- Frankie Vegas
- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-11-09
Age : 41
Location : New Zealand
For interest sake
Sun 23 Jun 2013, 12:41 am
http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/dallas/Lee-Harvey-Oswald-found-not-guilty-in-mock-trial-212564441.html
DALLAS -- A jury couldn't come to a unanimous verdict Friday afternoon in the mock trial of the man labeled as President John F. Kennedy's assassin, in an exercise organized and produced by the State Bar of Texas.
I must admit I am really surprised at this.
DALLAS -- A jury couldn't come to a unanimous verdict Friday afternoon in the mock trial of the man labeled as President John F. Kennedy's assassin, in an exercise organized and produced by the State Bar of Texas.
I must admit I am really surprised at this.
- Martin Hay
- Posts : 217
Join date : 2013-06-22
Re: For interest sake
Sun 23 Jun 2013, 5:03 am
Me too. It's not as if they even used the actual witnesses, just actors.
I saw an interview with the "prosecutor". She said the problem was that jury members had gone into it already having their own ideas what happened. She also said they would "try" him again.
I saw an interview with the "prosecutor". She said the problem was that jury members had gone into it already having their own ideas what happened. She also said they would "try" him again.
Re: For interest sake
Sun 23 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Apparently the trial lasted all of 3 hours and consisted of only the prosecution presenting the rifle purchase and ballistics as its case and the defence relying solely on GK witnesses for a conspiracy case.
I would say that is a very good definition of a "mock" trial.
I would say that is a very good definition of a "mock" trial.
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
Re: For interest sake
Sun 23 Jun 2013, 8:24 am
I agree, Greg. Perhaps they could have addressed the 15 simple questions I asked Gary Mack on my blog, since Mack never did.
- Frankie Vegas
- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-11-09
Age : 41
Location : New Zealand
Re: For interest sake
Sun 23 Jun 2013, 10:32 am
Even still, shoddy mock trial that it is. DVP is having a tanty in the comments section. Trying to make sure everyone who reads the story thinks that this would have never happened in real life.
Although I agree with him partly, you have to wonder at that guys motivation. And stamina.
Although I agree with him partly, you have to wonder at that guys motivation. And stamina.
Re: For interest sake
Sat 16 Aug 2014, 9:26 am
Anyone know if this new "trial" is ever going to take place? Even in the past year, there is a whole slew of new info I'd love to see get thrown into the mix of even just a "mock" trial.Martin Hay wrote:Me too. It's not as if they even used the actual witnesses, just actors.
I saw an interview with the "prosecutor". She said the problem was that jury members had gone into it already having their own ideas what happened. She also said they would "try" him again.
_________________
Australians don't mind criminals: It's successful bullshit artists we despise.
Lachie Hulme
-----------------------------
The Cold War ran on bullshit.
Me
"So what’s an independent-minded populist like me to do? I’ve had to grovel in promoting myself on social media, even begging for Amazon reviews and Goodreads ratings, to no avail." Don Jeffries
"I've been aware of Greg Parker's work for years, and strongly recommend it." Peter Dale Scott
https://gregrparker.com
- M.Ellis
- Posts : 45
Join date : 2014-07-17
Re: For interest sake
Sat 16 Aug 2014, 12:07 pm
IMO, it's not such a bad result. Defense attorneys should be reasonably pleased. The prosecution failed to convict their client.
Of course, LHO could never be allowed to go to trial. Whoever set him up must have been sweating bullets when the DPD took him into custody. If LHO had been allowed to consult even a half-awake lawyer, the whole scenario could start to unravel.
544 Camp Street, Mexico City, the rifle, the pistol, the autopsy, the missing brain, and the lack of any motive on LHO's part to shoot JFK. These would have caused huge headaches for prosecutors. To get a unanimous conviction, the judge would have to be bought. And the jury would have to be put in fear for their lives.
LBJ could do that, but even so, there would be trial transcripts on paper - for the appeal and later for historians to dig through. So LHO had to be whacked. Vincent Salandria was right. If he didn't survive the week-end, it was a coup d'etat.
Hasan, I read your blog. Questions 2,3,11,12, 14 are interesting to me. I didn't know Arcacha-Smith had a street map of Dealey Plaza sewers.
Of course, LHO could never be allowed to go to trial. Whoever set him up must have been sweating bullets when the DPD took him into custody. If LHO had been allowed to consult even a half-awake lawyer, the whole scenario could start to unravel.
544 Camp Street, Mexico City, the rifle, the pistol, the autopsy, the missing brain, and the lack of any motive on LHO's part to shoot JFK. These would have caused huge headaches for prosecutors. To get a unanimous conviction, the judge would have to be bought. And the jury would have to be put in fear for their lives.
LBJ could do that, but even so, there would be trial transcripts on paper - for the appeal and later for historians to dig through. So LHO had to be whacked. Vincent Salandria was right. If he didn't survive the week-end, it was a coup d'etat.
Hasan, I read your blog. Questions 2,3,11,12, 14 are interesting to me. I didn't know Arcacha-Smith had a street map of Dealey Plaza sewers.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum