. But one or more strangers in the Dal-Tex DID get escorted up by the lift operator, William Sharper.
In any case, it has been verified that unlike the person allegedly held, Piper had no previous legal issues.
All muddying the waters to cover up who it really was?
And by one account at least, the lift operator at the Dal-Tex raced outside to alert police about the stranger in the building.
Did Sharper have a record for craps? Did he see something inside the Dal-Tex he wasn't supposed to see? Was he held in "protective custody" until they had organized for parts of the story to be shifted to Piper and Williams in the TSBD?
Piper had a DUI in the 50's.
These days that would be waved off, but in 1960s Dallas and being black I am not too sure of that happening then.
_________________
Prayer Man: More Than a Fuzzy Picture (E-)Book @ Amazon.
Prayer-Man.com
- Ed.Ledoux
- Posts : 3360
Join date : 2012-01-04
Re: Oswald's alibi - yet another look
Sat 11 Jun 2022, 8:58 am
Just seeing his fine at nearly double that of the other six is interesting. Maximum?
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum