(Un) Altered film proves Sandy is simple

First topic message reminder :

Professor Larsen's 1st rule of  Alterationism  - If you are determined not to prove anything you can make up any old shite and call it  " proof"

William of ROKCams*  Tinny  " What appears anomalous to the untrained eye is usually perfectly  explicable to the trained eye" 

To paraphrase  the  Immortal  William  Blake  " If a fool persists in mistaking his folly for wisdom he will remain a fool. For merely believing that folly is wisdom does not make the believer wise"

After his attempt to  " prove" the so called  Magical Money  Order was fake( and  persisting with his erroneous claim despite a series of comical blunders), after his triumphant foray into the  highly specialised world of military dentistry and forensic orthodontics ( after spending a mere 3 weeks " studying" the subjects he felt sufficiently  emboldened to dismiss the professional opinions of 3 experts with decades worth of experience) to " prove" that  the  elusive  LEE Oswald  was  missing a tooth ( or was it  teeth?) ended in humiliation and mutual recrimination. Not to mention the  discovery of the  obvious enhancement of a  key piece of " evidence ", namely a blatant attempt at forgery , a clearly visible  black marker line  ,which  bleeds onto the lower lip, obscuring the front tooth  LEE Oswald  supposedly  lost . ( something , incidentally, none of these courageous  troof  seekers have  had the guts to  comment upon,  let alone apologies for misleading their fellow  " researchers ")And  after his  magisterial  display  in the  " Stripling " debate, not to mention  numerous condescending,  patronising  remarks , his stubbornness,  arrogance and  clumsy attempts at feigning an air of superiority ( predicated upon his claims of a near genius level  IQ) the erudite  Professor Larsen once again descends from the  lofty heights of his self regard  , to  share the  bountiful  fruits of his soaring intellect..

Along with his fellow  sage ( although some would argue he is more of an overstuffed  turkey), John Butler,  the man who has single handedly transformed  ignorance into an Olympic  sport,  the venerable  Professor has decided to prove,  once and for all,  that the  Zapruder film is fake..

With one luminous  spurt he will put an end to almost  30 years ,of sometimes  bitter,  internecine  turmoil 

How did he prove these anomalies ( so called  selective blurring) were contrary to the laws of physics ? A series of groundbreaking  equations? Utilising his profound knowledge of 1960s photographic/ film making  technology? Carefully  demonstrating,  via exhaustive  analysis and practical research,  how  these anomalies couldn't be the result of other, non suspicious  occurrences  ( copying  etc)???

Don't be fucking ridiculous...are you some kind of lone nutist? Or are you simply  too dumb to understand the  venerable  Professor's  transcendent  brilliance?

He simply  said so. Assertion equals proof to these Alice in  Wonderlands of  troof..

Anything can mean nothing and nothing practically anything. 

You see Professor Larsen is too smart to bother with such trifling  details!

By merely stating something  contradicts the laws of physics then the anomalies in question contradict the aforementioned  laws...its not the Professor's fault if you are too dense to grasp his subtle  genius..

The Zapruder film is fake because  Professor  SANDY LARSEN says so.

Likewise  his illustrious  colleague, Academician Butler  doesn't have to prove a single word he says. 

No sirree 

He is free to make up the wildest most illogical shite imaginable,  making all sorts of fantastical  claims...its up to the  lone nutists to disprove the arguments he hasn't made..

Why should  Professor Larsen  demean  himself? He's a bonafide  genius  doncha know!, if he says the film is fake  then it's fake. He doesn't have to waste his precious time trying to explain it to the  ignorati,  who are probably too dumb to understand it anyway..

I find the whole subject of alterationism  self destructive,  self  defeating and utterly pointless. That's not  fair.  The  subject itself is by no means  ridiculous,  and  almost certainly some  evidence was altered ( the  BYP in particular)

Rather its what passes,  or rather,  what is passed off as " proof" by some of these individuals..THAT'S  what I find almost embarrassingly  ridiculous. 

The ignorance is almost matched by the  arrogance. The condescension,   or the  almost  comical  attemps to sound condescending , a regressive approach  combined with an almost manic stubbornness and an absolute refusal even to countenance  error.

Sandy Larsen has proved the Z film is fake,  just as John Butler has proved that the  Moorman  Polaroid was altered in less than  2 and a half hours, and  Phil Willis had an amazing  extra long leg...and JFK sat waving and smiling after being shot at least once in the head and back..

If you disagree  you're obviously a lone nutist,  or propagandist or else you are too dumb to understand. 

And if you  dare to  complain about the  mistruths,  the misrepresentations,  the insinuations and  attempted slurs well those courageous  troof seekers and  fucking  hypocrites  will most likely go running  like  little bitches,  telling tales to headmaster..

I  mean no disrespect  personally  Ed, at least you have the guts and the decency to explain the thinking behind your argument. You've  done some excellent work,  however on this occasion I  disagree with you.  but  disagreeing with you in no way diminishes the  respect I have for you as a researcher. 

My problem is with these fucking mooks.  Who don't seem to understand basic  English.  Labouring under the apparent misapprehension that merely asserting  something is the same as proving something..

The more  outlandish the belief the more unpleasant the believer..that most definitely seems to be the case with  this pair of absolute fucking  roasters..

Their notion of  research is  more akin to urban mythology. Basing  your  " conclusions " on unwarranted  speculation,  hearsay or anecdotal reports..

Or out and out  bullshit. 

These two clowns bring the whole subject into disrepute.  And  apart from Jeremy,  Jonathan and occasionally a couple of others,  no one else seems to give a fuck. 

They seem content enough keeping their heads safely buried in the sand,  oohing and ahhing in  giddy rapture as they  carefully  strategise  how to deal with lone nutters if the SBT is  finally disproved...

Round and round they go...

Every step forward is immediately followed by at least two in reverse..I mean for  Armstrong's sake  some  folk are still discussing  Juddufki!! 

* William of ROKCam was a  famous  19th century  Australian  bushranger/ poet/ philosopher  , according to legend he was a distant descendant of  William of Ockham 

ROKCams  tinny being a Rokcification of  his illustrious  forebears  Razor..

JeremyBojczuk wrote:A sinner has repented! Praise be!

Sandy Larsen at the Ed Forum wrote:Hopefully he [Hargrove] and John Armstrong will factor this new finding into their larger H&L theory. (Though I don't have high hopes for that. Armstrong became abusive to me when I pointed out that the second floor encounter didn't occur, because Oswald -- as it turns out -- was out on the steps during the p. parade. That was Oswald's alibi that the FBI covered up.)

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/27746-evidence-that-the-bus-transfer-and-unfired-38-rounds-were-never-found-on-oswald/?do=findComment&comment=459529

That thread was posted about one month ago.....
But 5/6 months before that!!! http://www.prayer-man.com/lee-harvey-oswald-being-searched/

Voila!

First of all that is circular reasoning.
Saying the reason they werent found in previous SEARCH OF OSWALD was because they werent found till Boyd and Sims search him (for the third time.)
Therefore Gil knows they were still in his pockets???
Huh?

No.
Actually it proved Boyd and Sims guilty of planting evidence.
Dust that bus pass.
Run touch DNA on the bullets.
Lee didnt touch them.

Lee was searched and searched again no such items would be "left" on the suspect.... oh what they were gonna let him tear up pass, throw away or flush them or destroy these items still in his possession.
If anything the DPD needs to answer why that was done! Purposely!
It wasnt of course but hold DPD responsible for BOYD AND SIMS LIES AND ILLEGALITIES!
Cops look BAD BAD BAD.
They should they were involved in three murders that weekend and are caught here Red Handed.

How'd that conversation go:
BOYD: "Oh are these your bullets?"
LEE: "Uh, no!"
SIMS: "There, you can have those back."

For petes sake how does anyone believe in a million years the bullets and bus pass are "REAL" evidence.
Catch a clue... they are evidence of manufactured evidence. NO WAY AROUND IT GIL.
BUT,
Then to jack your clues from B!
DAMN!!!