Rushoman to Judgement

First topic message reminder :

Some Albert Doyle DPF quotes from his defense of Ralph Yates

Yates rushed in to work to tell Jones of his picking-up a hitch-hiker who discussed shooting Kennedy from an office building with a high powered rifle (sound familiar?) during his motorcade. Yates rushed in to tell Jones this because it was a curious coincidence with their previous conversation about it being possible to shoot Kennedy on his visit. I don't think those researchers are quoting accurately either because I believe Yates mentioned to Jones that the man was carrying a package. Or do they think Yates rushed-in to work to tell Jones he picked-up an ordinary hitch-hiker?

I think what saves Yates is the fact he rushed back to tell Jones because the experience was freakishly similar to what they were discussing. I can't understand people who takes sides against a man who endured sanitarium persecution in order to stick to his story as well as passing a lie detector test. Yates contacting FBI in order to push a silly hoax that would only get him in serious trouble if exposed doesn't make sense. Funny how Yates had no signs at all of those alleged serious mental problems during his employment until he came forward with his story and refused to back-down.

If Yates just picked up an ordinary hitch-hiker why did he rush-in to tell Jones?

https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?11329-Ralph-Yates

Clearly Doyle's defense places a lot of emphasis on this "rushing to tell".

Can someone point me to the document that mentions all this "rushing"?

My good friend, Bill Kelly at the ed forum accurately cites other cases where psychiatric institutions have been used to shut witnesses up and/or destroy their credibility. Bill also rightly pointed out that both Armstrong and Douglas should have been more critical because Yates' story does not hold together.

The point is that just because psychiatry has been misused to silence some, it does not follow that all people accused of having mental problems are likewise simply being silenced. As in all aspects of this case, each piece of evidence needs to be evaluated on its own merits - and without doubt, a part of that is bearing in mind the misdeeds of the DPD and the FBI, but Lee has covered all bases in his assessment, and until someone comes up with further evidence, his work on Yates stands as the benchmark.

To be perfectly frank, I also have a short fuse for people who don't engage their brain before they post. This includes people who think it's a good idea to insult the forum owner (and others) by writing the following utter crap:


"The lunacy in me is in taking on the cult, the true believers, those who don't think the lunchroom incident ever happened. Because those true believers are the true lunatics, who can't accept concrete evidence that their hypothesis is incorrect, even with that evidence is dropped at their feet and thoroughly explained to them"


Now who the fuck wrote that?

Richard Gilbride wrote:A complete and utter ******* from your hometown once said the Beatles were more popular than Jesus Christ. People in Texas burned Beatles records as a result. And when asked to explain himself, he said he never said they were better than Christ. The problem was that they had become more popular.

Similarly, when I say Walt Brown doesn't have a science degree, no way I intend that as an insult or that I'm better than him. It gets construed as arrogance I think because I have a short fuse for people who don't engage their brain before they post. Which was my major complaint with Walt. I don't think I could find a single further complaint in the whole body of his work.

A free-spirited free thinking poet who inspired - and gave a voice to - a generation with his acerbic wit, his brutal honesty and his lucid visions of a new world, a world void of religious bigotry, exploitation and flag-waving hypocrisy. A man who preached love and peace, who actively campaigned against war (including those who profit from it) and is almost universally respected as one of the finest songwriters of the 20th century.

A complete and utter what? Surely not a profanity Richard...?

I don't trust people who don't like animals: and I don't trust people who don't like the Beatles

So some folk in Dallas burned all their records; no surprises there. That's what they do in Dallas when confronted with the truth - they start burning/shredding records!

bernie laverick wrote:A complete and utter what? Surely not a profanity Richard...?

And after insulting people, he then smugly expects that they show him respect. What a crock of shit!

bump for Ralph Yates' fans