Prayer Man

First topic message reminder :

Original Prayer Man thread at the Education Forum
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/20354-oswald-leaving-tsbd/

___________________________________________________________________________________________________


G'day,
I have to say I find it oh so mildly amusing reading some of the comments, thoughts and rants associated on other forums regarding Prayer Man / Oswald on the front steps. It's sad really, watching people who have spent a lifetime married to an idea or a theory, only to witness that idea or theory shattering into a thousand pieces and not accepting the inevitable singular conclusion which is staring them in the face. To Greg Parker, Sean Murphy and all the other amazing researchers following the path of truth in this case I tips me Lid.

Mick

These poeple who continue to use straw men and say "pixels/blob" are missing the point. They MUST ACCOUNT for who that individual is! I don't care WHAT one believes. So, I ask them, WHO do they think it is and give the arguments. A strong case has been made that, moreso than not, it is LHO.

Looks like Trit Trot might have been the originator of the Sarah Stanton theory.

Or it was Pat Speer at EF in 2013.

Quite likely.

Fetzer on Prayer Man. It starts around 1.03.

I gave up after 60 seconds.....

The trots command of english, be it "Texish" or British, is equal to his dating proficiency.
His girl broke up with him but she said they can still be cousins.

So be it!

Fetzer is a couple sandwiches short of a Subway franchise... thanks Vinny.

If you name two people near your position, then about to name a third, but are cut off and never name the third person but are asked to rename the second, then the third person was never denoted.
This is not rocket science etymology.

Im using BC's 'quote', thx!!

"The poeple who continue to use straw man arguments, or say its just "pixels, smudge or a blob" are not just missing the point. THEY must account for who that individual is! It matters little WHAT one believes. So WHO do they think it is, and give their arguments. A strong case has been made that, IT IS Lee Harvey Oswald by a study of the evidence.
Thus far their arguments have not been true or correct. Be they shotgunning for strangers or dart boarding females, each in turn has been rejected.
SO BE IT!
Cheers, Ed

Ed. Ledoux wrote:The trots command of english, be it "Texish" or British, is equal to his dating proficiency.
His girl broke up with him but she said they can still be cousins.

So be it!

Fetzer is a couple sandwiches short of a Subway franchise...  thanks Vinny.

If you name two people near your position, then about to name a third, but are cut off and never name the third person but are asked to rename the second, then the third person was never denoted.
This is not rocket science etymology.

Im using BC's 'quote', thx!!

"The poeple who continue to use straw man arguments, or say its just "pixels, smudge or a blob" are not just missing the point. THEY must account for who that individual is! It matters little WHAT one believes. So WHO do they think it is, and give their arguments. A strong case has been made that, IT IS Lee Harvey Oswald by a study of the evidence.
Thus far their arguments have not been true or correct. Be they shotgunning for strangers or dart boarding females, each in turn has been rejected.
SO BE IT!
Cheers, Ed

Ed it is extremely humbling for you of all people to be using a quote from me lol. I'm just tired of seeing folks attack the nature of a low quality image without recognizing the extreme relevance of the photo in context. I agree with you 100%, I've yet to see ANY convincing argument that it is either A) irrelevant, or B) not LHO. This is HUGE because of the fact that, as I've and so many of you have mentioned before me, whoever it is must be accounted for from even a basic historical perspective. In other words, we don't have know much about 11/22/1963 to know basic facts such as "well who was where in or around the building that worked there that morning?". Interestingly enough it is as if one must start with PM before moving on, else the entire case falls hard if LHO isn't where he is supposed to be officially.

It counts for zip, but I know in my heart of hearts it's Lee Oswald a top of the stairs in the shadow in the corner standing right next to the guy who befriended him some 5-6 weeks earlier. The guy whom gave him a lift to work most days. The guy who taught him on the job. The guy who was with him more than most - for the time he worked in at the TSBD. The guy who knows exactly who was standing next to him immediately after the shots rang out. That guy!

It's Lee Oswald. It is proven beyond a reasonable doubt. And Buell Wesley Frazier knows this.

I agree Mick. I hope he will open up soon.

The wanker Doyle thinks Lee had a coke and ran into Stanton on the rear 2nd floor stairway landing.
Why would Sarah be out there.
There are no food or candy machines out there.
Besides she would, like all other office employees, take the front steps or lift to exit the building.
She would not risk putting her 300 lbs down the creaky old back stairs.
Far too risky!!
Sarah met Lee, he is not going out, he is having the soda for his lunch.
Lunch he ate in the Domino room and after perhaps Shelley saw Lee on the first floor before having a bite of his own lunch(?)
Which all interactions logically happen near the front egress not the rear.
Utter wanker

Next he will prove Sarah's roaming girth was reason for reinforcement of all the floors with an extra sheet of plywood....

Things are not going well for Brian. Stinkys latest posts should leave Brian in no doubt that he is just a little bitch.......a pathetic whore if you will. Should he whinge too much he'll be banned.
Perhaps he can console himself on Gilbrides warm tit.

Duncan MacRae, I think you should be aware that Richard Gilbride uses Brian Doyle's login details at your forum or if he is more careful dictates his messages for Doyle to post. The first is easy to check thru the account's IPs used, logged in as BD.
If not he is dictating and emailing it to him.

How do I know this?

The sentencing and wording is a complete give away. Doyle never mentioned hoaxers ever before in any of his posts until a few days ago that post reads like a Gilbride post. But now on page 173 the investigation into the films up the chain was assumely done by RG ( mind you he did as much about it as everything else he claims to have done). Doyle cannot even post a picture let alone investigate the imagery deeper. 

You and I, do not see eye to eye on quite a few things and one could construe this as me trying to influence you in removing his membership.

I am glad to be proven wrong, but this is the 2nd or 3rd instance that Gilbride is writing rebuttals for Doyle. And they differ in no way when it comes to quality of content between the two of them. They amount to bugger all actually. Doyle did a fab thing tho, he killed the second floor lunch room encounter even more without realising it. Brian you will get the credit for this.

Classy.
Shit in his eye and offer a hanky.
Nicely done.
Cheers. Ed

steely dan wrote:Perhaps he can console himself on Gilbrides warm tit.

Ms Gilbride is a fine wet-nurse to the unwanted, the rejected, and those banned.

Well we knew this anyway, and he did make a mention of this before but Doyle is kinda thick and needs his face rubbed into it for him to comprehend that Duncan played Doyle, and Doyle  still comes up with a full denial. Always better than admitting you have been wrong for two years and counting.....


Duncan didn't see the buttons, Duncan INVENTED the buttons as a prank directed at members of another venue.
You latched on to my creation.


to which the pleb replied

A good detective/analyst would realize you couldn't draw arrows to buttons unless you could see them...You can just make out the two buttons that go up one side of the collar... 


You are not a good detective nor a good analyst, nor do you have any qualifications or expertise to even remotely entertain anyone else.


#shutdownprayerwoman

Der Forum may see a little more activity.

Screenshot in case it gets deleted.

barto wrote:

If you're really drunk.....and you squint...(I know because I've tried it)....Doyles version of PM still looks like a huge woman. Somebody needs to tell him.....

I'm not expert on PrayerMan but in defence of Wesley Frazier surely PM could not have been on the steps in front of him very long. 

In the Weigman film as I recollect PM is behind Shelley and Lovelady having apparently just arrived from lunch. A few seconds later S & L have run down the road and PrayerMan has moved onto the step and is leaning against the wall, getting filmed by Darnell. A few seconds later PM apparently moves towards the door to get out of the way of the women moving up the steps and is supposedly behind the door when the plod Baker asks him a question just a few seconds later.

If the above is correct PM would only have moved into Frazier's line of sight just when he is distracted by the shooting and commotion. Has anybody done some sort of timeline for PM's movements as per the above or whatever is the canonical version of them?