Lone Nutter Arrogance

A good example of lone nutter arrogance.


http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/07/entertainment/et-rutten7


I regard the belief that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone as an important indicium of mental health. In fact, I think there are three things that every serious American needs to believe about our recent history: Kennedy was killed by a lone lunatic, Americans really did land on the moon and the Twin Towers were destroyed when they were struck by two fully fueled airliners that had been hijacked by Islamic extremists organized by Al Qaeda. People who do not believe in these things are, within reasonable limits, entitled to sympathy. They are not entitled to a seat at the table where serious discussions occur.

It looks like he's reiterating his 'American journalist's pledge of fidelity to the official story' lest he ventures too far in assessing a conspiratorial tome. After all, he is a professional and he needs his job. I'm cool boss, don't imagine I'm promoting this book in any way, shape, or form. Hmmm. Maybe he was. I mean, could he really be that arrogant?  

Thanks Vinny.

A similar tone is set by Priscilla McMillan, "A Word About Lee Harvey Oswald", Washington Decoded, 11 June 2007:

The nuts are wanting not just. equality but to be Thee Standard for fitness. To be the only voice heard. Now if they are that tenuous that a mere dissenting word would upset the dinghy I'm not so sure their fitness is established.

Secrets and lies and those uninterested in these dont need psychoanalysis .... just us fools whom find fault with a shotty piece of craftsmanship.
Yeah.
Not my worry 'their' boat no float. And must silence anyone pointing out the leaks.
Cheers, Ed

Phil Dragoo wrote:A similar tone is set by Priscilla McMillan, "A Word About Lee Harvey Oswald", Washington Decoded, 11 June 2007:

After decades of speculation about a grassy knoll, the Zapruder film, and an acoustical tape, the man behind it all is too often overlooked. Lee Oswald was not a cardboard figure but a human being, and although he had barely turned twenty-four at the time he killed President Kennedy, he had a motive.

    Oswald was a believing Marxist, and his motive was to strike the deadliest blow he could imagine at capitalism in the United States. Oswald had been headed that way most of his sentient life. . . .

http://www.washingtondecoded.com/site/2007/06/index.html

Phil's note:  Charles Drago had stipulated anyone in possession of the known facts who did not conclude conspiracy was defective or complicit.  Morley mistook my quoting Drago as stating my own opinion and immediately launched on the necessity of inclusion--he included McAdam, and attacked Lisa Pease who insisted conspiracy was now a known rather than a hypothesis.

I find no member of government, media, academia dare question the Warren Report.  An Iron Curtain has descended on the rational faculties of those in positions to mold opinion into action.

The arrogance of that cabal despising the temporary resident of the Oval Office per Article II of the Constitution is on display both in the events of Horne's work on JFK's War with the National Security Establishment, as well as the counterpart intelligence Olympiad today.

Any of the above mentioned "leaders" would be hard-pressed to explain how the man not in the window who did not fire a rifle could have inflicted the fatal frontal wound from behind.

We may see Kamala Harris on a presidential ticket soon, and will remember she kept Sirhan inside, safe from deprogramming.  There are rules.

Yet the rule of the Ceaucescus relies on the absence of disbelief.  I disbelieve because it is absurd:  the orthodoxy has been serially pulverized by a series of serious researchers, just as the papers of Tony Szamboti demonstrate the collapse of the Towers cannot have been as we are instructed to believe.

Patricia could be relied upon "to write the articles we want"--as reliable as O'Brien in 1984.

So Phil.....you can't get lonelier or nuttier than Doyle or his BFF Gilbride.


https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?10903-The-quot-Albert-Doyle-quot-Operation-Evidence-and-Conclusions

Interesting that your post supporting Gilbride (at Der Forum) has been deleted.
 Is this because you are a shithouse?